The post Paxos Technical Error Creates $300 Trillion PYUSD: Confirms Mint Was Internal Error, Not a Hack appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. At 3:12 PM EST, blockchain watchers froze as Paxos, the regulated issuer behind PayPal USD (PYUSD), mistakenly minted $300 trillion worth of PYUSD in a single transaction. Just 22 minutes later, the entire amount was burned, as if it never happened. The company quickly issued a statement clarifying the cause: “This was an internal technical error. There is no security breach. Customer funds are safe. We have addressed the root cause.” @Paxos, October 15, 2025 At 3:12 PM EST, Paxos mistakenly minted excess PYUSD as part of an internal transfer. Paxos immediately identified the error and burned the excess PYUSD. This was an internal technical error. There is no security breach. Customer funds are safe. We have addressed the root… — Paxos (@Paxos) October 15, 2025 What Really Happened The massive mint originated from Paxos’ official wallet, confirming it was an internal mistake, not a hack. According to on-chain data, the tokens were created in a single transaction, likely due to a configuration or input error, something as simple as typing the wrong number during an internal test or system update. On Ethereum, the mint and burn were both visible to the public, allowing anyone to track the sequence in real time. The transparency of blockchain made the event both shocking and oddly reassuring, a trillion-dollar error that everyone could see, and everyone could verify was fixed. Within minutes, crypto Twitter exploded. Analysts and traders scrambled to confirm whether the $300 trillion mint was real, while others joked that PayPal had briefly overtaken Apple, Microsoft, and even entire global economies in value. “For about 20 minutes, PayPal was the richest company on Earth.” @pukerrainbrow For about 20 minutes, PayPal became the richest company on Earth. Paxos accidentally minted $300 trillion in PYUSD… before burning it all like nothing happened. But… The post Paxos Technical Error Creates $300 Trillion PYUSD: Confirms Mint Was Internal Error, Not a Hack appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. At 3:12 PM EST, blockchain watchers froze as Paxos, the regulated issuer behind PayPal USD (PYUSD), mistakenly minted $300 trillion worth of PYUSD in a single transaction. Just 22 minutes later, the entire amount was burned, as if it never happened. The company quickly issued a statement clarifying the cause: “This was an internal technical error. There is no security breach. Customer funds are safe. We have addressed the root cause.” @Paxos, October 15, 2025 At 3:12 PM EST, Paxos mistakenly minted excess PYUSD as part of an internal transfer. Paxos immediately identified the error and burned the excess PYUSD. This was an internal technical error. There is no security breach. Customer funds are safe. We have addressed the root… — Paxos (@Paxos) October 15, 2025 What Really Happened The massive mint originated from Paxos’ official wallet, confirming it was an internal mistake, not a hack. According to on-chain data, the tokens were created in a single transaction, likely due to a configuration or input error, something as simple as typing the wrong number during an internal test or system update. On Ethereum, the mint and burn were both visible to the public, allowing anyone to track the sequence in real time. The transparency of blockchain made the event both shocking and oddly reassuring, a trillion-dollar error that everyone could see, and everyone could verify was fixed. Within minutes, crypto Twitter exploded. Analysts and traders scrambled to confirm whether the $300 trillion mint was real, while others joked that PayPal had briefly overtaken Apple, Microsoft, and even entire global economies in value. “For about 20 minutes, PayPal was the richest company on Earth.” @pukerrainbrow For about 20 minutes, PayPal became the richest company on Earth. Paxos accidentally minted $300 trillion in PYUSD… before burning it all like nothing happened. But…

Paxos Technical Error Creates $300 Trillion PYUSD: Confirms Mint Was Internal Error, Not a Hack

2025/10/16 22:13

At 3:12 PM EST, blockchain watchers froze as Paxos, the regulated issuer behind PayPal USD (PYUSD), mistakenly minted $300 trillion worth of PYUSD in a single transaction.

Just 22 minutes later, the entire amount was burned, as if it never happened.

The company quickly issued a statement clarifying the cause:

@Paxos, October 15, 2025

What Really Happened

The massive mint originated from Paxos’ official wallet, confirming it was an internal mistake, not a hack. According to on-chain data, the tokens were created in a single transaction, likely due to a configuration or input error, something as simple as typing the wrong number during an internal test or system update.

On Ethereum, the mint and burn were both visible to the public, allowing anyone to track the sequence in real time. The transparency of blockchain made the event both shocking and oddly reassuring, a trillion-dollar error that everyone could see, and everyone could verify was fixed.

Within minutes, crypto Twitter exploded. Analysts and traders scrambled to confirm whether the $300 trillion mint was real, while others joked that PayPal had briefly overtaken Apple, Microsoft, and even entire global economies in value.

Despite the chaos, Paxos’ quick response prevented any lasting market disruption. PYUSD’s price briefly dipped, even showing a 100% flash crash on some DeFi dashboards, but it quickly stabilized once confirmation of the burn surfaced.

Stablecoins like PYUSD are built on the promise of security, stability, and full backing by fiat reserves. Seeing a mint of $300 trillion out of thin air, even temporarily, raised fresh questions about centralization and control in regulated stablecoin systems.

@pukerrainbrow summed up the sentiment well:

The incident exposed how much power is concentrated in the hands of issuers, even compliant, institution-backed ones like Paxos. Unlike decentralized assets such as Bitcoin, stablecoins depend on trusted intermediaries to manage minting, burning, and reserves.

The Market Reaction Around The Development

Shortly after the minting event, major DeFi protocols moved fast. Aave temporarily paused PYUSD markets as a precaution against potential contagion. Other platforms followed suit, waiting for on-chain confirmation that the mint was reversed.

@omeragoldberg

Once Paxos burned the erroneous supply and re-minted a smaller, verified amount for regular operations, confidence returned. The PYUSD peg remained stable, and trading volumes normalized within hours.

The Technical Breakdown

Here’s what blockchain data revealed:

  •  Time of event: 3:12 PM EST, Oct 15, 2025
  •  Minted amount: ~$300 trillion PYUSD
  •  Burned: Entire amount, 22 minutes later
  •  Source wallet: Paxos official issuer address
  •  Duration of anomaly: ~22 minutes
  •  Cause: Internal system error during a transfer operation
  •  Impact: Temporary suspension of PYUSD markets on select DeFi platforms

According to developers familiar with ERC-20 token standards, such an incident likely stemmed from a misconfigured minting script or automated process, not a security breach. Since mint and burn permissions are tightly restricted to the issuer’s contract, no external actor could have triggered it.

While the mint had no financial impact, it became one of the most viral events in DeFi history. It exposed how human or software errors can cascade into astronomical figures, and how the public, immutable nature of blockchain makes these errors impossible to hide.

For many, it was a case study in both transparency and trust:

  •  The mistake was visible to everyone, the blockchain didn’t lie.
  •  The response was fast, demonstrating accountability.
  •  The system self-corrected, without requiring user intervention.

It also reignited a debate about centralization risks in stablecoins. Unlike algorithmic stablecoins (which rely on market mechanics), fiat-backed tokens like PYUSD depend on centralized mint/burn authority, meaning a single wrong command can briefly distort supply data, even if the real-world backing remains unchanged.

Aftermath and Lessons Learned

By the end of the day, Paxos had:

  •  Confirmed the error was internal.
  •  Burned all excess tokens.
  •  Re-minted a correct operational balance.
  •  Coordinated with PayPal and DeFi platforms to resume normal operations.

Markets quickly moved on. PYUSD’s market cap, as per [CoinMarketCap](https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/paypal-usd/), remained around $2.64 billion, unchanged from before the event.

Still, the incident will go down as one of those “only-in-crypto” moments, where a typo could theoretically create the world’s largest company, and blockchain’s transparency ensures the world sees it happen live.

The “$300 trillion mint” was more than a glitch. It was a reminder of both how fragile and how robust blockchain systems can be. One line of code created unimaginable wealth, and 22 minutes later, another line erased it.

In traditional finance, such an error might stay hidden for months. In crypto, it played out in full public view, corrected in real time, with the blockchain itself serving as the ultimate audit trail.

Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services.

Follow us on Twitter @nulltxnews to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, Distributed Computing, and Metaverse news!

Source: https://nulltx.com/paxos-technical-error-creates-300-trillion-pyusd-confirms-mint-was-internal-error-not-a-hack/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Ethereum’s ERC-8004 Brings AI-Driven Economic Potential

Ethereum’s ERC-8004 Brings AI-Driven Economic Potential

The post Ethereum’s ERC-8004 Brings AI-Driven Economic Potential appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: ERC-8004 launch by Cobo enables AI as economic entities in crypto. No immediate market impact noted yet. Potential for significant future Ethereum ecosystem evolution. Cobo’s co-founder Fish the Godfish introduced a groundbreaking crypto stack—x402, AP2, and ERC-8004—on September 17th, enabling AI agents to transact as economic entities officially. This technical advancement fosters new machine involvement in economic activities within Ethereum, anticipated to alter future DeFi landscapes, despite no current financial or market impact observed. ERC-8004 and AI: Transforming Ethereum Transactions Cobo’s ERC-8004 aims to transform the cryptocurrency landscape by allowing AI agents to engage in economic activities, introducing a stack that interlinks x402 and AP2 for seamless transactions. Fish the Godfish, the primary architect of this initiative, has highlighted the potential for AI to evolve into true economic agents, changing how transactions are approached in blockchain ecosystems. The introduction of this stack is a technological milestone, though no immediate financial impact has surfaced. The stack positions Ethereum as a hub for machine-led commerce, foreshadowing future changes in decentralized finance and smart contract applications. When AI learns to spend: From x402 to AP2, and then to ERC-8004, explore how to make the Agent a true economic entity. — Fish the Godfish, Co-founder and CEO of Cobo Reactions to the announcement have been cautiously optimistic, with many in the community anticipating advancements, although industry influencers have yet to comment. This caution suggests that while the technical potential is acknowledged, its market and practical impacts remain speculative. Ethereum’s Evolution: AI Agents and Market Dynamics Did you know? ERC-8004, hailed as a significant advancement, has historical parallels with early smart contract technologies that first enabled programmable transactions on blockchains. Ethereum (ETH) is valued at $3,957.24 with a market cap of 477,631,941,155. Its 24-hour trading volume is $15.36 billion, showing a -55.14% change,…
Share
2025/10/26 07:35
XRP (XRP) Faces Potential Downturn as Death Cross Pattern Re-emerges

XRP (XRP) Faces Potential Downturn as Death Cross Pattern Re-emerges

The post XRP (XRP) Faces Potential Downturn as Death Cross Pattern Re-emerges appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ted Hisokawa Oct 24, 2025 16:07 XRP is on the brink of forming a ‘death cross’ pattern, reminiscent of its 65% crash in 2021. Experts warn of potential risks including falling burn rate and insider selling. The price of XRP, the cryptocurrency developed by Ripple, is currently navigating a challenging phase, marked by a significant decline from its peak earlier this year. According to CoinMarketCap, XRP has dropped by 34% from its highest point, situating it firmly within a bearish market. Death Cross Pattern and Historical Context A looming ‘death cross’ pattern on the daily chart is raising alarms among analysts. This technical chart pattern, which occurs when a short-term moving average crosses below a long-term moving average, has historically signaled a potential downturn. The last instance of this pattern for XRP was in 2021, leading to a dramatic 65% price drop. Current Market Conditions As of October 23, XRP was trading at $2.4137, a price level that reflects recent volatility and market consolidation. This price action is consistent with broader trends observed across the altcoin market, where significant price swings have been common since early October. Despite these challenges, XRP remains a key player in the cryptocurrency space, backed by robust fundamentals. Additional Risks for XRP Beyond the technical patterns, XRP faces other risks that could impact its price. Notably, the burn rate for the token is declining, which could affect its perceived scarcity and value. Furthermore, insider selling has been flagged as a potential concern, possibly contributing to downward pressure on the price. Market Developments and Future Outlook In contrast to the current bearish sentiment, Ripple’s ecosystem continues to expand. The recent launch of the REX-Oprey XRP ETF has been a significant milestone, quickly surpassing $100 million in assets. This…
Share
2025/10/26 07:24