Bitcoin endured one of its sharpest selloffs of the year on Tuesday, knifing below the six-figure threshold and printing lows around the $99,000 area on major composites before rebounding. At press time, bitcoin (BTC) hovered near $101,700 after an intraday trough just above $99,000 on widely used benchmarks, marking a fall of roughly 6% day-over-day and the lowest print since June. The slide came as US equities limped into mid-week, with the Nasdaq up 20.9% year-to-date and the S&P 500 up 15.1% as of Tuesday’s close—gains that underscore how much bitcoin has lagged other risk assets during long stretches of 2025. That divergence, together with a growing body of ETF-flow data showing several straight sessions of net outflows from US spot bitcoin funds into early November, provided the macro backdrop for a fragile crypto tape. Independent tallies from Farside/SoSoValue and multiple outlets point to a roughly $1.3–$1.4 billion cumulative bleed over four trading days into November 3–4, led by BlackRock’s IBIT. Why Is Bitcoin Price Down? Into that context, Joe Consorti—Head of Growth at Horizon (Theya, YC)—argues the selloff is less a loss of conviction than a structural handoff of supply. In a video analysis posted late November 4 US time, he framed the day’s move as “one of its roughest days of the year, down more than 6 percent, falling to $99,000 for the first time since June,” adding that while equities would call that “the start of a bear market… for Bitcoin, though, this is typical of a bull market drawdown.” He noted that “we’ve already weathered two separate 30 percent drawdowns during this bull run,” and characterized the present action as “a transfer of Bitcoin’s ownership base from the old guard to the new guard.” Related Reading: CryptoQuant Head Reveals Reason Behind Bearish Bitcoin Trend Consorti anchored his thesis to a now-viral framework from macro investor Jordi Visser: bitcoin’s “silent IPO.” In Visser’s Substack essay—shared widely since the weekend—he posits that 2025’s rangebound price belies an orderly, IPO-like distribution as early-era holders access the deepest liquidity the asset has ever had through ETFs, institutional custodians and corporate balance sheets. “Early-stage investors… need liquidity. They need an exit. They need to diversify,” Visser wrote, arguing that methodical selling “results [in] a sideways grind that drives everyone crazy.” Consorti adopted the frame bluntly: “This isn’t panic selling, it’s the natural evolution of an asset that’s reached maturity… a transfer of ownership from concentrated hands to distributed ones.” Evidence for that churn has been visible on-chain. Multiple instances of Satoshi-era wallets and miner addresses reanimating this quarter—some after 14 years—have been documented, including July’s duo of 10,000-BTC wallets and late-October movement from a 4,000-BTC miner address. While not dispositive that coins are being market-sold, the pattern is consistent with supply redistributing from early concentrates to broader, regulated channels. Technically, Consorti cast the drop as part of “digestion,” not exhaustion. “The RSI tells us Bitcoin is at its most oversold level since April, when the last leg of the bull run began. Every drawdown this cycle, 30%, 35%, and now 20%, has built support rather than destroyed it.” He added a key conditional: “If we spend too much time below $100,000, that could suggest the distribution isn’t done… perhaps we’re in for a bull-market reversal into a bear market.” Macro, however, is intruding. The Federal Reserve cut rates by 25 bps on October 29 to a 3.75%–4.00% target range, but Chair Jerome Powell carefully pushed back on the idea of an automatic December cut, citing “strongly differing views” inside the FOMC and a “data fog” from the ongoing government shutdown. Markets promptly tempered their odds for further near-term easing. Consorti’s warning that bitcoin “is extremely correlated” to risk-asset drawdowns therefore looms large: if equities lurch meaningfully lower or funding stress reappears, crypto will feel it. Related Reading: Bitcoin Bull Run: Over Or Just Paused? CryptoQuant CEO Presents The Data If Visser’s “silent IPO” is right, ETFs are both symptom and salve. They have delivered the two-sided depth to absorb legacy supply but also introduced a new, faster-moving cohort whose redemptions can amplify downdrafts. That dynamic showed up again this week in the four-day string of net outflows concentrated in IBIT, even as longer-term assets under management remain enormous by historical standards. Consorti’s conclusion was starkly patient, not euphoric. “For every seller looking to liquidate their position, there’s a new participant stepping in for the long haul… It’s slow, it’s uneven, and it’s psychologically draining, but once it’s finished, it unlocks the next leg higher. Because the marginal seller is gone, and what’s left is a base of holders who don’t need to sell.” Whether Tuesday’s pierce of the six-figure floor proves the climactic flush—or merely another chapter in a months-long ownership transfer—will hinge on how quickly price reclaims and bases above $100,000, how ETF flows stabilize, and whether the Fed’s path from here restores risk appetite or starves it. For now, the most important story in bitcoin may be happening under the surface, not on the chart. At press time, BTC traded at $101,865. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.comBitcoin endured one of its sharpest selloffs of the year on Tuesday, knifing below the six-figure threshold and printing lows around the $99,000 area on major composites before rebounding. At press time, bitcoin (BTC) hovered near $101,700 after an intraday trough just above $99,000 on widely used benchmarks, marking a fall of roughly 6% day-over-day and the lowest print since June. The slide came as US equities limped into mid-week, with the Nasdaq up 20.9% year-to-date and the S&P 500 up 15.1% as of Tuesday’s close—gains that underscore how much bitcoin has lagged other risk assets during long stretches of 2025. That divergence, together with a growing body of ETF-flow data showing several straight sessions of net outflows from US spot bitcoin funds into early November, provided the macro backdrop for a fragile crypto tape. Independent tallies from Farside/SoSoValue and multiple outlets point to a roughly $1.3–$1.4 billion cumulative bleed over four trading days into November 3–4, led by BlackRock’s IBIT. Why Is Bitcoin Price Down? Into that context, Joe Consorti—Head of Growth at Horizon (Theya, YC)—argues the selloff is less a loss of conviction than a structural handoff of supply. In a video analysis posted late November 4 US time, he framed the day’s move as “one of its roughest days of the year, down more than 6 percent, falling to $99,000 for the first time since June,” adding that while equities would call that “the start of a bear market… for Bitcoin, though, this is typical of a bull market drawdown.” He noted that “we’ve already weathered two separate 30 percent drawdowns during this bull run,” and characterized the present action as “a transfer of Bitcoin’s ownership base from the old guard to the new guard.” Related Reading: CryptoQuant Head Reveals Reason Behind Bearish Bitcoin Trend Consorti anchored his thesis to a now-viral framework from macro investor Jordi Visser: bitcoin’s “silent IPO.” In Visser’s Substack essay—shared widely since the weekend—he posits that 2025’s rangebound price belies an orderly, IPO-like distribution as early-era holders access the deepest liquidity the asset has ever had through ETFs, institutional custodians and corporate balance sheets. “Early-stage investors… need liquidity. They need an exit. They need to diversify,” Visser wrote, arguing that methodical selling “results [in] a sideways grind that drives everyone crazy.” Consorti adopted the frame bluntly: “This isn’t panic selling, it’s the natural evolution of an asset that’s reached maturity… a transfer of ownership from concentrated hands to distributed ones.” Evidence for that churn has been visible on-chain. Multiple instances of Satoshi-era wallets and miner addresses reanimating this quarter—some after 14 years—have been documented, including July’s duo of 10,000-BTC wallets and late-October movement from a 4,000-BTC miner address. While not dispositive that coins are being market-sold, the pattern is consistent with supply redistributing from early concentrates to broader, regulated channels. Technically, Consorti cast the drop as part of “digestion,” not exhaustion. “The RSI tells us Bitcoin is at its most oversold level since April, when the last leg of the bull run began. Every drawdown this cycle, 30%, 35%, and now 20%, has built support rather than destroyed it.” He added a key conditional: “If we spend too much time below $100,000, that could suggest the distribution isn’t done… perhaps we’re in for a bull-market reversal into a bear market.” Macro, however, is intruding. The Federal Reserve cut rates by 25 bps on October 29 to a 3.75%–4.00% target range, but Chair Jerome Powell carefully pushed back on the idea of an automatic December cut, citing “strongly differing views” inside the FOMC and a “data fog” from the ongoing government shutdown. Markets promptly tempered their odds for further near-term easing. Consorti’s warning that bitcoin “is extremely correlated” to risk-asset drawdowns therefore looms large: if equities lurch meaningfully lower or funding stress reappears, crypto will feel it. Related Reading: Bitcoin Bull Run: Over Or Just Paused? CryptoQuant CEO Presents The Data If Visser’s “silent IPO” is right, ETFs are both symptom and salve. They have delivered the two-sided depth to absorb legacy supply but also introduced a new, faster-moving cohort whose redemptions can amplify downdrafts. That dynamic showed up again this week in the four-day string of net outflows concentrated in IBIT, even as longer-term assets under management remain enormous by historical standards. Consorti’s conclusion was starkly patient, not euphoric. “For every seller looking to liquidate their position, there’s a new participant stepping in for the long haul… It’s slow, it’s uneven, and it’s psychologically draining, but once it’s finished, it unlocks the next leg higher. Because the marginal seller is gone, and what’s left is a base of holders who don’t need to sell.” Whether Tuesday’s pierce of the six-figure floor proves the climactic flush—or merely another chapter in a months-long ownership transfer—will hinge on how quickly price reclaims and bases above $100,000, how ETF flows stabilize, and whether the Fed’s path from here restores risk appetite or starves it. For now, the most important story in bitcoin may be happening under the surface, not on the chart. At press time, BTC traded at $101,865. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com

Bitcoin Price Crashes Below $99,000: Expert Breaks Down Why

2025/11/05 16:00

Bitcoin endured one of its sharpest selloffs of the year on Tuesday, knifing below the six-figure threshold and printing lows around the $99,000 area on major composites before rebounding. At press time, bitcoin (BTC) hovered near $101,700 after an intraday trough just above $99,000 on widely used benchmarks, marking a fall of roughly 6% day-over-day and the lowest print since June.

The slide came as US equities limped into mid-week, with the Nasdaq up 20.9% year-to-date and the S&P 500 up 15.1% as of Tuesday’s close—gains that underscore how much bitcoin has lagged other risk assets during long stretches of 2025. That divergence, together with a growing body of ETF-flow data showing several straight sessions of net outflows from US spot bitcoin funds into early November, provided the macro backdrop for a fragile crypto tape. Independent tallies from Farside/SoSoValue and multiple outlets point to a roughly $1.3–$1.4 billion cumulative bleed over four trading days into November 3–4, led by BlackRock’s IBIT.

Why Is Bitcoin Price Down?

Into that context, Joe Consorti—Head of Growth at Horizon (Theya, YC)—argues the selloff is less a loss of conviction than a structural handoff of supply. In a video analysis posted late November 4 US time, he framed the day’s move as “one of its roughest days of the year, down more than 6 percent, falling to $99,000 for the first time since June,” adding that while equities would call that “the start of a bear market… for Bitcoin, though, this is typical of a bull market drawdown.” He noted that “we’ve already weathered two separate 30 percent drawdowns during this bull run,” and characterized the present action as “a transfer of Bitcoin’s ownership base from the old guard to the new guard.”

Consorti anchored his thesis to a now-viral framework from macro investor Jordi Visser: bitcoin’s “silent IPO.” In Visser’s Substack essay—shared widely since the weekend—he posits that 2025’s rangebound price belies an orderly, IPO-like distribution as early-era holders access the deepest liquidity the asset has ever had through ETFs, institutional custodians and corporate balance sheets.

“Early-stage investors… need liquidity. They need an exit. They need to diversify,” Visser wrote, arguing that methodical selling “results [in] a sideways grind that drives everyone crazy.” Consorti adopted the frame bluntly: “This isn’t panic selling, it’s the natural evolution of an asset that’s reached maturity… a transfer of ownership from concentrated hands to distributed ones.”

Evidence for that churn has been visible on-chain. Multiple instances of Satoshi-era wallets and miner addresses reanimating this quarter—some after 14 years—have been documented, including July’s duo of 10,000-BTC wallets and late-October movement from a 4,000-BTC miner address. While not dispositive that coins are being market-sold, the pattern is consistent with supply redistributing from early concentrates to broader, regulated channels.

Technically, Consorti cast the drop as part of “digestion,” not exhaustion. “The RSI tells us Bitcoin is at its most oversold level since April, when the last leg of the bull run began. Every drawdown this cycle, 30%, 35%, and now 20%, has built support rather than destroyed it.” He added a key conditional: “If we spend too much time below $100,000, that could suggest the distribution isn’t done… perhaps we’re in for a bull-market reversal into a bear market.”

Macro, however, is intruding. The Federal Reserve cut rates by 25 bps on October 29 to a 3.75%–4.00% target range, but Chair Jerome Powell carefully pushed back on the idea of an automatic December cut, citing “strongly differing views” inside the FOMC and a “data fog” from the ongoing government shutdown. Markets promptly tempered their odds for further near-term easing. Consorti’s warning that bitcoin “is extremely correlated” to risk-asset drawdowns therefore looms large: if equities lurch meaningfully lower or funding stress reappears, crypto will feel it.

If Visser’s “silent IPO” is right, ETFs are both symptom and salve. They have delivered the two-sided depth to absorb legacy supply but also introduced a new, faster-moving cohort whose redemptions can amplify downdrafts. That dynamic showed up again this week in the four-day string of net outflows concentrated in IBIT, even as longer-term assets under management remain enormous by historical standards.

Consorti’s conclusion was starkly patient, not euphoric. “For every seller looking to liquidate their position, there’s a new participant stepping in for the long haul… It’s slow, it’s uneven, and it’s psychologically draining, but once it’s finished, it unlocks the next leg higher. Because the marginal seller is gone, and what’s left is a base of holders who don’t need to sell.”

Whether Tuesday’s pierce of the six-figure floor proves the climactic flush—or merely another chapter in a months-long ownership transfer—will hinge on how quickly price reclaims and bases above $100,000, how ETF flows stabilize, and whether the Fed’s path from here restores risk appetite or starves it. For now, the most important story in bitcoin may be happening under the surface, not on the chart.

At press time, BTC traded at $101,865.

Bitcoin price
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Essential UK Stablecoin Regulations Align with US Approach – What You Need to Know

Essential UK Stablecoin Regulations Align with US Approach – What You Need to Know

BitcoinWorld Essential UK Stablecoin Regulations Align with US Approach – What You Need to Know Are you wondering how the UK’s new stablecoin regulations will affect your cryptocurrency activities? The Bank of England just announced that their approach to stablecoin regulations will closely mirror the United States’ framework. This crucial development signals a coordinated global effort to bring stability and security to the digital asset space. What Do the New Stablecoin Regulations Mean for You? According to Deputy Governor Sarah Breeden, the Bank of England plans to implement specific holding limits as part of their stablecoin regulations. These limits include temporary caps of £20,000 for individual users and £10 million for corporations. This approach ensures that the UK’s stablecoin regulations maintain consistency with international standards while protecting consumers. The alignment of stablecoin regulations between the UK and US represents a significant step toward global cryptocurrency standardization. Moreover, this coordinated effort helps prevent regulatory arbitrage and creates a more predictable environment for businesses operating in both markets. Why Are Stablecoin Regulations So Important? Stablecoin regulations serve multiple critical purposes in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. First, they provide consumer protection against potential market manipulation and fraud. Second, they establish clear guidelines for businesses operating in this space. Finally, proper stablecoin regulations help maintain financial stability by ensuring these digital assets don’t pose systemic risks. Consumer Protection: Limits prevent excessive exposure to single assets Market Confidence: Clear rules encourage institutional participation Financial Stability: Prevents systemic risks from unregulated growth International Cooperation: Aligned approaches reduce regulatory conflicts How Will These Stablecoin Regulations Impact the Market? The implementation of these stablecoin regulations will likely have immediate effects on how users and businesses interact with digital assets. The £20,000 individual limit means retail investors must diversify their stablecoin holdings across multiple providers or assets. Similarly, the £10 million corporate cap requires larger entities to implement sophisticated treasury management strategies. These stablecoin regulations also create opportunities for innovation in custody solutions and risk management tools. Financial technology companies can develop products that help users comply with the new requirements while maximizing their operational efficiency within the regulatory framework. What Challenges Do Stablecoin Regulations Present? While the alignment of stablecoin regulations between the UK and US provides clarity, it also introduces certain challenges. Market participants must adapt to new compliance requirements and reporting standards. Additionally, the temporary nature of the holding limits means businesses need flexible systems that can accommodate future regulatory changes. However, the benefits of having clear stablecoin regulations outweigh these transitional challenges. The framework provides much-needed certainty for investors and businesses alike, potentially accelerating mainstream adoption of digital assets. Key Takeaways from the New Stablecoin Regulations The Bank of England’s announcement about stablecoin regulations marks a pivotal moment for the cryptocurrency industry. By aligning with US approaches, the UK demonstrates its commitment to fostering a secure and innovative digital asset ecosystem. These stablecoin regulations balance innovation with necessary safeguards, creating a foundation for sustainable growth. As these stablecoin regulations take effect, market participants should prepare for increased compliance requirements while recognizing the long-term benefits of regulatory clarity. The coordinated approach between major financial centers sets a positive precedent for global cryptocurrency regulation. Frequently Asked Questions When will the new stablecoin regulations take effect? The Bank of England hasn’t announced a specific implementation date, but the framework is expected to be introduced in the coming months following further consultation with industry stakeholders. How do the UK stablecoin regulations compare to other countries? The UK’s approach closely mirrors US regulations, creating alignment between two major financial markets. This coordination helps prevent regulatory fragmentation and supports global cryptocurrency adoption. Can individuals hold more than £20,000 in stablecoins? The £20,000 limit applies per individual user per service provider. Users can potentially hold additional stablecoins with different regulated providers, though they should monitor their overall exposure. Will these regulations affect existing stablecoin holdings? Existing holdings will likely need to comply with the new limits once the regulations take effect. Users should prepare to adjust their portfolios accordingly during any transition period. Do these regulations apply to all types of stablecoins? The framework primarily targets fiat-backed stablecoins, which maintain reserves in traditional currencies. Other types of stablecoins may face different regulatory treatment based on their underlying structures. How will enforcement of these regulations work? The Bank of England and Financial Conduct Authority will jointly oversee compliance, with authorized firms required to implement systems that ensure adherence to the holding limits and other requirements. Found this analysis of stablecoin regulations helpful? Share this article with your network on social media to help others understand these important regulatory developments. Your shares help spread valuable information throughout the cryptocurrency community. To learn more about the latest cryptocurrency trends, explore our article on key developments shaping digital assets institutional adoption. This post Essential UK Stablecoin Regulations Align with US Approach – What You Need to Know first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/11/06 03:55
Massive Richard Heart ETH Transfer Sparks Controversy

Massive Richard Heart ETH Transfer Sparks Controversy

BitcoinWorld Massive Richard Heart ETH Transfer Sparks Controversy A significant event has captured the attention of the crypto community: a massive Richard Heart ETH transfer. An address widely linked to Richard Heart, the prominent founder of the crypto project HEX, recently moved a staggering 27,449 ETH. This substantial sum was first shifted to a new address and is now being transferred into Tornado Cash, according to reports from Onchain Lens. This development immediately sparked widespread discussion and speculation across the digital asset landscape. What’s Behind the Massive Richard Heart ETH Transfer? The recent movement of such a large amount of Ethereum by an address associated with Richard Heart is undeniably a headline-grabbing event. For context, 27,449 ETH represents a considerable value in the current market, making any such transaction noteworthy. The initial transfer to a new address often precedes further actions, and in this case, the destination is particularly intriguing: Tornado Cash. This substantial Richard Heart ETH transfer raises immediate questions about its purpose. Was it for enhanced privacy, or are there other strategic reasons at play? The crypto world is buzzing with theories as market participants try to decipher the motivations behind this significant move. Understanding Tornado Cash: A Tool for Privacy or Controversy? To fully grasp the implications of this event, it is crucial to understand Tornado Cash. Simply put, Tornado Cash is a decentralized protocol designed to enhance transaction privacy on the Ethereum blockchain. It achieves this by mixing various cryptocurrency deposits from different users, making it extremely difficult to trace the origin and destination of funds. Think of it as a digital blender for crypto assets. However, Tornado Cash has also been at the center of considerable controversy. While it serves legitimate purposes for individuals seeking financial privacy, it has unfortunately been exploited by bad actors for money laundering and obfuscating illicit funds. This dual nature means any large deposit, especially a Richard Heart ETH transfer, inevitably attracts scrutiny. Why Does This Richard Heart ETH Transfer Matter for HEX and Beyond? Richard Heart is not just any crypto figure; he is the outspoken founder of HEX, a project that has cultivated a dedicated, albeit sometimes controversial, following. His actions are often viewed through the lens of their potential impact on HEX and his other ventures, like PulseChain. Therefore, a significant move like this Richard Heart ETH transfer naturally leads to speculation within his community and the broader crypto market. The implications extend beyond just HEX. This event reignites the ongoing debate about privacy tools in the decentralized finance (DeFi) space. It highlights the tension between individual financial privacy and regulatory demands for transparency. Here are some key points: Privacy Concerns: For some, using Tornado Cash is a fundamental right to financial privacy, protecting transactions from unwanted surveillance. Regulatory Scrutiny: Regulators globally are increasingly concerned about services that can obscure fund flows, often citing national security and anti-money laundering (AML) concerns. Community Perception: Such transfers can influence public perception of a project founder and, by extension, the projects they lead. The Broader Impact: Transparency vs. Anonymity in Crypto The crypto world is built on principles of decentralization and, for many, anonymity. However, as the industry matures, the calls for greater transparency from traditional financial institutions and governments grow louder. The Richard Heart ETH transfer into Tornado Cash serves as a stark reminder of this fundamental clash. This incident will likely fuel further discussions on how to balance these competing ideals. It also prompts questions about the future of privacy-enhancing technologies and how they will be integrated into a more regulated crypto ecosystem. Developers and users alike continue to navigate this complex landscape, seeking solutions that uphold core crypto values while addressing legitimate concerns. What Comes Next for the Richard Heart ETH Transfer? While the funds have entered Tornado Cash, the ultimate destination and purpose of this Richard Heart ETH transfer remain unknown. Onchain analysis can track funds into Tornado Cash, but tracing them out to a specific individual becomes incredibly challenging. This is precisely the design of the protocol. The crypto community will undoubtedly continue to monitor any further on-chain movements that might shed more light on this situation. For now, the event serves as a powerful illustration of the ongoing dynamics between high-profile crypto figures, significant wealth, and the ever-present tools for transaction privacy. A Compelling Summary of the Unfolding Event In conclusion, the substantial Richard Heart ETH transfer of 27,449 ETH to Tornado Cash is a development that underscores several critical aspects of the cryptocurrency world. It highlights the power of on-chain analytics to uncover significant transactions, the role of privacy-enhancing protocols like Tornado Cash, and the ongoing dialogue surrounding transparency and anonymity in digital assets. While the motivations behind this particular transfer remain speculative, its occurrence reinforces the complex and evolving nature of the crypto ecosystem. The community watches closely, pondering the long-term implications for HEX, Richard Heart, and the broader push for financial privacy. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q: Who is Richard Heart?A: Richard Heart is the founder of the cryptocurrency project HEX and PulseChain. He is a prominent and often controversial figure in the crypto space. Q: What is Tornado Cash?A: Tornado Cash is a decentralized protocol on Ethereum that enhances transaction privacy by mixing crypto funds from multiple users, making it difficult to trace individual transactions. Q: How much ETH was transferred by the address linked to Richard Heart?A: An address suspected of belonging to Richard Heart moved 27,449 ETH to a new address, which is now being transferred to Tornado Cash. Q: Why is this Richard Heart ETH transfer significant?A: It’s significant due to the large amount of ETH involved, Richard Heart’s high profile, and the use of Tornado Cash, which sparks debates about privacy, transparency, and regulatory scrutiny in crypto. Q: Does this mean the funds are untraceable?A: While funds entering Tornado Cash are difficult to trace to their ultimate recipient, on-chain analytics can confirm their entry into the mixing service. Did this deep dive into the Richard Heart ETH transfer spark your interest? Share this article with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to keep the conversation going! Your insights contribute to a more informed crypto community. To learn more about the latest explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum price action. This post Massive Richard Heart ETH Transfer Sparks Controversy first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/11/06 04:00