Kripto Al Piyasalar Spot Vadeli İşlemler500X Birikim Etkinlikler

Daha Fazla

ELIZAOS Etkinliği2000g

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Yazar: Hackernoon

2025/09/17 23:15

Paylaş

GAME$32.9032-4.05%

Table of Links

Abstract and 1. Introduction

A free and fair economy: definition, existence and uniqueness

2.1 A free economy

2.2 A free and fair economy
Equilibrium existence in a free and fair economy

3.1 A free and fair economy as a strategic form game

3.2 Existence of an equilibrium
Equilibrium efficiency in a free and fair economy
A free economy with social justice and inclusion

5.1 Equilibrium existence and efficiency in a free economy with social justice

5.2 Choosing a reference point to achieve equilibrium efficiency
Some applications

6.1 Teamwork: surplus distribution in a firm

6.2 Contagion and self-enforcing lockdown in a networked economy

6.3 Bias in academic publishing

6.4 Exchange economies
Contributions to the closely related literature
Conclusion and References

Appendix

6.3 Bias in academic publishing

\ Well, it is straightforward to show that the researchers are symmetric under the knowledge function f. Using Anonymity and the other principles of merit-based justice, Table 13 below describes the allocation of academic articles under the allocation Sh.

:::info Authors:

(1) Ghislain H. Demeze-Jouatsa, Center for Mathematical Economics, University of Bielefeld (demeze jouatsa@uni-bielefeld.de);

(2) Roland Pongou, Department of Economics, University of Ottawa (rpongou@uottawa.ca);

(3) Jean-Baptiste Tondji, Department of Economics and Finance, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (jeanbaptiste.tondji@utrgv.edu).

:::

:::info This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license.

:::

[10] Tough the trade-off between the two quality dimensions can be viewed as a rational decision, the consequences can be detrimental to economics, as a discipline and profession. For instance, some general interest journals suffer from the “incest factor” [Heckman et al., 2017], and Akerlof [2020] shows that the tendency of rewarding “hard” topics versus“ soft ”topics in economics results in “sins of omissions” where issues that are relevant to the literature and can not be approached in a “hard” way are ignored.

Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.