Zelle announced plans to expand its $1 trillion US payments network internationally using stablecoins. The plan promises to make international money transfers faster and cheaper.  Doubts arise about the initiative’s substance and whether it represents yet another banking consortium’s unsuccessful attempt to adopt blockchain technology. Zelle Moves Beyond US Borders Zelle, one of the most widely used payment networks in the United States, is going global.  Early Warning Services (EWS), the bank-owned operator of Zelle, announced today a new initiative that aims to extend its $1 trillion payments system beyond US borders by leveraging stablecoins. The plan promises to make international money transfers faster, more reliable, and less costly by leveraging blockchain-based stablecoin technology. “Zelle transformed how Americans send money at home. Now, we’re beginning the work to bring that same level of speed and reliability to Zelle consumers sending money to and from the United States, building on what we have learned from the market, our users, and our network banks and credit unions,” said EWS CEO Cameron Fowler in a press release. The move represents Zelle’s most ambitious step since its domestic launch in 2017. As consumers increasingly demand cheaper and more efficient ways to send money abroad, traditional banks are under pressure to compete.  Still, supported by major US banks such as JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America, EWS operates at a scale few fintech firms can match. However, while the announcement generated excitement among institutional players, it left many critical questions unanswered. Zelle’s Scale May Test Old Limits EWS’s announcement today lacked several key details. Fowler did not disclose whether the consortium plans to create a unified stablecoin or allow individual member banks to issue their own.  He also didn’t clarify which foreign banking partners would participate in the international rollout — a crucial detail for assessing how far Zelle’s global ambitions might reach. The project’s launch date also remains unknown, though the company offered that further announcements would arrive soon. Skeptics were quick to argue that Zelle’s stablecoin expansion runs the risk of following a familiar pattern of institutional signaling over substance. The complexity of coordinating thousands of financial institutions, each with its own risk and compliance frameworks, often leads to delays, fragmentation, or outright abandonment. Simon Taylor, a fintech analyst who discussed the topic on X, pointed to Fnality’s example to illustrate how banking consortia have historically struggled to turn blockchain initiatives into lasting, functional systems. Fnality was a project launched by a banking consortium in 2019 that sought to modernize cross-border settlements using tokenized versions of major fiat currencies like the dollar, euro, and pound. “Fnality (the utility settlement coin) was announced by 14 major banks in 2019. Still not live at scale. Getting 2,300 institutions to agree on blockchain strategy? Brutal,” Taylor wrote.  Still, Zelle occupies a unique position compared to earlier failed experiments. Its $1 trillion payment volume gives EWS a crucial advantage: distribution. The obstacle to this experiment’s success lies in whether Zelle can effectively make the tech work. If EWS can deliver a stablecoin system that truly improves cross-border payments, Zelle could help further integrate stablecoin adoption in legacy financial institutions.Zelle announced plans to expand its $1 trillion US payments network internationally using stablecoins. The plan promises to make international money transfers faster and cheaper.  Doubts arise about the initiative’s substance and whether it represents yet another banking consortium’s unsuccessful attempt to adopt blockchain technology. Zelle Moves Beyond US Borders Zelle, one of the most widely used payment networks in the United States, is going global.  Early Warning Services (EWS), the bank-owned operator of Zelle, announced today a new initiative that aims to extend its $1 trillion payments system beyond US borders by leveraging stablecoins. The plan promises to make international money transfers faster, more reliable, and less costly by leveraging blockchain-based stablecoin technology. “Zelle transformed how Americans send money at home. Now, we’re beginning the work to bring that same level of speed and reliability to Zelle consumers sending money to and from the United States, building on what we have learned from the market, our users, and our network banks and credit unions,” said EWS CEO Cameron Fowler in a press release. The move represents Zelle’s most ambitious step since its domestic launch in 2017. As consumers increasingly demand cheaper and more efficient ways to send money abroad, traditional banks are under pressure to compete.  Still, supported by major US banks such as JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America, EWS operates at a scale few fintech firms can match. However, while the announcement generated excitement among institutional players, it left many critical questions unanswered. Zelle’s Scale May Test Old Limits EWS’s announcement today lacked several key details. Fowler did not disclose whether the consortium plans to create a unified stablecoin or allow individual member banks to issue their own.  He also didn’t clarify which foreign banking partners would participate in the international rollout — a crucial detail for assessing how far Zelle’s global ambitions might reach. The project’s launch date also remains unknown, though the company offered that further announcements would arrive soon. Skeptics were quick to argue that Zelle’s stablecoin expansion runs the risk of following a familiar pattern of institutional signaling over substance. The complexity of coordinating thousands of financial institutions, each with its own risk and compliance frameworks, often leads to delays, fragmentation, or outright abandonment. Simon Taylor, a fintech analyst who discussed the topic on X, pointed to Fnality’s example to illustrate how banking consortia have historically struggled to turn blockchain initiatives into lasting, functional systems. Fnality was a project launched by a banking consortium in 2019 that sought to modernize cross-border settlements using tokenized versions of major fiat currencies like the dollar, euro, and pound. “Fnality (the utility settlement coin) was announced by 14 major banks in 2019. Still not live at scale. Getting 2,300 institutions to agree on blockchain strategy? Brutal,” Taylor wrote.  Still, Zelle occupies a unique position compared to earlier failed experiments. Its $1 trillion payment volume gives EWS a crucial advantage: distribution. The obstacle to this experiment’s success lies in whether Zelle can effectively make the tech work. If EWS can deliver a stablecoin system that truly improves cross-border payments, Zelle could help further integrate stablecoin adoption in legacy financial institutions.

Zelle Expands Abroad With Stablecoins, But Details Remain Elusive

2025/10/25 12:49

Zelle announced plans to expand its $1 trillion US payments network internationally using stablecoins. The plan promises to make international money transfers faster and cheaper. 

Doubts arise about the initiative’s substance and whether it represents yet another banking consortium’s unsuccessful attempt to adopt blockchain technology.

Zelle Moves Beyond US Borders

Zelle, one of the most widely used payment networks in the United States, is going global. 

Early Warning Services (EWS), the bank-owned operator of Zelle, announced today a new initiative that aims to extend its $1 trillion payments system beyond US borders by leveraging stablecoins.

The plan promises to make international money transfers faster, more reliable, and less costly by leveraging blockchain-based stablecoin technology.

The move represents Zelle’s most ambitious step since its domestic launch in 2017. As consumers increasingly demand cheaper and more efficient ways to send money abroad, traditional banks are under pressure to compete. 

Still, supported by major US banks such as JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America, EWS operates at a scale few fintech firms can match.

However, while the announcement generated excitement among institutional players, it left many critical questions unanswered.

Zelle’s Scale May Test Old Limits

EWS’s announcement today lacked several key details. Fowler did not disclose whether the consortium plans to create a unified stablecoin or allow individual member banks to issue their own. 

He also didn’t clarify which foreign banking partners would participate in the international rollout — a crucial detail for assessing how far Zelle’s global ambitions might reach.

The project’s launch date also remains unknown, though the company offered that further announcements would arrive soon.

Skeptics were quick to argue that Zelle’s stablecoin expansion runs the risk of following a familiar pattern of institutional signaling over substance. The complexity of coordinating thousands of financial institutions, each with its own risk and compliance frameworks, often leads to delays, fragmentation, or outright abandonment.

Simon Taylor, a fintech analyst who discussed the topic on X, pointed to Fnality’s example to illustrate how banking consortia have historically struggled to turn blockchain initiatives into lasting, functional systems.

Fnality was a project launched by a banking consortium in 2019 that sought to modernize cross-border settlements using tokenized versions of major fiat currencies like the dollar, euro, and pound.

Still, Zelle occupies a unique position compared to earlier failed experiments. Its $1 trillion payment volume gives EWS a crucial advantage: distribution.

The obstacle to this experiment’s success lies in whether Zelle can effectively make the tech work. If EWS can deliver a stablecoin system that truly improves cross-border payments, Zelle could help further integrate stablecoin adoption in legacy financial institutions.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

What the U.S. shutdown tells us about market resilience

What the U.S. shutdown tells us about market resilience

The post What the U.S. shutdown tells us about market resilience appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. During the U.S. federal government shutdown that began on October 1, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) went into contingency staffing mode. Almost a hundred crypto ETF decisions got stuck in approval limbo as a result, and key economic-data releases from agencies such as the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the U.S. Census Bureau were paused. For crypto, that blackout became an unscripted stress test, as the industry suddenly lost its usual regulatory support elements. And given that the crypto market often prides itself on being decentralized and self-sufficient, this is a moment of truth where it can prove that claim. How do crypto traders, exchanges, and issuers perform when oversight suddenly vanishes? Let’s take a look. What Actually Pauses in a U.S. Shutdown: ETF and token-filing reviews: Routine processing of ETF and token registration documents is largely suspended, as reflected by the SEC announcement. Issuer communications: Many correspondence channels between the SEC and registrants are inactive during the shutdown. Federal data releases: Reports such as jobs, inflation, and trade data are delayed, per Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics notices prior to the shutdown. A Pause in Oversight, Not in Action The shutdown didn’t just stop new rules; it halted everything that gives the market structure and visibility. And with enforcement activity slowing to a crawl, that leaves crypto issuers, exchanges, and traders navigating the silence on their own terms. For issuers, it’s an exercise in patience. There’s nothing to do but wait. Projects with pending ETF or token applications simply can’t move forward, no matter how ready they may be. Bureaucratic timeouts don’t discriminate — they hit all momentum equally. Exchanges, meanwhile, are keeping steady. The more experienced ones understand that running smoothly during a regulatory blackout is the best insurance policy. If anything goes wrong…
Share
2025/10/26 12:03