The post Abu Dhabi Struggling To Land Santos, Its Aussie Takeover Target appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Resources nationalism is emerging as an obstacle to an attempt by the oil-rich middle east emirate of Abu Dhabi to acquire Santos, Australia’s second biggest oil and gas company. Working with a consortium which includes Carlyle, a specialist U.S. buy-out group, the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (Adnoc) first proposed a takeover in mid-June priced at an indicative $5.76, a 28% price premium at the time of the bid. The Moomba petroleum and natural gas plant in the Cooper Basin, South Australia Picture by Brendan Esposito (Fairfax Media via Getty Images) Fairfax Media via Getty Images Santos operates the Cooper Basin gas project based at Moomba in central Australia as well as being a shareholder in a number of liquefied natural gas (LNG) export projects. The $24 billion offer had been months in the planning and was described as a “non-binding indicative proposal” which the Santos directors said they would recommend to shareholders subject to due diligence analysis scheduled for completion on August 8. Adnoc and Carlyle, working as the XRG Consortium, were granted exclusive rights by Santos to work on its proposed bid but when the deadline arrived the deal had to be extended for two weeks to last Friday (August 22) a date which also passed without finalization of the deal. Growing Opposition Initial opposition to the possible sale of a major Australian oil and gas business to a foreign country was muted but has grown louder as concern grows over foreign control of declining domestic gas supply and rising (LNG) exports. The chances of the bid succeeding took a turn for the worse last week as the second deadline approached with Santos announcing that XRG would be given another four weeks to finalize its offer. Santos said it was working collaboratively with XRG but also surprised investors… The post Abu Dhabi Struggling To Land Santos, Its Aussie Takeover Target appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Resources nationalism is emerging as an obstacle to an attempt by the oil-rich middle east emirate of Abu Dhabi to acquire Santos, Australia’s second biggest oil and gas company. Working with a consortium which includes Carlyle, a specialist U.S. buy-out group, the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (Adnoc) first proposed a takeover in mid-June priced at an indicative $5.76, a 28% price premium at the time of the bid. The Moomba petroleum and natural gas plant in the Cooper Basin, South Australia Picture by Brendan Esposito (Fairfax Media via Getty Images) Fairfax Media via Getty Images Santos operates the Cooper Basin gas project based at Moomba in central Australia as well as being a shareholder in a number of liquefied natural gas (LNG) export projects. The $24 billion offer had been months in the planning and was described as a “non-binding indicative proposal” which the Santos directors said they would recommend to shareholders subject to due diligence analysis scheduled for completion on August 8. Adnoc and Carlyle, working as the XRG Consortium, were granted exclusive rights by Santos to work on its proposed bid but when the deadline arrived the deal had to be extended for two weeks to last Friday (August 22) a date which also passed without finalization of the deal. Growing Opposition Initial opposition to the possible sale of a major Australian oil and gas business to a foreign country was muted but has grown louder as concern grows over foreign control of declining domestic gas supply and rising (LNG) exports. The chances of the bid succeeding took a turn for the worse last week as the second deadline approached with Santos announcing that XRG would be given another four weeks to finalize its offer. Santos said it was working collaboratively with XRG but also surprised investors…

Abu Dhabi Struggling To Land Santos, Its Aussie Takeover Target

2025/08/25 11:17

Resources nationalism is emerging as an obstacle to an attempt by the oil-rich middle east emirate of Abu Dhabi to acquire Santos, Australia’s second biggest oil and gas company.

Working with a consortium which includes Carlyle, a specialist U.S. buy-out group, the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (Adnoc) first proposed a takeover in mid-June priced at an indicative $5.76, a 28% price premium at the time of the bid.

The Moomba petroleum and natural gas plant in the Cooper Basin, South Australia Picture by Brendan Esposito (Fairfax Media via Getty Images)

Fairfax Media via Getty Images

Santos operates the Cooper Basin gas project based at Moomba in central Australia as well as being a shareholder in a number of liquefied natural gas (LNG) export projects.

The $24 billion offer had been months in the planning and was described as a “non-binding indicative proposal” which the Santos directors said they would recommend to shareholders subject to due diligence analysis scheduled for completion on August 8.

Adnoc and Carlyle, working as the XRG Consortium, were granted exclusive rights by Santos to work on its proposed bid but when the deadline arrived the deal had to be extended for two weeks to last Friday (August 22) a date which also passed without finalization of the deal.

Growing Opposition

Initial opposition to the possible sale of a major Australian oil and gas business to a foreign country was muted but has grown louder as concern grows over foreign control of declining domestic gas supply and rising (LNG) exports.

The chances of the bid succeeding took a turn for the worse last week as the second deadline approached with Santos announcing that XRG would be given another four weeks to finalize its offer.

Santos said it was working collaboratively with XRG but also surprised investors by revealing that even if acceptable terms were reached for a binding Scheme Implementation Agreement (SIA) it could take a minimum of another four weeks after that point was reached for XRG to obtain approvals from members of its bidding consortium.

Helicopter point of view of Abu Dhabi skyline with surrounding area.

getty

The latest extension to the timetable was accepted by investors who continue buying Santos shares which have risen by 5 cents over the past week to $5.03.

But the prolonged bidding process has started to flush out critics who question whether Santos, under foreign control, would make investments to expand domestic gas supply, or invest where investment returns were more attractive.

An ominous development for the deal is the emergence of the powerful labor movement, led by the Australian Workers Union (AWU) which represents some employees on Santos sites.

The national secretary of the AWU, Paul Farrow, was reported by Australian media earlier today as being critical of the high level of Australian LNG exports being made by foreign companies.

He told The Australian newspaper that companies had been able to sell gas to the highest foreign bidder without restriction.

Fairer Deal

“These multinationals should be kissing the boots of every Australian taxpayer for the run they’ve had over the last 10 years, but it’s time for a fairer deal,” Farrow said.

The AWU is understood to be close to the man who will make the final decision on XRG’s attempt to acquire Santos, the Australian Treasurer (Finance Minister) Jim Chalmers who will be advised by the Foreign Investment Review Board.

Time, which can be the worst enemy of any corporate deal, is not favoring the XRG move on Santos, which earlier today reported a 22% decline in profit for the six months to June 30.

The underlying profit fall from $654 million to $508 million did not prevent management from declaring a small increase in the half-year dividend, which was lifted from 13c to 13.4c.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/timtreadgold/2025/08/24/abu-dhabi-struggling-to-land-santos-its-aussie-takeover-target/

Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Akash Network’s Strategic Move: A Crucial Burn for AKT’s Future

Akash Network’s Strategic Move: A Crucial Burn for AKT’s Future

BitcoinWorld Akash Network’s Strategic Move: A Crucial Burn for AKT’s Future In the dynamic world of decentralized computing, exciting developments are constantly shaping the future. Today, all eyes are on Akash Network, the innovative supercloud project, as it proposes a significant change to its tokenomics. This move aims to strengthen the value of its native token, AKT, and further solidify its position in the competitive blockchain space. The community is buzzing about a newly submitted governance proposal that could introduce a game-changing Burn Mint Equilibrium (BME) model. What is the Burn Mint Equilibrium (BME) for Akash Network? The core of this proposal revolves around a concept called Burn Mint Equilibrium, or BME. Essentially, this model is designed to create a balance in the token’s circulating supply by systematically removing a portion of tokens from existence. For Akash Network, this means burning an amount of AKT that is equivalent to the U.S. dollar value of fees paid by network users. Fee Conversion: When users pay for cloud services on the Akash Network, these fees are typically collected in various cryptocurrencies or stablecoins. AKT Equivalence: The proposal suggests converting the U.S. dollar value of these collected fees into an equivalent amount of AKT. Token Burn: This calculated amount of AKT would then be permanently removed from circulation, or ‘burned’. This mechanism creates a direct link between network utility and token supply reduction. As more users utilize the decentralized supercloud, more AKT will be burned, potentially impacting the token’s scarcity and value. Why is This Proposal Crucial for AKT Holders? For anyone holding AKT, or considering investing in the Akash Network ecosystem, this proposal carries significant weight. Token burning mechanisms are often viewed as a positive development because they can lead to increased scarcity. When supply decreases while demand remains constant or grows, the price per unit tends to increase. Here are some key benefits: Increased Scarcity: Burning tokens reduces the total circulating supply of AKT. This makes each remaining token potentially more valuable over time. Demand-Supply Dynamics: The BME model directly ties the burning of AKT to network usage. Higher adoption of the Akash Network supercloud translates into more fees, and thus more AKT burned. Long-Term Value Proposition: By creating a deflationary pressure, the proposal aims to enhance AKT’s long-term value, making it a more attractive asset for investors and long-term holders. This strategic move demonstrates a commitment from the Akash Network community to optimize its tokenomics for sustainable growth and value appreciation. How Does BME Impact the Decentralized Supercloud Mission? Beyond token value, the BME proposal aligns perfectly with the broader mission of the Akash Network. As a decentralized supercloud, Akash provides a marketplace for cloud computing resources, allowing users to deploy applications faster, more efficiently, and at a lower cost than traditional providers. The BME model reinforces this utility. Consider these impacts: Network Health: A stronger AKT token can incentivize more validators and providers to secure and contribute resources to the network, improving its overall health and resilience. Ecosystem Growth: Enhanced token value can attract more developers and projects to build on the Akash Network, fostering a vibrant and diverse ecosystem. User Incentive: While users pay fees, the potential appreciation of AKT could indirectly benefit those who hold the token, creating a circular economy within the supercloud. This proposal is not just about burning tokens; it’s about building a more robust, self-sustaining, and economically sound decentralized cloud infrastructure for the future. What Are the Next Steps for the Akash Network Community? As a governance proposal, the BME model will now undergo a period of community discussion and voting. This is a crucial phase where AKT holders and network participants can voice their opinions, debate the merits, and ultimately decide on the future direction of the project. Transparency and community engagement are hallmarks of decentralized projects like Akash Network. Challenges and Considerations: Implementation Complexity: Ensuring the burning mechanism is technically sound and transparent will be vital. Community Consensus: Achieving broad agreement within the diverse Akash Network community is key for successful adoption. The outcome of this vote will significantly shape the tokenomics and economic model of the Akash Network, influencing its trajectory in the rapidly evolving decentralized cloud landscape. The proposal to introduce a Burn Mint Equilibrium model represents a bold and strategic step for Akash Network. By directly linking network usage to token scarcity, the project aims to create a more resilient and valuable AKT token, ultimately strengthening its position as a leading decentralized supercloud provider. This move underscores the project’s commitment to innovative tokenomics and sustainable growth, promising an exciting future for both users and investors in the Akash Network ecosystem. It’s a clear signal that Akash is actively working to enhance its value proposition and maintain its competitive edge in the decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 1. What is the main goal of the Burn Mint Equilibrium (BME) proposal for Akash Network? The primary goal is to adjust the circulating supply of AKT tokens by burning a portion of network fees, thereby creating deflationary pressure and potentially enhancing the token’s long-term value and scarcity. 2. How will the amount of AKT to be burned be determined? The proposal suggests burning an amount of AKT equivalent to the U.S. dollar value of fees paid by users on the Akash Network for cloud services. 3. What are the potential benefits for AKT token holders? Token holders could benefit from increased scarcity of AKT, which may lead to higher demand and appreciation in value over time, especially as network usage grows. 4. How does this proposal relate to the overall mission of Akash Network? The BME model reinforces the Akash Network‘s mission by creating a stronger, more economically robust ecosystem. A healthier token incentivizes network participants, fostering growth and stability for the decentralized supercloud. 5. What is the next step for this governance proposal? The proposal will undergo a period of community discussion and voting by AKT token holders. The community’s decision will determine if the BME model is implemented on the Akash Network. If you found this article insightful, consider sharing it with your network! Your support helps us bring more valuable insights into the world of decentralized technology. Stay informed and help spread the word about the exciting developments happening within Akash Network. To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping decentralized cloud solutions price action. This post Akash Network’s Strategic Move: A Crucial Burn for AKT’s Future first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Paylaş
Coinstats2025/09/22 21:35