Circle’s stablecoin monopoly could be the next Visa, and that’s not a compliment | Opinion

2025/07/08 16:37

Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.

Circle is rapidly cementing itself as the dominant force in the regulated stablecoin market, leveraging early regulatory alignment and powerful partnerships with payment titans such as Shopify, Mastercard, and Visa. To many observers, this signals mainstream success—evidence that crypto is finally gaining institutional legitimacy. 

Beneath the surface of this victory lies a troubling reality.

Circle’s USD Coin (USDC) is quietly positioning itself to disintermediate Visa and Mastercard, complete with all the network fees, restrictions, and monopolistic pitfalls that crypto was designed to escape.

Circle’s path to dominance

Stablecoins offer a critical alternative to traditional payments, enabling users, particularly those in emerging economies, to sidestep onerous exchange rates and transaction fees and preserve purchasing power against volatile national currencies. Circle’s increasingly dominant position risks undermining the very advantages stablecoins once promised, converting a decentralized dream into a centralized reality.

The pathway Circle has chosen is strategic and admirable in most respects. Early regulatory engagement in the United States and proactive compliance have enabled Circle to position USDC as the ‘trusted’ stablecoin among financial institutions, regulators, and mainstream consumers alike. 

It’s the stablecoin that banks can feel comfortable with, exchanges list confidently, and fintech apps eagerly integrate. Recent partnerships with global payment giants further deepen this entrenchment, embedding USDC into international payment networks and nurturing its dominance. USDC has become ubiquitous across DeFi platforms and is quickly leveraging partnerships to become just as prevalent in mainstream finance.

Do we need multiple stablecoins?

Stablecoins should offer five essential attributes: speed, affordability, ease of use, consumer safety, and scalability. They present a unique conundrum: on a fundamental level, stablecoins appear largely interchangeable—each holds identical value and similar basic functionality (though they are not fungible between different issuers). 

From a typical user’s perspective, having multiple stablecoins available might seem redundant, as market consolidation around a single fungible stablecoin can unlock economies of scale and reduce friction. Yet beneath the surface, stablecoins differ meaningfully in transaction fees, settlement times, ease of use, programmability, and accessibility. 

These differences underscore why some competition among stablecoin issuers is critical. Without competition driving providers to lower fees and optimize performance, a dominant issuer like Circle can dictate market terms to its advantage, ultimately leaving consumers with higher costs, slower transfers, and reduced choice.

Without robust incentives or competitive market forces, there’s little to ensure that more than one stablecoin issuer can remain viable. This lack of healthy competition creates the perfect conditions for monopolistic power, where a single entity like Circle gains the authority and leverage similar to credit card networks, capable of imposing unavoidable transaction fees across all stablecoin payment transactions.

While an endless buffet of stablecoins to choose from can create unintended friction for users, the alternative, a single dominant issuer that can impose practically any fees it wishes, will have far worse consequences for users. It’s essential that multiple high-quality stablecoins remain viable to prevent an unfair monopoly.

The danger of centralization and ubiquity

Centralizing control of stablecoin payment channels, Circle is setting the stage for a new era of unavoidable transaction fees—fees remarkably similar to those imposed by traditional payment networks like Visa and Mastercard. Merchants and consumers, once hopeful about crypto’s potential to disrupt fee-heavy traditional finance, may soon find themselves subject to similar tolls on stablecoin usage. 

In this emerging scenario, Circle—not governments or open blockchain protocols—dictates terms, conditions, and costs. The risk of rent-seeking behavior, extracting incremental revenue at every payment checkpoint, becomes increasingly real.

Visa and Mastercard currently dominate the global payment landscape, together collecting billions in network and interchange fees annually—fees that act as an invisible tax on global commerce. A stablecoin monopoly, particularly one held by a private issuer like Circle, creates a similar dynamic in the blockchain space. Users and merchants adopting USDC could eventually have little choice but to accept Circle’s conditions or be shut out of essential financial networks.

A restaurant can’t simply stop accepting Visa without damaging the customer experience and losing sales. USDC is quickly approaching that same level of ubiquity, and if alternative stablecoins disappear, any fees Circle imposes will become just as unavoidable.

A call for openness and competition

Proponents of Circle’s strategy often argue that regulatory compliance and mainstream integration are necessary for the mass adoption of stablecoins. To an extent, this is true. The crypto ecosystem needs legitimacy, trust, and clear legal frameworks to attract mainstream participation. However, compliance and legitimacy should never come at the expense of openness, decentralization, and choice. It’s possible—and preferable—to have both.

Ultimately, regulators, users, and crypto advocates must demand openness and competition. Regulators should promote policies that enable multiple stablecoin models to flourish, not just one. Merchants and users should embrace alternatives to dominant stablecoins like USDC, signaling to Circle and others that stablecoin adoption must not come at the cost of monopolistic pricing or restrictive terms. And the broader crypto community should advocate for protocols and standards that maintain open, interoperable, and decentralized stablecoin infrastructures.

While it’s tempting to cheer Circle’s rise as crypto’s long-awaited mainstream breakthrough, a future where stablecoins become yet another omnipresent tollbooth on digital commerce is hardly worth celebrating. If we genuinely want blockchain technology to usher in a better financial future, we must ensure stablecoins remain tools of openness, freedom, and choice, not just another unavoidable fee at the checkout.

Ron Tarter
Ron Tarter

Ron Tarter is the CEO of MNEE, a gasless, low-fee stablecoin designed to make digital dollars more accessible and usable worldwide.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

ReserveOne plans to merge with M3-Brigade and list on Nasdaq in a transaction totaling US$1 billion

ReserveOne plans to merge with M3-Brigade and list on Nasdaq in a transaction totaling US$1 billion

PANews reported on July 8 that according to GlobeNewswire , digital asset management company ReserveOne announced that it has reached a final business merger agreement with special purpose acquisition company
Share
PANews2025/07/08 20:04
European Commission publishes code of conduct for general artificial intelligence

European Commission publishes code of conduct for general artificial intelligence

PANews reported on July 10 that the European Commission: The Code of Conduct on General Artificial Intelligence has been released, which aims to help the industry comply with the legislative
Share
PANews2025/07/10 18:17
Snoop Dogg’s Digital Collectibles Generate $12M in 30 Minutes – NFTs Making a Comeback?

Snoop Dogg’s Digital Collectibles Generate $12M in 30 Minutes – NFTs Making a Comeback?

American Rapper Snoop Dogg’s newest NFTs collection achieved a complete sellout within 30 minutes, accumulating more than $12 million in sales via Telegram. Telegram’s founder, Pavel Durov, celebrated the achievement on July 9, announcing that blockchain minting capabilities and secondary market functionality would launch on the platform within 21 days. According to Durov, nearly one million unique NFTs inspired by Snoop’s distinctive aesthetic have already been purchased. 🎤 @SnoopDogg ’s digital collectibles drop on Telegram sold out in just 30 minutes today, generating $12M in sales. Nearly 1M unique NFTs inspired by Snoop’s iconic style. Blockchain minting and the secondary market go live in 21 days. It’s going to be wild. pic.twitter.com/DeinT5C2f4 — Pavel Durov (@durov) July 9, 2025 How Snoop Dogg Broke Telegram’s NFT Records The collection featured various digital assets, including “Doggs” that mirror the rapper’s likeness, priced at 200 Telegram stars each, with more than 600,000 units sold. Snoop’s signature cigar NFTs commanded 1,000 stars per piece, moving over 120,000 units. Additional collectibles, including cars and swag bags, each recorded sales exceeding 250,000 units. The rapper has promoted the Telegram NFT initiative through an official music video shared with his more than 10 million YouTube subscribers. Where yall at? 🎥 Official @telegram song music video https://t.co/4IyGHlv5SL — Snoop Dogg (@SnoopDogg) July 9, 2025 Telegram simultaneously notified its user base of over one billion about the NFT gift drops. Since Snoop Dogg joined the TON ecosystem in May, NFT activity has surged, particularly on the Telegram-based blockchain. The Telegram NFT Gifts market capitalization reached $200 million in June, accompanied by daily trading volumes exceeding $8 million. Data from Dune Analytics indicates that over 118 Telegram NFTs have been issued, with more than 263,000 unique wallets participating in trading activities. Source: Rdmcd on Dune Recent collectible launches have demonstrated even significant demand. On July 4, Crystal Eagles’ digital collectibles sold more than 15,000 pieces at $100 each within 45 seconds. Additionally, 300,000 Statues of New York Liberty sold out in under five minutes, while 500,000 Liberty Torches were purchased within 10 minutes. This is only the beginning… $TON 🗽💎 pic.twitter.com/6OdibhaiTX — Viktor 🧡 (@s0meone_u_know) July 5, 2025 Current market data indicate that the Telegram gifts market cap is $146 million, with NFT sales generating a total revenue of over $49 million. Source: Dune These developments have led industry observers to speculate that the TON blockchain may be catalyzing a revival of the NFT market, which experienced a significant downturn following its peak in 2022. Blue-Chip NFTs Flock to TON With Bored Apes Leading the Migration The credibility of TON’s NFT ecosystem received a boost on June 19 when the original Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) announced plans to launch its Bored Ape Originals sticker pack collection on Telegram. This announcement carries substantial weight, given BAYC’s market prominence. In 2022, individual BAYC NFTs sold for as much as $646,717.50 (250 ETH at the time). this BAYC just sold for $646,717.50 (250 ETH) would you rather be the buyer or the seller? pic.twitter.com/KHbK5foZym — Puff Yachty (@PuffYachty) March 8, 2022 Other prominent digital collections, including Pudgy Penguins, Doodles, and Moonbirds , have also expressed interest in deploying NFT sticker collections that preserve their distinctive brand aesthetics. According to CoinGecko data , the global NFT market is currently valued at approximately $3.7 billion, with 24-hour sales volume reaching $4.3 million. These figures surpass the August 2021 levels, when NFTs first gained mainstream attention. Source: Coingecko However, Ethereum-based collections, such as CryptoPunks and Bored Ape Yacht Club, along with Solana-based projects like Pudgy Penguins, continue to dominate the NFT market.
Share
CryptoNews2025/07/11 02:08