MEXC is our top pick for anyone who also holds spot, at 0.05% taker against 0.30%, while on futures fees the two platforms are close.
Key Takeaways
BTCC here means the crypto exchange founded in 2011, not the British Touring Car Championship that dominates the same search term.
Spot is where the gap lives, at 0.00% maker and 0.05% taker on MEXC against a flat 0.20% and 0.30% on BTCC, worth about $15,000 a year on $500,000 traded monthly.
BTCC applies one spot rate to every user with no volume tiers, so trading more never narrows that gap.
Futures fees are nearly level at the entry tier, 0.040% against 0.048% taker, and at the top tier BTCC is the cheaper of the two.
BTCC holds a US Money Services Business registration and accepts US users, a market MEXC does not serve at all.
CoinGecko holds no derivatives profile, reserves figure or cybersecurity rating for BTCC, so several comparisons in this article could only be made on one side.
Search BTCC and you will mostly get touring cars.
This article is about BTCC the cryptocurrency exchange, launched in June 2011 and now registered in Vilnius, Lithuania.
It is one of the oldest venues still trading, it is built around perpetual futures rather than spot, and it holds a Money Services Business registration in the United States.
That last point matters more than anything else here, and we will come back to it.
We run MEXC, so this is our argument rather than a neutral referee's.
Our position is narrower than usual on this one.
If you trade spot at any volume, the cost difference is decisive: 0.05% taker against 0.30%, which is $15,000 a year on $500,000 traded monthly, and BTCC publishes no volume tiers that would narrow it.
On catalogue the same pattern holds, at 1,627 coins against 361.
If you trade only perpetuals, the fee case for switching is weak, and if you are a high-volume futures trader BTCC's top tier is cheaper than ours.
And if you are in the United States, this comparison has one answer and it is not us.
Fee figures for any exchange tend to drift between sources.
CoinGecko's profile field for BTCC currently shows 0.1% maker and 0.1% taker, while BTCC's own fee page, dated 7 August 2026, sets spot at 0.20% maker and 0.30% taker with no volume tiers.
We use the platform's own fee page in both directions, and we date it.
That applies to us too.
MEXC figures in this article come from the official MEXC fee page rather than from older Learn articles, because where those disagree the fee page is the one that governs.
If you take one habit away from this comparison, make it that one: check the fee page, note the date on it, and treat every secondary figure as a lead rather than a fact.
BTCC charges 0.20% to makers and 0.30% to takers on spot, and applies the same rate to every user regardless of volume.
MEXC charges 0.00% to makers and 0.05% to takers, falling to 0.04% with MX deduction.
Put $500,000 of monthly taker volume through each.
BTCC costs $1,500 a month, or $18,000 a year.
MEXC costs $250 a month, or $3,000 a year.
That is a $15,000 annual difference on identical activity, and because BTCC publishes no spot volume tiers, trading more does not close it.
BTCC's published perpetual fees start at 0.03% maker and 0.048% taker.
MEXC's standard perpetual fees are 0.010% maker and 0.040% taker, with a 0.020% taker rate on the BTCUSDT special tier.
At the entry tier MEXC is cheaper, by 0.008 of a percentage point on the taker side.
At the top of the ladder that reverses: BTCC publishes 0.01% maker and 0.015% taker at VIP7, which undercuts our BTCUSDT special rate.
Here is what that means on a real position.
Open $1,000 of margin at 20x, giving $20,000 of notional exposure, and close it, paying taker on both sides.
MEXC costs $16.00 at the standard rate and $8.00 on BTCUSDT.
BTCC costs $19.20 at its entry tier.
Three dollars on a round trip is not a reason to move an account.
Scaled to $500,000 of monthly notional the annual difference is about $480, against $15,000 on the spot side.
If perpetuals are the only thing you trade, we would rather you knew that than found it out after switching.
Both platforms sit at the high end of retail leverage, and both publish a headline number that only applies to specific contracts at specific position sizes.
BTCC's published trading guides describe leverage of up to 500x on selected perpetual contracts, and other pages on its site quote a lower figure, so check the contract specification for the market you intend to trade.
MEXC's BTCUSDT risk-limit table starts at 500x for positions up to roughly 316,730 USDT, then steps down to 200x, 100x, 50x, 20x and 10x as the position grows.
The tier table is the honest version of a leverage claim, because the headline figure disappears the moment your position gets large.
Leverage at these levels is not a feature we would push anyone towards.
Leverage at these levels is not a feature we would push anyone towards, and the tier table above is the version of the number we would rather you looked at.
Dimension | MEXC | BTCC |
Spot fees | 0.00% maker, 0.05% taker. 0.04% taker with MX deduction. | 0.20% maker, 0.30% taker. Flat for all users, no volume tiers. |
Coins and pairs | 1,627 coins, 2,019 tracked spot pairs. | 361 coins, 366 tracked spot pairs. |
Derivatives | 1,214 perpetual pairs tracked, open interest $12.0 billion. Fees 0.010% maker, 0.040% taker. Up to 500x on BTCUSDT at the first risk tier. | Perpetuals are the core product. Fees 0.03% maker, 0.048% taker, falling to 0.01% and 0.015% at VIP7. Up to 500x on selected contracts per its own guidance. |
Security and reserves | Monthly Merkle-tree PoR audited by Hacken. Guardian Fund. Trust Score 10 out of 10. | Publishes monthly Merkle-tree PoR reports without a named third-party auditor, most recently a 140% total reserve ratio in August 2026. Trust Score 3 out of 10. |
Deposits and withdrawals | Crypto and card rails. No service to US, UK, Canada or the EEA. | Fiat deposits in USD, AUD, CAD, EUR, JPY, KRW and TWD. Holds a US Money Services Business registration. |
Standout feature | Catalogue depth and tracked derivatives open interest at zero published maker cost on spot. | US market access, a 15-year operating record, and monthly Proof of Reserves reporting. |
Data verified as of 4 September 2026 against each platform's own fee page, help centre and published reports, and against CoinGecko exchange profiles pulled the same day.
The BTCC fee page carries a date of 7 August 2026.
Three things, and the first one is decisive for a large share of readers.
It can legally serve markets we cannot.
BTCC holds a US Money Services Business registration, and CoinGecko records that registration on its exchange profile.
MEXC does not serve the United States at all.
We could not confirm BTCC's current status in the United Kingdom or the European Economic Area from a primary source, so we are not making a claim either way.
If you live in one of them, BTCC is a real option and MEXC is not, and no amount of fee arithmetic changes that.
Cheaper futures at the top of the ladder.
A VIP7 taker rate of 0.015% is below our BTCUSDT special rate of 0.020%.
For a high-volume perpetuals trader who reaches that tier, BTCC is the cheaper venue on the product it is built around.
Fifteen years of continuous operation with no breach we could find on the public record.
This section exists because half of this comparison could only be checked on one side.
CoinGecko tracks MEXC's derivatives book at 1,214 perpetual pairs with $12.0 billion of open interest, tracks $618.0 million of exchange reserves, and carries a CORE3 cybersecurity rating of three stars out of five.
For BTCC it holds none of those four figures.
That is not the same as saying the numbers are bad.
It means an independent party has not published them, and BTCC's own materials give different perpetual contract counts in different places, so we have not quoted one.
We would treat that score with care, because it scores spot activity on a platform whose main business is derivatives, and it will understate a futures-first venue by design.
The spot catalogue is the one breadth figure both sides can be measured on, and there MEXC lists roughly four and a half times as many coins.
MEXC does not serve the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada or the European Economic Area.
BTCC holds a US Money Services Business registration and accepts US users.
For US readers the answer is BTCC or another locally registered venue, and we would rather say so plainly than write a comparison that quietly ignores where most English-language readers live.
Neither platform holds Korean virtual asset service provider registration, and both appear on the list of undeclared operators published by Upbit dated 31 August 2026.
One more disclosure while we are here.
CoinGecko's regulation field records a US Money Services Business registration for BTCC and an International Crypto License in the Comoros for MEXC.
Neither is authorisation in the European sense, and a Comoros licence in particular is a light-touch registration rather than a supervised regime.
You trade spot as well as futures, outside the restricted regions.
MEXC is the answer in this comparison, on the $15,000 annual spot gap and on a catalogue roughly four and a half times larger.
You trade perpetuals only, at moderate volume.
The two are close enough that fees should not decide it, and depth of book matters more than the 0.008 point difference.
You trade perpetuals at high volume and can reach a top VIP tier.
BTCC's published VIP7 rate is cheaper than our best published futures rate, and we are not going to pretend it is not.
You are in the United States.
BTCC, or another locally registered venue, and MEXC is not available to you.
Is BTCC the same as the British Touring Car Championship?
No, they are unrelated and only share an abbreviation.
BTCC in this article is a cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2011 and registered in Lithuania.
Which is cheaper for futures, MEXC or BTCC?
MEXC at the entry tier, 0.040% against 0.048% taker.
At the top tier BTCC is cheaper, publishing 0.015% taker against MEXC's 0.020% BTCUSDT rate.
Which is cheaper for spot trading?
MEXC, by a wide margin, at 0.00% maker and 0.05% taker against BTCC's flat 0.20% and 0.30%.
On $500,000 traded monthly that is about $15,000 a year.
Is BTCC available in the US and Canada?
BTCC holds a US Money Services Business registration and accepts US users.
MEXC serves neither market.
What is the maximum leverage on each platform?
Both publish up to 500x on selected perpetual contracts.
MEXC's BTCUSDT risk-limit table caps 500x at roughly 316,730 USDT of position size before stepping down.
Does BTCC have Proof of Reserves?
Yes, BTCC has published monthly Merkle-tree Proof of Reserves reports since April 2025, with a 140% total ratio in August 2026.
CoinGecko does not currently track a reserves figure for the platform.
How many contracts does each platform list?
CoinGecko tracks 1,214 perpetual pairs on MEXC and does not maintain a derivatives profile for BTCC.
On spot the tracked counts are 1,627 coins against 361.
Perpetual futures are high-risk instruments and can result in the loss of your entire margin in minutes.
Fees on futures are charged on full notional value rather than on the margin you post, so leverage multiplies your cost as well as your exposure.
Funding is charged separately every eight hours and can exceed trading fees on a position held for several days.
High leverage narrows the price move required to trigger liquidation, and at 500x a move of a fraction of one percent against you is enough.
Proof-of-reserves attestations are point-in-time snapshots and do not guarantee that any platform will remain solvent.
MEXC is not licensed in the European Economic Area and does not provide services to residents of the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada or the EEA.
Nothing here is investment advice, and you should assess your own circumstances and risk tolerance before opening any account or position.
Every figure here has a named source and a date, and both platforms' aggregator data was pulled on the same day so the numbers stay comparable.
Readers weighing a move away from BTCC specifically may want our BTCC alternatives comparison, which covers seven platforms on fees, contracts and reserves.