The symfony/workflow component has long been one of the framework’s most powerful, yet underutilized, gems. It allows developers to decouple business process logicThe symfony/workflow component has long been one of the framework’s most powerful, yet underutilized, gems. It allows developers to decouple business process logic

Here's How You Can Build a FinTech Approval System With Symfony 7.4

The symfony/workflow component has long been one of the framework’s most powerful, yet underutilized, gems. It allows developers to decouple business process logic from entity state, transforming complex “spaghetti code” status checks into clean, visualizable directed graphs.

\ For years, however, the component had a strict limitation rooted in its implementation of Petri nets: Tokens were boolean. An object was either in a place (state), or it wasn’t. While you could be in multiple places simultaneously (parallel processing), you couldn’t be in the same place multiple times.

\ Symfony 7.4 changes the game with Weighted Transitions.

This new feature introduces multiplicity. You can now model scenarios where quantities matter: “collect 4 signatures,” “process 5 batch items,” or “wait for 3 subsystems to initialize.”

\ In this article, we will build a robust Multi-Signature Approval System for a FinTech application. We will explore how to configure weighted transitions, implement the entity logic, and verify the flow with rigorous testing — all using Symfony 7.4 and PHP 8.3.

The Concept (Petri Nets vs. State Machines)

Before writing code, it is crucial to understand why this feature exists.

The State Machine Limitation

A State Machine is linear. An elevator is either STOPPEDMOVINGUP, or MOVINGDOWN. It cannot be MOVINGUP twice. This is perfect for simpler statuses (e.g., Order::STATUSPAID).

The Workflow (Petri Net)

Workflow allows an object to sit in multiple places at once. In a “New Employee Onboarding” process, an employee might simultaneously be in:

  • provisioning_laptop
  • creatingemailaccount

\ Both must be completed before they move to onboarded.

The Missing Piece: Multiplicity

Prior to Symfony 7.4, if you needed “3 Managers to approve an expense,” you couldn’t model this purely in the Workflow. You had to:

  1. Create a waitingforapproval place.
  2. Add a counter field to your entity ($approvalCount).
  3. Use a Guard Event listener to check if ($subject->getApprovalCount() >= 3) before allowing the transition.

\ With Weighted Transitions, the “counter” is now part of the workflow state itself. The workflow engine natively understands that the subject is in the approved state 3 times.

Project Setup

Let’s create a new Symfony project and install the necessary components.

composer create-project symfony/skeleton:"7.4.*" fintech-approval cd fintech-approval composer require symfony/workflow symfony/framework-bundle symfony/orm-pack symfony/maker-bundle

\ We will also need a database. For this example, we’ll use SQLite for simplicity, but the logic applies to MySQL/PostgreSQL exactly the same.

# .env DATABASE_URL="sqlite:///%kernel.project_dir%/var/data.db"

Configuration (The Core Logic)

This is where the magic happens. We will define a workflow called expense_approval.

\ The Scenario:

  1. An expense report is created (draft).
  2. It is submitted (review_required).
  3. The Weighted Step: The system distributes the request to 3 required approvers.
  4. Each approver grants approval individually.
  5. Once 3 approvals are collected, the expense moves to readyforpayment.

\ Create or update config/packages/workflow.yaml:

# config/packages/workflow.yaml framework: workflows: expense_approval: type: workflow # MUST be 'workflow', not 'state_machine' audit_trail: enabled: true marking_store: type: method property: currentState # This must hold an array supports: - App\Entity\ExpenseReport initial_marking: draft places: - draft - review_pool - approved_pool - ready_for_payment - rejected transitions: submit: from: draft to: - place: review_pool weight: 3 # <--- OUTPUT WEIGHT approve: from: review_pool to: approved_pool # Default weight is 1. One 'review_pool' token becomes one 'approved_pool' token. reject: from: review_pool to: rejected # If rejected, we might want to clear all tokens, # but for simplicity, one rejection moves to rejected. finalize: from: - place: approved_pool weight: 3 # <--- INPUT WEIGHT to: ready_for_payment

Deconstructing the Config

  1. type: workflow: Weighted transitions rely on token buckets. This is not possible in a state machine.
  2. submitTransition: \n - to: { place: reviewpool, weight: 3 } - When this fires, the reviewpoolplace receives 3 tokens. \n - Think of this as creating 3 “tickets” that need to be punched.
  3. approveTransition: \n -from: reviewpool, to: approvedpool. \n - Standard 1-to-1 weight. \n - Because we have 3 tokens in review_pool, we can fire this transition 3 times.
  4. finalizeTransition: \n - from: { place: approvedpool, weight: 3 }- This transition is blocked until the approvedpoolcontains exactly (or at least) 3 tokens. \n - Once the 3rd approval comes in, this path unlocks.

The Entity

We need an entity that supports this “Multi-State” marking store. The currentState property must be an array to hold the token counts (e.g., [‘reviewpool’ => 2, ‘approvedpool’ => 1]).

namespace App\Entity; use App\Repository\ExpenseReportRepository; use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM; #[ORM\Entity(repositoryClass: ExpenseReportRepository::class)] class ExpenseReport { #[ORM\Id] #[ORM\GeneratedValue] #[ORM\Column] private ?int $id = null; #[ORM\Column(length: 255)] private string $description; #[ORM\Column] private float $amount; /** * Stores the workflow state. * For Weighted Workflows, this stores the places and their quantities. * Example DB content: {"review_pool": 2, "approved_pool": 1} */ #[ORM\Column(type: 'json')] private array $currentState = []; public function __construct(string $description, float $amount) { $this->description = $description; $this->amount = $amount; // Initial marking is handled by the workflow component, // but initializing to empty array is good practice. } public function getId(): ?int { return $this->id; } public function getDescription(): string { return $this->description; } public function getAmount(): float { return $this->amount; } public function getCurrentState(): array { return $this->currentState; } public function setCurrentState(array $currentState): self { $this->currentState = $currentState; return $this; } }

\ Run the migration:

php bin/console make:migration php bin/console doctrine:migrations:migrate

The Service Layer

To interact with this workflow cleanly, we should create a service. This service will handle the logic of “who” is approving, though for this tutorial, we will focus on the workflow mechanics.

namespace App\Service; use App\Entity\ExpenseReport; use Symfony\Component\Workflow\WorkflowInterface; use Symfony\Component\Workflow\Registry; readonly class ExpenseManager { public function __construct( private Registry $workflowRegistry, ) {} public function submit(ExpenseReport $expense): void { $workflow = $this->getWorkflow($expense); if ($workflow->can($expense, 'submit')) { $workflow->apply($expense, 'submit'); } else { throw new \LogicException('Cannot submit this expense report.'); } } public function approve(ExpenseReport $expense): void { $workflow = $this->getWorkflow($expense); // In a real app, you would check "Is the current user one of the allowed approvers?" here. if ($workflow->can($expense, 'approve')) { $workflow->apply($expense, 'approve'); // Check if we can auto-finalize (if 3 approvals are met) if ($workflow->can($expense, 'finalize')) { $workflow->apply($expense, 'finalize'); } } else { throw new \LogicException('Approval not needed or not allowed.'); } } public function getStatus(ExpenseReport $expense): array { // returns something like ['review_pool' => 2, 'approved_pool' => 1] return $expense->getCurrentState(); } private function getWorkflow(ExpenseReport $expense): WorkflowInterface { return $this->workflowRegistry->get($expense, 'expense_approval'); } }

The “Auto-Finalize” Logic

Notice the approve method. After applying approve, we immediately check can($expense, ‘finalize’).

  1. First Approval: \n -reviewpool: 2 \n -approvedpool: 1 \n -finalize needs 3 approved_poolcan(‘finalize’) returns false.
  2. Second Approval: \n -reviewpool: 1 \n -approvedpool: 2 \n -can(‘finalize’) returns false.
  3. Third Approval: \n reviewpool: 0 \n approvedpool: 3 \n finalize needs 3. can(‘finalize’) returns true. \n We apply finalize. \n New State:readyforpayment: 1.

Visualizing the Workflow

Before testing, it is incredibly helpful to visualize the graph, especially with weights involved. Symfony provides a dumper command.

php bin/console workflow:dump expense_approval | dot -Tpng -o workflow.png

\ You need graphviz installed on your machine to use dot. If you don’t have it, you can paste the text output into an online Graphviz viewer.

\ The output will visually represent the arrows with labels like weight: 3, making it clear that the submit transition spawns multiple tokens.

Verification (Unit Testing)

We don’t just hope it works; we prove it. We will use a KernelTestCase to load the actual workflow configuration and test the transitions.

//tests/Workflow/ExpenseApprovalWorkflowTest.php namespace App\Tests\Workflow; use App\Entity\ExpenseReport; use Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Test\KernelTestCase; use Symfony\Component\Workflow\WorkflowInterface; class ExpenseApprovalWorkflowTest extends KernelTestCase { private WorkflowInterface $workflow; protected function setUp(): void { self::bootKernel(); $container = static::getContainer(); $registry = $container->get('workflow.registry'); // We create a dummy subject to get the workflow // In a real app, passing the class name to the registry is preferred if supported, // or fetching by name directly if you have a custom service alias. $subject = new ExpenseReport('Test', 100.0); $this->workflow = $registry->get($subject, 'expense_approval'); } public function testWeightedApprovalFlow(): void { $expense = new ExpenseReport('MacBook Pro', 3000.00); // 1. Initial State $this->assertTrue($this->workflow->can($expense, 'submit')); $this->workflow->apply($expense, 'submit'); // Verify tokens: Should be in review_pool 3 times $marking = $expense->getCurrentState(); $this->assertArrayHasKey('review_pool', $marking); $this->assertEquals(3, $marking['review_pool'], 'Should have 3 pending reviews'); // 2. First Approval $this->assertTrue($this->workflow->can($expense, 'approve')); $this->workflow->apply($expense, 'approve'); $marking = $expense->getCurrentState(); $this->assertEquals(2, $marking['review_pool']); $this->assertEquals(1, $marking['approved_pool']); // Check that we CANNOT finalize yet (need 3 approvals) $this->assertFalse($this->workflow->can($expense, 'finalize'), 'Should not finalize with only 1 approval'); // 3. Second Approval $this->workflow->apply($expense, 'approve'); $marking = $expense->getCurrentState(); $this->assertEquals(1, $marking['review_pool']); $this->assertEquals(2, $marking['approved_pool']); // 4. Third Approval $this->workflow->apply($expense, 'approve'); $marking = $expense->getCurrentState(); // At this specific moment, review_pool is 0, approved_pool is 3 $this->assertEquals(0, $marking['review_pool'] ?? 0); $this->assertEquals(3, $marking['approved_pool']); // 5. Finalize $this->assertTrue($this->workflow->can($expense, 'finalize'), 'Should be able to finalize now'); $this->workflow->apply($expense, 'finalize'); // 6. Verify End State $marking = $expense->getCurrentState(); $this->assertArrayHasKey('ready_for_payment', $marking); $this->assertEquals(1, $marking['ready_for_payment']); // Previous tokens should be consumed $this->assertArrayNotHasKey('approved_pool', $marking); } }

\ Run the test:

php bin/phpunit tests/Workflow/ExpenseApprovalWorkflowTest.php

Advanced Usage & Best Practices

Using Enums for Places (New in 7.4)

Symfony 7.4 also adds support for Backed Enums in workflows. Instead of hardcoding strings like ‘review_pool’, you should define an Enum.

namespace App\Enum; enum ExpenseState: string { case DRAFT = 'draft'; case REVIEW_POOL = 'review_pool'; case APPROVED_POOL = 'approved_pool'; case READY = 'ready_for_payment'; case REJECTED = 'rejected'; }

You can then update your workflow.yaml (though YAML still uses strings, your PHP code can use ExpenseState::REVIEW_POOL->value).

Guard Events with Weights

You might want to prevent the same person from approving 3 times. Weighted transitions allow the transition approve to be called 3 times, but the workflow engine doesn’t inherently know who called it.

\ To solve this, use a Guard Listener.

#[AsEventListener('workflow.expense_approval.guard.approve')] public function preventDoubleApproval(GuardEvent $event): void { /** @var ExpenseReport $expense */ $expense = $event->getSubject(); $user = $this->security->getUser(); // Imagine the entity has a list of who already approved if ($expense->hasApproved($user)) { $event->setBlocked(true, 'You have already approved this expense.'); } }

Handling Rejection (Token Cleanup)

One challenge with weighted tokens is cleanup. If we have 2 approvals and the 3rd person calls reject, what happens to the 2 tokens sitting in approved_pool?

\ In a standard workflow, moving to rejected might leave those approved_pool tokens straggling (creating a zombie state where the report is both Rejected and Partially Approved).

\ The reject transition should ideally consume all tokens. However, dynamic consumption isn’t supported purely in YAML (you can’t say “consume ALL”).

\ Using an Event Subscriber on workflow.entered.rejected, you can manually reset the marking store.

public function onRejected(Event $event): void { $expense = $event->getSubject(); // Force reset state to ONLY rejected $expense->setCurrentState(['rejected' => 1]); }

Conclusion

Symfony 7.4’s Weighted Workflow Transitions bridge the gap between simple state management and complex Petri net logic. By allowing multiple instances of a state (tokens) to exist simultaneously, we can now model voting systems, manufacturing assembly lines, and batch processing logic directly in the configuration, drastically reducing the amount of custom PHP boilerplate required.

\ Key Takeaways:

  1. Multiplicity: Places can hold multiple tokens, allowing for parallel accumulation of state.
  2. Configuration: Use weight in your to (output) and from (input) definitions to control token flow.
  3. Storage: Ensure your Marking Store property is an array (e.g., a JSON column) to track token counts per place.
  4. Verification: Always utilize the workflow:dump command and write KernelTestCase tests to prove your graph logic before deployment.

\ This feature solidifies Symfony’s Workflow component as the premier PHP solution for state management, allowing you to delete fragile “counter” properties and rely on a mathematically sound architecture.

Let’s Be in Touch

Adopting these advanced patterns can significantly simplify your domain logic, but the transition isn’t always obvious. If you are looking to modernize your Symfony stack, need a second pair of eyes on your architecture, or just want to geek out over the latest Petri net implementations, I’d love to hear from you.

\ Let’s be in touch — connect with me on LinkedIn (https://www.linkedin.com/in/matthew-mochalkin/) to continue the conversation on modern PHP architecture.

Piyasa Fırsatı
4 Logosu
4 Fiyatı(4)
$0.02185
$0.02185$0.02185
-3.91%
USD
4 (4) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Trump Cancels Tech, AI Trade Negotiations With The UK

Trump Cancels Tech, AI Trade Negotiations With The UK

The US pauses a $41B UK tech and AI deal as trade talks stall, with disputes over food standards, market access, and rules abroad.   The US has frozen a major tech
Paylaş
LiveBitcoinNews2025/12/17 01:00
Egrag Crypto: XRP Could be Around $6 or $7 by Mid-November Based on this Analysis

Egrag Crypto: XRP Could be Around $6 or $7 by Mid-November Based on this Analysis

Egrag Crypto forecasts XRP reaching $6 to $7 by November. Fractal pattern analysis suggests a significant XRP price surge soon. XRP poised for potential growth based on historical price patterns. The cryptocurrency community is abuzz after renowned analyst Egrag Crypto shared an analysis suggesting that XRP could reach $6 to $7 by mid-November. This prediction is based on the study of a fractal pattern observed in XRP’s past price movements, which the analyst believes is likely to repeat itself in the coming months. According to Egrag Crypto, the analysis hinges on fractal patterns, which are used in technical analysis to identify recurring market behavior. Using the past price charts of XRP, the expert has found a certain fractal that looks similar to the existing market structure. The trend indicates that XRP will soon experience a great increase in price, and the asset will probably reach the $6 or $7 range in mid-November. The chart shared by Egrag Crypto points to a rising trend line with several Fibonacci levels pointing to key support and resistance zones. This technical structure, along with the fractal pattern, is the foundation of the price forecast. As XRP continues to follow the predicted trajectory, the analyst sees a strong possibility of it reaching new highs, especially if the fractal behaves as expected. Also Read: Why XRP Price Remains Stagnant Despite Fed Rate Cut #XRP – A Potential Similar Set-Up! I've been analyzing the yellow fractal from a previous setup and trying to fit it into various formations. Based on the fractal formation analysis, it suggests that by mid-November, #XRP could be around $6 to $7! Fractals can indeed be… pic.twitter.com/HmIlK77Lrr — EGRAG CRYPTO (@egragcrypto) September 18, 2025 Fractal Analysis: The Key to XRP’s Potential Surge Fractals are a popular tool for market analysis, as they can reveal trends and potential price movements by identifying patterns in historical data. Egrag Crypto’s focus on a yellow fractal pattern in XRP’s price charts is central to the current forecast. Having contrasted the market scenario at the current period and how it was at an earlier time, the analyst has indicated that XRP might revert to the same price scenario that occurred at a later cycle in the past. Egrag Crypto’s forecast of $6 to $7 is based not just on the fractal pattern but also on broader market trends and technical indicators. The Fibonacci retracements and extensions will also give more insight into the price levels that are likely to be experienced in the coming few weeks. With mid-November in sight, XRP investors and traders will be keeping a close eye on the market to see if Egrag Crypto’s analysis is true. If the price targets are reached, XRP could experience one of its most significant rallies in recent history. Also Read: Top Investor Issues Advance Warning to XRP Holders – Beware of this Risk The post Egrag Crypto: XRP Could be Around $6 or $7 by Mid-November Based on this Analysis appeared first on 36Crypto.
Paylaş
Coinstats2025/09/18 18:36
Truoux: In the Institutionalized Crypto Markets, How Investors Can Strengthen Anti-Scam Awareness

Truoux: In the Institutionalized Crypto Markets, How Investors Can Strengthen Anti-Scam Awareness

As the crypto market draws increasing attention from institutions, investors must remain vigilant, guard against various scam tactics, and rationally choose compliant
Paylaş
Techbullion2025/12/17 01:31