TLDR Shibarium’s TVL has stayed below $1 million since early October 2025. SHIB’s total supply remains near 589 trillion tokens despite burn efforts. Capital is shifting from meme tokens to AI and DePIN utility projects. SHIB token burns surged 42,000% in 24 hours but price gains were limited. Shiba Inu (SHIB) is struggling to recover [...] The post Shiba Inu Faces Utility Crisis as Shibarium TVL Remains Under $1M appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR Shibarium’s TVL has stayed below $1 million since early October 2025. SHIB’s total supply remains near 589 trillion tokens despite burn efforts. Capital is shifting from meme tokens to AI and DePIN utility projects. SHIB token burns surged 42,000% in 24 hours but price gains were limited. Shiba Inu (SHIB) is struggling to recover [...] The post Shiba Inu Faces Utility Crisis as Shibarium TVL Remains Under $1M appeared first on CoinCentral.

Shiba Inu Faces Utility Crisis as Shibarium TVL Remains Under $1M

2025/10/28 15:43

TLDR

  • Shibarium’s TVL has stayed below $1 million since early October 2025.
  • SHIB’s total supply remains near 589 trillion tokens despite burn efforts.
  • Capital is shifting from meme tokens to AI and DePIN utility projects.
  • SHIB token burns surged 42,000% in 24 hours but price gains were limited.

Shiba Inu (SHIB) is struggling to recover its price due to deeper issues within its ecosystem. Despite ongoing community support, SHIB faces major challenges tied to its large token supply and weak network use. The Total Value Locked (TVL) on its layer-2 solution, Shibarium, has stayed under $1 million for weeks. Analysts say this low TVL shows that SHIB lacks utility, and without change, price goals remain out of reach.

Shibarium’s Low TVL Signals Limited Network Usage

Shibarium, SHIB’s layer-2 blockchain, was launched to bring more activity and token utility to the ecosystem. It was also designed to support token burns, helping reduce SHIB’s massive circulating supply of about 589 trillion. However, the network’s TVL has stayed below $1 million since early October 2025. According to DeFiLlama data, this is far below what is needed to create any real momentum.

A low TVL means there is very little value locked in the network’s applications, such as decentralized exchanges or lending protocols. Without strong user activity or developer interest, SHIB’s burn rate remains slow. This is creating a supply overhang that continues to weigh down the token’s price, which currently trades well below $0.0001. Analysts argue this weak burn rate is a key reason why price recovery seems unlikely in the near term.

Capital Rotation Toward Utility-Focused Sectors

The broader crypto market is now favoring projects with real-world use cases. SHIB is losing investor attention as capital flows toward utility-based sectors like artificial intelligence and decentralized physical infrastructure networks (DePIN). These sectors are offering clearer revenue paths and developer activity, drawing funds away from meme tokens.

Bitfarms and other blockchain firms have shifted toward AI-powered solutions, gaining interest from both retail and institutional investors. In contrast, SHIB’s association with its meme origins and its underused blockchain have made it harder to retain investor confidence. Analysts note that the shift in market behavior is making it more difficult for meme-based tokens to attract fresh capital unless they provide functional products.

Community Push for Token Burns Not Enough

The SHIB community remains active, continuing to support efforts to reduce token supply through burns. One recent surge in token burns reached over 42,000% in 24 hours, briefly lifting the token’s price to $0.00001062. While these events garner short-term attention, they do not address the underlying issue of weak utility.

Burn efforts tied to Shibarium rely on the network being used for real transactions, which currently is not happening at scale. The low TVL shows that the demand for network usage remains minimal, and that makes it hard to sustain meaningful deflation. Without more usage, burn rates will not rise enough to reduce the supply in a way that can move the price long-term.

Competition from Newer Projects Intensifies Pressure

Newer meme tokens are entering the market with more aggressive burn models and added features. One recent example, “Shib on Base,” gained attention for combining a 32.6% burn with AI-based functions. These projects are now viewed as more attractive by some investors seeking faster returns.

This growing competition means SHIB must adapt or risk losing more market share. Analysts stress that to remain relevant, the SHIB team needs to bring more developers and liquidity to Shibarium. Increasing the TVL is seen as the first step in proving that the chain can support real applications and become a competitive part of the Web3 space.

The post Shiba Inu Faces Utility Crisis as Shibarium TVL Remains Under $1M appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

No L2s, No Mass Adoption. Period.

No L2s, No Mass Adoption. Period.

ETH Can’t Do It Alone ETH mainnet is powerful but let’s be honest, it’s pricey AF. $50 swaps, $100 NFT mints. Perfect for whales flexing, useless for billions of everyday users. That’s why Layer 2s (L2s) exist. They’re Ethereum’s highways: same security, but faster and dirt cheap. No L2s = crypto stays niche. With them, ETH finally goes global. Why Ethereum Alone Can’t Scale 2021 gas fees were brutal. People spent rent money on swaps. NFT mints sometimes cost more than the art. Ethereum nailed security, but it was locked behind insane fees. Rollups solved that by bundling transactions, compressing data, and anchoring it back to Ethereum. Think of ETH as the courthouse. L2s are the highways around it. Same rules, way more traffic can flow. Rollups Two main flavors run the show: Optimistic Rollups (Arbitrum, Optimism): “Innocent until proven guilty.” Transactions go through unless someone proves fraud. Efficient, but withdrawals to mainnet take ~7 days. ZK Rollups (zkSync, Starknet, Scroll): “Math doesn’t lie.” Validity is proved upfront with cryptography. Harder tech, but faster and more secure. Either way → fees drop from $20 to cents. That’s the unlock. Why L2s Matter for Mass Adoption Mass adoption = billions of cheap, everyday transactions. That’s impossible on L1, but normal on L2. DeFi: Swapping $50 shouldn’t cost $20. On L2s, anyone can farm, lend, and trade. Gaming + NFTs: $5 skins, collectibles, and in-game items actually make sense. SocialFi: Billions of likes, tips, and posts daily. Reddit already runs Community Points on Arbitrum Nova. Without L2s, Ethereum is boutique. With them, it becomes global infrastructure. It’s Already Happening Arbitrum: The DeFi king. GMX, Radiant, Uniswap all live here. Nova powers gaming + social. The BoLD upgrade decentralizes validation. Optimism: Playing the meta game. The OP Stack lets anyone spin up an L2. Coinbase’s Base, Zora, Worldcoin all sparks from the same match. Together = the Superchain. ZK Rollups: zkSync, Starknet, Scroll are still early, but building for instant, trustless scaling. Then came Dencun (2024). Ethereum introduced blobs, slashing L2 fees by ~95%. Overnight, “cheap” became “basically free.” The Messy Bits 👀 L2s are the backbone, but they’re not perfect: Sequencers = Central chokepoints. Today, one operator orders all transactions. Risk of censorship + MEV capture is real. Optimism is testing “shared sequencers.” Espresso + Astria are building neutral ones. Bridges = Speed vs. trust. Optimistic rollups force a 7 day wait. Fast bridges fix UX but add risk over $2B lost in hacks shows the danger. ZK rollups may cut this, but proofs are still heavy. Liquidity = Fragmentation risk. Superchain sounds , but liquidity could scatter across 20 OP chains. Imagine Uniswap split across Base, Zora, Optimism. Without cross-chain messaging, composability breaks. Governance = Growing pains. Arbitrum DAO controls ~$3B, but drama over 750M ARB transfers showed fragility. Optimism’s RetroPGF funds public goods after impact bold but unproven long term. The Road Ahead For L2s to truly onboard billions, three things must click: Decentralized Sequencers → no single chokepoint. Seamless Interop → bridging feels invisible. Invisible UX → normies don’t care what chain they’re on. When that happens, no one says “I bridged to Arbitrum.” They just say: “I sent crypto. It was instant. It was cheap.” Final Take Ethereum is the air. Without it, nothing runs. L2s are the engines. They move the people, the culture, the transactions. No L2s = crypto stays niche. With L2s = we onboard billions. They’re not a side quest. They’re the backbone of Ethereum’s future. Period. Key Takeaways Ethereum is secure but too expensive to scale alone. L2s bundle transactions and slash fees by 95%+. Arbitrum leads DeFi today, while Optimism builds the Superchain for tomorrow. ZK rollups are early but promise instant security at scale. Main challenges: sequencer centralization, bridge risks, liquidity fragmentation, DAO politics. Long-term success depends on decentralization, interop, and invisible UX. Bottom line: No L2s, no mass adoption. With them, Ethereum scales to billions. No L2s, No Mass Adoption. Period. was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
2025/09/22 15:18