CoinGlass has called into question the authenticity of decentralized perps platforms, with Aster, Lighter and Hyperliquid data showing discrepancies. Some, likeCoinGlass has called into question the authenticity of decentralized perps platforms, with Aster, Lighter and Hyperliquid data showing discrepancies. Some, like

Hyperliquid Draws Scrutiny as Coinglass Exposes Inconsistencies in Perp DEX Volumes

2026/02/09 20:41
Okuma süresi: 3 dk
  • CoinGlass has called into question the authenticity of decentralized perps platforms, with Aster, Lighter and Hyperliquid data showing discrepancies.
  • Some, like Multicoin Capital founder Kyle Samani, used the data to attack Hyperliquid, calling it a facilitator of crime and terror.

Decentralized derivatives exchanges are once again on the spotlight, with data from CoinGlass calling into questions some of the figures reported by Hyperliquid, Aster and Lighter.

CoinGlass compared the three platforms on data recorded on Sunday, Feb 9. Hyperliquid reportedly posted $3.76 billion in trading volume, with a $4.05 billion open interest and $122.96 million in liquidations. Aster’s volume stood at $2.76 billion, but its open interest and liquidations hit $927 million and $7.2 million, respectively.

Lighter came in at third with $1.81 billion in volume, and open interest and liquidations at $731 million and $3.34 million, respectively.

As CoinGlass points out, in a perps trading environment with authentic activity that’s not manipulated, there should be “meaningful open interest dynamics and larger liquidation numbers.” During market moves, there must also be stronger long and short stress.

However, the data from the three shows that while trading volume is relatively close, Aster and Lighter’s liquidations are much lower than Hyperliquid’s at 1:17 and 1:37.

CoinGlass believes that this notable discrepancy stems from these two platforms’ outsized incentive-driven looping. This means that they have been offering incentives to some traders on their platforms, such as through points and airdrop farming.

It could also stem from market makers engaging in self trading and wash trading or the platforms could be inflating the volume by using a different methodology to report on their metrics. CoinGlass concluded:

The Hyperliquid and Aster Manipulation Debates

The CoinGlass data stirred mixed responses. Those who have been critical of the DEXes jumped on to use the data to double down on their criticism, while their communities were quick to defend the metrics and question’s CoinGlass’ motives.

One of the notable critics is Kyle Samani, the founder and former managing partner of Multicoin Capital, an investment fund that was an early backer of projects like Algorand, Dfinity, Kalshi, Lido, Solana and Worldcoin. He stepped down from Multicoin last week.

Samani took to X to describe Hyperliquid as “everything wrong with crypto.” He claims that the platform openly facilitates crime and terror and that a combination of a permissioned and closed-source platform, with a founder who fled the country, presents a level of risk traders should avoid. (It’s worth noting that Hyperliquid founder Jeff Yan grew up in California and is still a resident of the US).

KYLEImage courtesy of Kyle Samani on X.

Samani was immediately called out by many, with some describing his post as “Elizabeth Warren-style fearmongering.” Arthur Hayes, the founder and former CEO of BitMEX exchange even bet Samani that HYPE would outperform any token with over $1 billion in market cap; the wager was for $100,000, although Samani hasn’t accepted it at press time.

Aster also had its defenders. One user on X, who identifies as the DEX’s Spanish Discord moderator, dismissed the CoinGlass research as just speculation.

“Wow, I thought Coinglass was a reputable company…Taking these metrics from a single day, a Sunday, just to speculate on a possible explanation is truly malicious,” he posted.

It’s not the first time Hyperliquid has been caught up in such speculation. As we reported, IOTA founder Dominik Schiener had to come to the project’s defense in December after multiple claims of a lack of transparency.

]]>
Piyasa Fırsatı
Perpetual Protocol Logosu
Perpetual Protocol Fiyatı(PERP)
$0.02469
$0.02469$0.02469
0.00%
USD
Perpetual Protocol (PERP) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

ETH Exit Queue Gridlocks As Validators Pile Up

ETH Exit Queue Gridlocks As Validators Pile Up

The post ETH Exit Queue Gridlocks As Validators Pile Up appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Welcome to The Protocol, CoinDesk’s weekly wrap of the most important stories in cryptocurrency tech development. I’m Margaux Nijkerk, a reporter at CoinDesk. In this issue: Ethereum Faces Validator Bottleneck With 2.5M ETH Awaiting Exit Is Ethereum’s DeFi Future on L2s? Liquidity, Innovation Say Perhaps Yes Ethereum Foundation Starts New AI Team to Support Agentic Payments American Express Introduces Blockchain-Based ‘Travel Stamps’ Network News ETHEREUM VALIDATOR EXIT QUEUE FACES BOTTLENECK: Ethereum’s proof-of-stake system is facing its largest test yet. As of mid-September, roughly 2.5 million ETH — valued at roughly $11.25 billion — is waiting to leave the validator set, according to validator queue dashboards. The backlog pushed exit wait times to more than 46 days on Sept. 14, the longest in Ethereum’s short staking history, dashboards show. The last peak, in August, put the exit queue at 18 days. The initial spark came on Sept. 9, when Kiln, a large infrastructure provider, chose to exit all of its validators as a safety precaution. The move, triggered by recent security incidents including the NPM supply-chain attack and the SwissBorg breach, pushed around 1.6 million ETH into the queue at once. Though unrelated to Ethereum’s staking protocol itself, the hacks rattled confidence enough for Kiln to hit pause, highlighting how events in the broader crypto ecosystem can cascade into Ethereum’s validator dynamics. In a blog post from staking provider Figment, Senior Analyst Benjamin Thalman noted that the current exit queue build up isn’t only about security. After ETH has rallied more than 160% since April, some stakers are simply taking profits. Others, especially institutional players, are shifting their portfolios’ exposure. At the same time, the number of validators entering the Ethereum staking ecosystem has been steadily rising. Ethereum’s churn limit, which is a protocol safeguard that caps how many validators can…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 15:15
TheWell Bioscience Launches VitroPrime™ 3D Culture and Imaging Plate for Organoid and 3D Cell Culture Workflows

TheWell Bioscience Launches VitroPrime™ 3D Culture and Imaging Plate for Organoid and 3D Cell Culture Workflows

A new in-plate, zero-disruption design enables reproducible organoid culture, downstream processing, and high-resolution imaging in a single 3D cell culture plate
Paylaş
AI Journal2026/02/09 22:02
Tom Lee Linked BitMine Scoops Up $82 Million in Ethereum as Institutional Appetite Heats Up

Tom Lee Linked BitMine Scoops Up $82 Million in Ethereum as Institutional Appetite Heats Up

Tom Lee–Backed BitMine Makes $82 Million Ethereum Purchase, Signaling Growing Institutional Confidence BitMine, a crypto-focused firm associated with veteran ma
Paylaş
Hokanews2026/02/09 22:08