TLDR Buterin warns centralized stablecoins weaken DeFi’s mission and increase structural risk. Experts say many yield models mimic decentralization but rely on TLDR Buterin warns centralized stablecoins weaken DeFi’s mission and increase structural risk. Experts say many yield models mimic decentralization but rely on

Vitalik Buterin Calls Out ‘Fake DeFi’ as Regulators Target Stablecoins

2026/02/10 01:32
Okuma süresi: 3 dk

TLDR

  • Buterin warns centralized stablecoins weaken DeFi’s mission and increase structural risk.
  • Experts say many yield models mimic decentralization but rely on centralized collateral.
  • Buterin proposes a two-tier risk system pushing for transparent, diversified structures.
  • New global rules demand full reserves, limiting algorithmic and decentralized stablecoins.
  • Regulatory pressure may stall DeFi innovation and boost dependence on centralized issuers.

The debate over decentralized finance gained new tension as Buterin renewed his critique of centralized practices, and the discussion widened as regulatory pressures intensified. The renewed focus highlighted concerns about stability, control, and decentralization across major markets. The issue also raised questions about long-term structures that continue to shape the sector.

Experts Challenge Current DeFi Models

Buterin questioned the rise of centralized stablecoin strategies and argued that many structures weaken decentralization. He stressed that several popular practices support speculative positioning and reduce the purpose of core DeFi systems. He also noted that markets still rely heavily on centralized dollars, which limits the benefits of open networks.

Buterin’s comments revived claims that some yield strategies only imitate decentralized models and therefore offer limited structural improvement. The concerns echoed growing warnings that many protocols depend on centralized collateral and cannot shift risk effectively. The discussion also showed that DeFi still carries a split identity between efficiency and ideology.

Analysts argued that non-Ethereum networks face hurdles because early Ethereum users prioritized self-custody, while newer chains rely on institutional custodians. They added that this divide restricts broader decentralization growth and reinforces trust in centralized issuers. Buterin aligned with that view and called for structures that support independent risk distribution.

Buterin Sets Two-Tier Framework for DeFi Risk

Buterin outlined a model that separates risk evaluation into two categories and emphasized the need for transparent counterparty structures. He described a basic tier where overcollateralized stablecoins can shift the risk to market makers. He added a second tier for systems that include real-world assets but maintain diversification and overcollateralization.

Buterin argued that popular lending models using centralized stablecoins fail to meet either tier. He said such approaches increase exposure to single issuers and therefore reduce the role of decentralization. The remarks showed his continuing push for stablecoin designs that reduce dependency on centralized reserve assets.

Buterin also maintained that algorithmic models can add value when they spread collateral sources across independent pools. He stated that the approach improves user protection because risk no longer rests on one issuer. His position placed pressure on protocols that rely on narrow reserve frameworks.

Regulators Reinforce Global Restrictions on Stablecoin Design

Regulators in several regions advanced rules that require full reserves and strict issuer oversight. Brazil proposed restrictions on algorithmic models, and officials emphasized their preference for redeemable structures. Bahrain and the EU continued to support similar rules that center on issuer guarantees.

Authorities said stablecoins must maintain predictable redemption to prevent liquidity stress. They also warned that unregulated models could trigger sudden de-pegging events. These rules could limit decentralized structures and increase reliance on centralized dollars.

Analysts stated that global frameworks may restrict experimentation and push some decentralized stablecoins outside regulated markets. They also warned that stricter policies could undermine Buterin’s push for decentralized risk systems. The shift may leave DeFi facing renewed dependence on centralized reserves, which remains the core issue Buterin raised.

The post Vitalik Buterin Calls Out ‘Fake DeFi’ as Regulators Target Stablecoins appeared first on CoinCentral.

Piyasa Fırsatı
DeFi Logosu
DeFi Fiyatı(DEFI)
$0.000302
$0.000302$0.000302
-4.43%
USD
DeFi (DEFI) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Jump’s Firedancer Team Proposes Removing Solana Block Limit After Alpenglow Upgrade

Jump’s Firedancer Team Proposes Removing Solana Block Limit After Alpenglow Upgrade

PANews reported on September 29th that according to The Block, Jump Crypto's Firedancer team is building a high-performance client for Solana. Their SIMD-0370 proposal proposes removing the current fixed limit of 60 million CUs per block (a previous proposal had raised this limit to 100 million) after Solana's major Alpenglow upgrade, scheduled for testing later this year. Without a fixed limit, block size would adjust based on the transaction volume accommodated by high-performance validators, while weaker validators would automatically abstain from voting on oversized blocks by skipping the voting mechanism. The proposal argues that removing the limit would encourage well-funded block producers to upgrade their hardware and add more transactions to increase revenue, incentivizing others to follow suit, creating a "flywheel effect" and increasing the average capacity of validator clients. Roger Wattenhofer, head of research at Anza and a driving force behind Solana's Alpenglow upgrade, supports removing the limit but also expresses concerns about potential centralization and network stability risks. He stated that these issues are solvable and that he has been a staunch supporter of removing the limit.
Paylaş
PANews2025/09/29 07:16
Sushi Solana integration expands multichain DeFi reach

Sushi Solana integration expands multichain DeFi reach

The post Sushi Solana integration expands multichain DeFi reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a move that underscores growing DeFi competition, Sushi
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/10 05:22
Sushi Solana integration signals strategic DeFi expansion on a fast-growing blockchain

Sushi Solana integration signals strategic DeFi expansion on a fast-growing blockchain

In a move that underscores growing DeFi competition, Sushi Solana integration is set to widen access to high-speed trading for millions of crypto users. Sushi deploys
Paylaş
The Cryptonomist2026/02/10 04:54