Lessons in TV Platform Design from a Streaming Industry Insider

2025/08/28 14:43

Hey everyone who is reading the article! I am Kristina Misko, product design team lead and product designer at streaming service. I’ve been working at it for the last three years, and it’s time tp share my experience and cases my team and I went through designing for TV platform.

I have decided to start from a very common, yet necessary basis which product designers will need at their practice when they just start working with TV platform. In this article I will share all the guidelines I personally studied when I just became a product designer for a streaming service.

Why TV Design Matters

There are a lot of dribble designs for web&mobile and a majority of courses for these platforms, yet there is the other platform which users are also very sticky to and to which we have less materials and design cases in the community. As a streaming service product designer, I personally adore TV platform for its peculiarities, technical issues and UX patterns which we build every day. The article reveals peculiarities and facts about designing for TV which we experience while creating design for the platform, but let’s start with numbers. According to the studies of Nielsen, streaming is more popular than either cable or broadcast, demanding 38.1% of total TV usage, and I’m sure the numbers will raise year by year. So, let’s observe, what’s it like to create the product for TV.

The main difference between TV and other platforms which influences all other aspects of product design for the platform is context. The context of when and why people turn on TV, whether they are alone, had a stressful day or there is a company of friends. The context creates special conditions which we must pay attention to. For example, we shouldn’t ask our user to go through a long flow of authorization on TV because a person had a long day full of work, stress, so let’s navigate them to the mobile app where the process will be faster, yet the result will be successful — a complete authorization on TV + a retention to the mobile app.

Another difference is remote control as a way to navigate through the device. It implies its own rules which I will cover later in the article. But taking theses two issues into consideration, you can already say that TV Design has its own hacks.

Start with the Official Guidelines… and Then Go Beyond

Your first stop should be the platform guidelines. Apple, Google and TV manufacturers all publish recommended interface patterns and technical constraints. Here are a few I keep bookmarked:

  • Apple tvOS Human Interface Guidelines — Apple emphasises motion, depth and focus for a cohesive TV experience.
  • Android TV Design Guidelines — Google offers advice on scaling mobile patterns to TV and warns against effects (like blur) that low‑end devices can’t handle.
  • Smart TV Guides (webOS) — LG and Samsung explain how to leverage features such as parallax, gradients and rounded corners on their platforms.

These documents will tell you what’s possible on each platform. They won’t, however, tell you how to make your app delightful across many different devices. That’s where hard‑won experience comes in.

Lessons Learned Designing for TV

Hardware Diversity Is Real

Not all TVs are created equal. Some stuffed with the Voice Assistant, navigated by Air Mouse and powerful enough to maintain animations and gradients, and there is a plenty of devices whose capabilities are less fascinating . The last ones are not technically capable of other corner radius than 0, animations, gradients and parallax.

The decision we stick at our streaming service is design for the lowest common TV set and add enhancements only when you can detect that the hardware can handle them. How to do that? Test the devices, be in a close chain with TV developing stream and always ask for the feedback from them.

“The Ten‑Foot Rule”

Everything on TV needs to be legible from about three metres away. I learned to bump up font sizes (20-24 px and above), increase contrast and limit dense blocks of text. Onboarding screens, tutorials and payment flows deserve extra attention because they often contain instructions or sensitive data.

A perfect example of such rule is a communicative screen, a screen where we sold a user a subscription or give offers. It usually has not many text, but it should be readable from the distance because if not, we’ll lose users’ attention.

Focus Is the New Tap

On mobile, users tap to indicate intent. On TV, they navigate using arrows and rely on a focus state to see where they are. I experimented with several focus indicators — colour changes, borders, scaling and shadows. In the end, a combination of subtle scaling and colour change felt the most consistent across devices. Shadows look great on a flagship OLED, but many budget TVs simply drop them.

Remote‑Control Navigation Forces Simplicity

Navigation is limited to up/down/left/right and an OK button. So, the basic rule here is to simplify information architecture and develop it for the TVs with a good Voice assistant or Magic Remote. For example, I added such option in one of my recent designs for Search — you may search for the content AND for the Purchases, Continue watching list, etc. as well.

Less Is More

Most viewers turn on the TV after work, so cognitive load is low. My team deliberately reduced the number of steps needed to find something to watch. We prioritised personal recommendations and a prominent Continue Watching section. Complex tasks like account creation or entering payment details were handed off to mobile or web flows via QR codes.

One Design, Many Operating Systems

TVs run a handful of operating systems: Apple’s tvOS, Android TV/Google TV, LG webOS, Samsung’s Tizen and even gaming consoles. Capabilities vary widely. To avoid maintaining multiple codebases, we built a design system that could degrade gracefully. Here are some tips about each platform:

  • TVOS (Apple). There are no design limitations that I personally know. Since it is the same code base for Apple TV and iOS, restrictions for mobile and tv platforms will be the same.
  • ATV (Android TV). Android TV is represented with Smart aTV like Xiaomi and Sony, and common aTVs. Designing for aTV, remember that there are TVs that do not maintain blur (for example, Xiaomi Stick). However, corner cases aside, if the design works perfectly for the mobile platform, it would probably work for the aTV as well. \n Here are some links that may help you understand aTV more:
  • Design for Android TV;
  • More guidelines about designing for Android TV.
  • SmartTV (WebOS). SmartTVs with webOS are manifactured by such companies as LG and Samsung. I’d say this platform is on the top among others because of its design capabilities — blur, gradients, radius corners and even shadows may be implemented there. Also, you may include slight animations from screen to screen. However, from my personal experience, SmartTV has more limitations than ATV because of the load the app takes to maintain all the design, so I usually stick to simplifying design for SmartTV and let the app not to crush.

Putting It All Together

Designing for TV is like designing a living‑room appliance. It requires empathy for the viewer’s context and respect for the hardware’s limits. My process looks something like this:

  1. Research — Review platform guidelines, watch people use existing TV apps and identify pain points.
  2. Design for the worst case — Start with a basic layout and visual style that works on the weakest hardware.
  3. Layer on polish — Add motion, blur, depth and other enhancements for devices that can support them.
  4. Test on real TVs — Emulators are helpful but cannot replicate remote lag or subtle rendering differences.
  5. Iterate based on feedback — Collect data from real users and the developers. A small change in navigation can drastically affect engagement, and less Lottie may significantly affect the app’s lifetime per session.

Welllllll, thank you for reading till the end, hope the article was useful for you. If you find it interesting, don’t hesitate and share it with your colleagues. In case you want to know more about TV platforms or designing tips for TV platform — let me know, I’ll cover the cases where I got stumbled on.

\

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Bitcoin Selling Pressure: Crucial Analysis Reveals Short-Term Holder Impact

Bitcoin Selling Pressure: Crucial Analysis Reveals Short-Term Holder Impact

BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Selling Pressure: Crucial Analysis Reveals Short-Term Holder Impact The world of cryptocurrency is constantly evolving, presenting both exciting opportunities and significant challenges. Currently, a key dynamic is influencing the market: substantial Bitcoin selling pressure. Understanding this pressure, especially from short-term holders, is absolutely crucial for anyone involved in the crypto space. On-chain analytics firm Glassnode has recently provided insightful data that sheds light on why BTC might be struggling to gain significant upward momentum at its current levels. What’s Driving the Intense Bitcoin Selling Pressure? According to Glassnode’s comprehensive analysis, Bitcoin (BTC) is currently trading within a very specific and challenging price corridor. This range, spanning approximately $113,600 to $115,600, isn’t just arbitrary; it represents the average purchase price for a significant cohort of short-term holders. These are individuals who acquired their Bitcoin relatively recently, typically within the last one to three months. For these newer investors, the current market price means their investments are effectively “underwater” – they are holding Bitcoin at a loss compared to their initial cost basis. This situation creates a powerful, almost gravitational, market dynamic: Break-Even Motivation: As BTC’s price attempts to rebound and approaches this critical range, many short-term holders are motivated to sell. Their primary goal is often to “break even” on their investment or to cut their losses before they deepen. Supply Overhang: This collective desire to exit or reduce exposure at cost creates a substantial “supply overhang.” Essentially, there are many sellers waiting at these specific price points. Resistance Formation: Consequently, this range acts as a formidable resistance level. Any upward price movement is met with a wave of sell orders, making it incredibly difficult for Bitcoin to push through and establish higher highs in the short term. This persistent Bitcoin selling pressure from short-term holders is a significant factor limiting immediate upside potential. Why Do Short-Term Holders Influence BTC So Much? The actions of short-term holders carry considerable weight in the market, especially during periods of price consolidation. Unlike long-term holders, who possess a stronger conviction and often ride out market volatility, short-term holders are generally more reactive. Their investment strategies are often focused on quicker gains or minimizing short-term losses. When a large segment of this group finds their positions in the red, their collective sentiment can quickly shift from optimism to a desire for capital preservation. This isn’t necessarily a sign of weakness in Bitcoin itself, but rather a natural market cleansing process. It highlights the importance of understanding market psychology and the different investor cohorts at play. The current Bitcoin selling pressure illustrates how crucial it is to monitor these on-chain metrics. Navigating This Challenging Market: What Can Investors Do? For both seasoned and new investors, understanding the implications of this analysis is key to making informed decisions. The current environment, marked by significant Bitcoin selling pressure, calls for a strategic approach. Consider these actionable insights: Exercise Patience: Expect potential volatility and constrained upward movement in the short term. Significant rallies may require sustained buying volume to absorb the existing supply. Leverage On-Chain Analytics: Tools from firms like Glassnode offer unparalleled visibility into market internals. Monitoring metrics related to holder behavior, cost basis, and supply distribution can provide a clearer picture than price charts alone. Re-evaluate Risk Tolerance: If you are a short-term trader, be particularly mindful of these resistance levels. Long-term investors might view such periods as opportunities for strategic accumulation, but always within your defined risk parameters. Identify Potential Catalysts: While internal market dynamics are at play, external factors could shift the narrative. Keep an eye on major macroeconomic news, regulatory developments, or significant institutional announcements that could provide the necessary impetus for a breakout. This phase is a test of market resilience. It underscores the importance of a well-thought-out investment strategy rather than impulsive reactions. Conclusion: The Path Forward for Bitcoin Amidst Pressure The analysis revealing substantial Bitcoin selling pressure from short-term holders around the $113,600 to $115,600 range provides a critical lens through which to view the current market. This dynamic, while limiting immediate upside, is a natural part of market cycles. It forces a period of consolidation and the absorption of overhead supply. Investors who stay informed, exercise patience, and employ robust risk management strategies will be better positioned to navigate these challenging waters and capitalize on Bitcoin’s long-term potential. Understanding these fundamental forces is paramount for a clearer perspective on Bitcoin’s journey ahead. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 1. What is “short-term holder cost basis”? It refers to the average price at which short-term Bitcoin holders (those who bought BTC 1-3 months ago) initially purchased their assets. If the current price is below this, they are at a loss. 2. Why do short-term holders sell at a loss? Often, short-term holders sell when the price approaches their cost basis to “break even” or minimize further losses, especially if they believe the price might drop further. This creates selling pressure. 3. How does this Bitcoin selling pressure affect BTC’s price? This pressure creates strong resistance levels. As Bitcoin’s price tries to rise, it encounters a significant number of sell orders from these holders, which can cap upward movement and lead to consolidation or minor pullbacks. 4. What can investors do during periods of high Bitcoin selling pressure? Investors can practice patience, monitor on-chain data for insights, reassess their risk tolerance, and look for potential catalysts that could shift market sentiment and overcome the selling pressure. 5. Is this a bearish sign for Bitcoin’s long-term outlook? Not necessarily. While it indicates short-term resistance, such periods of consolidation and supply absorption are a natural part of market cycles. They can help build a stronger foundation for future growth, testing investor resolve. Did this analysis help you understand the current Bitcoin market better? Share this article with your fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness and foster informed discussions! To learn more about the latest Bitcoin trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Bitcoin price action. This post Bitcoin Selling Pressure: Crucial Analysis Reveals Short-Term Holder Impact first appeared on BitcoinWorld and is written by Editorial Team
Share
Coinstats2025/08/28 18:30
Share