NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–On December 19, 2025, Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of Paul Durkacz against the Canadian Imperial BankNEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–On December 19, 2025, Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of Paul Durkacz against the Canadian Imperial Bank

Grant & Eisenhofer Files Securities Class Action Lawsuit Against Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and Royal Bank of Canada on behalf of investors in Quantum Biopharma Ltd. Securities

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–On December 19, 2025, Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of Paul Durkacz against the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (“CIBC”) and Royal Bank of Canada (“RBC”), and their broker-dealer subsidiaries (together, the “Defendants”). The action alleges that Defendants defrauded investors by placing and executing manipulative trades designed to artificially deflate the price of Quantum Biopharma Ltd. (“Quantum”) securities.

The action is brought on behalf of all persons who sold securities of Quantum between January 6, 2021 and October 15, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”) and were damaged thereby. The action, brought in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, is captioned Paul Durkacz v. CIBC World Markets Inc., No. 1:25-cv-10565 (S.D.N.Y.).

CIBC and RBC are Canadian chartered banks whose U.S. subsidiaries are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and operate as major market makers, routinely placing and executing securities trades for investors as well as for their own trading accounts.

The complaint alleges violations of Sections 9, 10(b), and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Specifically, the lawsuit alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants engaged in a manipulative and illegal trading practice known as “spoofing,” which involves submitting and then cancelling buy or sell orders without any genuine intent to execute them. The purpose of these “baiting orders” was to mislead other market participants about the true level of supply and demand for Quantum securities, or about the stock’s price volatility, thereby influencing the market price of Quantum to benefit Defendants’ own trading positions.

Defendants entered thousands of these baiting orders on U.S. stock exchanges to create the false impression that Quantum’s stock price reflected genuine supply-and-demand and volatility dynamics, while simultaneously profiting by, among other things, purchasing Quantum securities at prices artificially depressed by their manipulative and deceptive conduct.

Investors who sold Quantum securities during the Class Period are members of this proposed Class and may be able to seek appointment as lead plaintiff, which is a court-appointed representative of the Class, by complying with the relevant provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “PSLRA”). See 15 U.S.C. Section 78u-4(a)(2)(A)(i)-(vi).

If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court by no later than February 23, 2026. You do not need to seek to become a lead plaintiff in order to share in any possible recovery. You may also retain counsel of your choice to represent you in this action.

If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights, please contact Abe Alexander at Grant & Eisenhofer at 646-722-8500, or via email at aalexander@gelaw.com.

Contacts

Media Contact:

Abe Alexander

Grant & Eisenhofer P.A.

Tel.: (646) 722-8500

aalexander@gelaw.com

Market Opportunity
Lorenzo Protocol Logo
Lorenzo Protocol Price(BANK)
$0.04874
$0.04874$0.04874
+0.08%
USD
Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

“Oversold” Solana Mirroring Previous Bottoms

“Oversold” Solana Mirroring Previous Bottoms

The post “Oversold” Solana Mirroring Previous Bottoms appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Advertisement &nbsp &nbsp Major cryptocurrency Solana is currently wandering
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/24 04:00
XRP Takes Hit as Whales Sell 1 Billion Coins, But Pro-Ripple Attorney Says XRP Will ‘Shock the World in 2026’

XRP Takes Hit as Whales Sell 1 Billion Coins, But Pro-Ripple Attorney Says XRP Will ‘Shock the World in 2026’

XRP is under pressure as broad market weakness and aggressive whale selling push the crypto into a deeper short-term decline. According to CoinMarketCap data, XRP
Share
Coinstats2025/12/24 03:56
UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

The post UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. British crypto holders may soon face a very different landscape as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) moves to expand its regulatory reach in the industry. A new consultation paper outlines how the watchdog intends to apply its rulebook to crypto firms, shaping everything from asset safeguarding to trading platform operation. According to the financial regulator, these proposals would translate into clearer protections for retail investors and stricter oversight of crypto firms. UK FCA plans Until now, UK crypto users mostly encountered the FCA through rules on promotions and anti-money laundering checks. The consultation paper goes much further. It proposes direct oversight of stablecoin issuers, custodians, and crypto-asset trading platforms (CATPs). For investors, that means the wallets, exchanges, and coins they rely on could soon be subject to the same governance and resilience standards as traditional financial institutions. The regulator has also clarified that firms need official authorization before serving customers. This condition should, in theory, reduce the risk of sudden platform failures or unclear accountability. David Geale, the FCA’s executive director of payments and digital finance, said the proposals are designed to strike a balance between innovation and protection. He explained: “We want to develop a sustainable and competitive crypto sector – balancing innovation, market integrity and trust.” Geale noted that while the rules will not eliminate investment risks, they will create consistent standards, helping consumers understand what to expect from registered firms. Why does this matter for crypto holders? The UK regulatory framework shift would provide safer custody of assets, better disclosure of risks, and clearer recourse if something goes wrong. However, the regulator was also frank in its submission, arguing that no rulebook can eliminate the volatility or inherent risks of holding digital assets. Instead, the focus is on ensuring that when consumers choose to invest, they do…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:52