THE Supreme Court (SC) has dismissed a petition challenging the legality of Manila City Ordinance No. 9151, which implements a revised schedule for city-wide garbageTHE Supreme Court (SC) has dismissed a petition challenging the legality of Manila City Ordinance No. 9151, which implements a revised schedule for city-wide garbage

SC junks petition vs Manila’s garbage collection fee

2026/03/16 21:42
1 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

THE Supreme Court (SC) has dismissed a petition challenging the legality of Manila City Ordinance No. 9151, which implements a revised schedule for city-wide garbage collection fees.

The Court ruled that John Barry T. Tayam, a resident of Las Piñas, failed to establish legal standing as he is not among the persons covered by the ordinance who would suffer direct injury.

“Undoubtedly, the Court is not a trier of facts,” the en banc said in its 5-page resolution. “Hence, the Court must dismiss petitions directly filed before it when they involve factual issues that must be resolved first for the case’s proper disposition.”

The tribunal added that the petitioner violated the doctrine of hierarchy of courts by failing to seek relief from the appropriate regional trial court before escalating the matter to the high court.

The dismissal effectively denies the prayer for a temporary restraining order, upholding the city’s right to regulate waste management fees for Manila-based businesses and residential units. — Chloe Mari A. Hufana

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.