Moody’s plans to rate stablecoins based on the quality and type of assets backing them.Moody’s plans to rate stablecoins based on the quality and type of assets backing them.

Moody’s plans to rate stablecoins based on the quality and type of assets backing them

2025/12/13 11:21

Moody’s, a leading global agency widely recognized as one of the “big three” credit rating agencies (alongside S&P and Fitch) has announced its proposal to adopt a new approach to evaluating stablecoins. The credit rating agency adopted this suggestion as digital assets became increasingly integrated into traditional finance.

In a statement released on Friday, December 12, Moody’s announced its intention to assess the creditworthiness of stablecoin obligations carefully. Afterwards, the agency vowed to assign ratings accordingly.

To effectively carry out this plan, Moody’s noted that they will first examine each kind of asset in the reserves that supports a stablecoin. Secondly, the credit rating agency will evaluate the quality of these assets in accordance with their ratings and those of connected parties.

Moody’s proposes a new way to rate stablecoins specifically 

Moody’s new framework suggests that two tokens linked to the US dollar, which claim to be backed 1:1, could be subjected to different ratings depending on the type of assets used to back them.

Sources noted that the credit rating agency has released this suggestion at a time when several financial institutions are preparing themselves to begin embracing or boost their use of stablecoins, especially in the United States. 

Following this situation, Moody’s elaborated that “The second part of our proposed analysis would focus on market value risks by evaluating the risk associated with each reserve asset based on its type and how long until it matures.”

To expand on this statement, sources familiar with the matter highlighted that this analysis will result in the existence of advance rates that apply to each kind of asset’s value. Moreover, they acknowledged that the agency’s proposal recommends considering a stablecoin’s operational risk, liquidity risk, technology risk, and other factors when determining its rating.

As this proposal was shared with the public for feedback, reports mentioned that Tether, a financial technology company that issues the world’s largest stablecoin has received backlash in the past concerning its transparency regarding the reserves supporting its stablecoin.

To address this criticism, the fintech company took crucial steps aimed at reassuring the market. The crypto firm also made it clear that it intends to launch a stablecoin targeted at the US market soon.

Meanwhile, reports dated October noted that Tether announced it has a total of approximately $135 billion invested in US Treasuries. Regarding the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS Act) that was recently approved, reliable sources stated that the bill establishes the first comprehensive federal regulatory framework for payment stablecoins in the United States. These sources mentioned that the bill encourages issuers to maintain highly liquid reserves to back their stablecoins.

On the other hand, analysts argued that such reserves should cover safe assets, such as deposits at insured banks and US Treasury bills. 

Moody’s proposal raises heated debates among individuals 

Following Moody’s proposal, reports this week highlighted that the credit rating agency presented a strategic plan outlining how it would evaluate stablecoins. 

In this detailed plan, Moody’s stated that its “cross-sector rating methodology” would be the suitable method to apply globally to stablecoins, particularly where practices of issuing and managing this cryptocurrency are kept separate from other activities.

The agency referred to these separated assets as reserve assets. According to them, effective segregation means these reserve assets can only be utilised in meeting obligations linked to the stablecoin. This applies even if the issuer or its affiliates go bankrupt.

Notably, Moody’s reportedly created room for comments from market participants on its suggested system. The deadline for feedback is scheduled for January 26, 2026.

Get $50 free to trade crypto when you sign up to Bybit now

Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
XRP ETFs pass $1 billion mark with no outflow days since launch

XRP ETFs pass $1 billion mark with no outflow days since launch

Markets Share Share this article
Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail
XRP ETFs pass $1 billion mark with no outflo
Paylaş
Coindesk2025/12/16 19:01