PIPPIN token has suffered a sharp 23.5% decline in the past 24 hours, erasing over $202 million in market capitalization just one day after reaching its all-timePIPPIN token has suffered a sharp 23.5% decline in the past 24 hours, erasing over $202 million in market capitalization just one day after reaching its all-time

PIPPIN Token Crashes 23.5% After ATH: Volume Surge Signals Broader Trend

PIPPIN token has experienced a dramatic reversal, declining 23.5% to $0.66 in the past 24 hours after establishing an all-time high of $0.897 just yesterday. What makes this decline particularly noteworthy isn’t just the magnitude—it’s the timing and the accompanying volume patterns that suggest something more complex than routine profit-taking.

Our analysis of the available market data reveals that PIPPIN shed over $202 million in market capitalization within a single trading day, dropping from approximately $867 million to $665 million. The token’s intraday price range of $0.537 to $0.867 represents a 61% volatility span, suggesting significant disagreement among market participants about fair valuation at current levels.

Volume Anomaly Points to Institutional Exit or Panic Selling

The most striking data point in this decline is the 24-hour trading volume of $83.4 million against a current market cap of $665 million—yielding a volume-to-market-cap ratio of 12.5%. For context, healthy liquid assets typically maintain ratios between 5-15%, but PIPPIN’s ratio sits at the upper end during a sharp decline, not an advance. This pattern typically indicates forced selling or institutional exit rather than organic market correction.

We observe that PIPPIN’s circulating supply of 999.9 million tokens represents virtually its entire max supply of 1 billion tokens, meaning there’s no meaningful token unlock or vesting schedule overhang. This eliminates one common source of selling pressure, making the current decline more attributable to secondary market dynamics rather than tokenomics-driven supply expansion.

The token’s 1-hour price change of +21.4% at the time of data capture suggests we’re witnessing high-frequency volatility cycles—a hallmark of low-liquidity assets experiencing concentrated trading activity. These whipsaw movements often precede either a stabilization period or continued deterioration depending on whether buyer support materializes.

The ATH Psychology: Why 24-Hour Peaks Often Trigger Reversals

PIPPIN’s all-time high occurred on February 26, 2026, at 15:35 UTC—less than 24 hours before the current decline began. This temporal proximity isn’t coincidental. Our historical analysis of similar patterns across crypto assets shows that ATH events often trigger aggressive profit-taking within 24-48 hours, particularly for assets that have experienced rapid appreciation.

Looking at PIPPIN’s 30-day performance of +36.9%, we see a token that had already delivered substantial returns before yesterday’s peak. The 7-day gain of +33% further confirms this was a parabolic move. When assets reach ATH after such compressed timeframe gains, early buyers face a classic game theory dilemma: take profits now at unprecedented levels, or risk a reversal that could erase weeks of gains.

The current price of $0.66 now sits 26.2% below the ATH, which interestingly aligns almost perfectly with the Fibonacci retracement levels many technical traders watch. Whether this represents a healthy pullback or the beginning of a deeper correction depends largely on support behavior at current levels.

Market Cap Dynamics: The $665M Question

At rank #88 by market capitalization, PIPPIN occupies an interesting position in the crypto hierarchy—large enough to attract institutional attention, but small enough to experience significant price impact from concentrated flows. The token’s fully diluted valuation matching its market cap (both at $665 million) confirms minimal token overhang, which should theoretically provide valuation stability.

However, the 23.3% market cap decline in 24 hours reveals vulnerability in the holder base. When market cap erodes faster than price (which is mathematically impossible given the formula), it indicates either data reporting lag or—more concerning—that the selling pressure exceeded natural absorption capacity at each price level during the decline.

We note with particular interest that PIPPIN’s all-time low of $0.0055 occurred on December 30, 2024, just over 14 months ago. The current price represents a 12,016% gain from that bottom, placing PIPPIN among the higher-performing tokens of the 2024-2026 cycle. This context matters: tokens that have delivered 120x returns face structurally different selling pressure than those still establishing price discovery.

Contrarian Indicators: What the Data Doesn’t Tell Us

While our analysis focuses on quantifiable metrics, we must acknowledge significant blind spots in the available data. We have no visibility into on-chain holder distribution, exchange flows, whale wallet activity, or derivatives positioning—all of which could provide clearer causation for this decline.

The absence of a clear fundamental catalyst for the decline is itself noteworthy. No protocol exploit, regulatory announcement, or project-specific news appears correlated with the price action. This suggests the decline is primarily technical or liquidity-driven rather than fundamentally motivated.

Additionally, the 1-hour bounce of +21.4% could indicate either short-term bargain hunting or a dead-cat bounce. Without order book depth data or bid-ask spread analysis, we cannot confidently distinguish between these scenarios. The velocity of the recovery attempt matters as much as its magnitude.

Risk Considerations and Actionable Takeaways

For market participants evaluating PIPPIN at current levels, several data-driven considerations emerge:

Volatility risk remains elevated: The 61% intraday price range suggests position sizing should account for potential -30% to -50% drawdowns in adverse scenarios. The lack of established support levels between $0.66 and $0.55 creates air pockets where price could gap down.

Volume sustainability is questionable: While today’s $83M volume appears healthy in isolation, we need to see whether this level persists or contracts. Declining volume during price recovery attempts typically signals weak conviction among buyers.

The 30-day trend remains positive: Despite today’s decline, PIPPIN still shows +36.9% gains over the past month. This suggests the medium-term trend hasn’t broken unless price falls below approximately $0.48 (representing a 30% decline from current levels).

Fully circulating supply is a double-edged sword: No future token unlocks means no scheduled dilution, but it also means all 1 billion tokens are already in circulation and available to sell. New buying pressure must absorb existing supply rather than just compete with new issuance.

Our analysis suggests this decline, while sharp, doesn’t yet exhibit the characteristics of a fundamental breakdown. The patterns more closely resemble post-ATH profit-taking amplified by thin liquidity conditions. Whether current levels represent value depends entirely on individual risk tolerance and investment timeframe—questions that data alone cannot answer.

Going forward, we’ll be monitoring volume trends, support stability at $0.66, and whether the 7-day trend (+33%) can withstand this setback. The next 48-72 hours will likely determine whether PIPPIN enters a consolidation phase or continues its descent toward the $0.50-$0.55 range where more substantial support may emerge.

Market Opportunity
Pippin Logo
Pippin Price(PIPPIN)
$0.666018
$0.666018$0.666018
+19.10%
USD
Pippin (PIPPIN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRP Volume Rises 212%, Bitcoin ETFs Back in Demand With $506 Million, Dogecoin Price Reclaims $0.10 — U.Today Crypto Digest

XRP Volume Rises 212%, Bitcoin ETFs Back in Demand With $506 Million, Dogecoin Price Reclaims $0.10 — U.Today Crypto Digest

Crypto news digest: 212% increase was seen in XRP volume; BTC ETFs have recovered from the low capital; DOGE price jumps 8%.
Share
Coinstats2026/02/28 05:27
Trump's confidante Steve Bannon says Scott Bessent should run both the Fed and Treasury

Trump's confidante Steve Bannon says Scott Bessent should run both the Fed and Treasury

Steve Bannon wants Scott Bessent to run the two most powerful economic arms of the U.S. government at once — the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department. In a podcast interview on Friday, Steve told Sean Spicer that Scott should take over from Jerome Powell as Fed chair next year but still stay on as Treasury Secretary. The episode’s footage was obtained by CNBC’s Eamon Javers. “I am a big believer that on an interim basis, that Scott Bessent should be both the head of the Federal Reserve and the secretary of Treasury, and maybe get through the midterm elections, step down at Treasury and take over the Federal Reserve,” Steve said. Scott is already heading the search for Powell’s replacement when his term ends in May 2026. He was once thought to be a candidate himself, but publicly said he’s fine staying at Treasury. That hasn’t stopped Steve from pushing the idea anyway. Steve lasted only seven months as Trump’s White House strategist before getting fired. Still, he’s close to Trump and clearly feels comfortable tossing out these kinds of proposals. The White House, on the other hand, isn’t amused. “Such an arrangement is not being and has never been considered by the White House,” a spokesman said. The idea was immediately shut down. White House rejects plan as Scott leads search for Powell’s replacement There’s no real example of this happening before. Before the Banking Act of 1935, the Treasury Secretary did sit on the Fed’s board, but the chair role wasn’t created until later. Janet Yellen ran the Fed and then the Treasury, but those jobs were years apart. Scott doing both at once — even if temporary — would break that mold completely. Right now, Scott is running the process to find Powell’s successor. Reports say there are 11 names on the list. He was once on it too, until he said he wasn’t interested. Still, Steve thinks Scott should hold both posts until midterms, then leave Treasury and stay on as Fed boss. It’s not clear if anyone else in Trump’s circle supports that plan. Trump has repeatedly slammed the Fed for not slashing interest rates more. He wants a Fed that moves fast — his way. That pressure could be why Steve wants someone loyal like Scott at the top. But making him do both jobs, even for a few months, would raise serious legal, policy, and political questions. Fed’s Miran dismisses tariff inflation and calls for deeper rate cuts While Steve is pushing personnel moves, Fed Governor Stephen Miran is focused on policy. He voted against the Fed’s decision this week to cut rates by 0.25%. He wanted a 0.5% cut instead. Speaking on CNBC’s “Money Movers” Friday, Miran said he doesn’t think Trump’s tariffs will cause inflation. “I’m clearly in the minority in not being concerned about inflation from tariffs,” Miran said. “But that was also true in 2018-2019, and I think I probably could take a little victory lap about that.” He said he hasn’t seen any real evidence that tariffs are pushing up prices. “If you thought tariffs are driving inflation higher, you’d think imports would be differentially inflating at a higher pace,” he said. Miran also said the difference between inflation in U.S. core goods and other countries is tiny. “If I thought that tariffs were driving any material inflation in the United States, I’d look for evidence,” he added. Even so, the Fed’s own data says inflation is still above 2%, and might not fall back to target until 2028. Only Miran wanted the Fed to move faster on cutting rates. The rest of the 12-member committee didn’t agree, as Cryptopolitan reported. Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/20 09:48
Shiba Inu’s (SHIB) Price Prediction for 2025 Points to 4x Growth, But Mutuum Finance (MUTM) Looks Set for 50x Returns

Shiba Inu’s (SHIB) Price Prediction for 2025 Points to 4x Growth, But Mutuum Finance (MUTM) Looks Set for 50x Returns

As Shiba Inu (SHIB) takes over the limelight with experts predicting a potential 4x increase by 2025, a far more disruptive competitor, Mutuum Finance (MUTM), is emerging in the cryptocurrency market. Unlike SHIB, which is depending upon community-driven momentum and speculative buying, Mutuum Finance is building a decentralized protocol for lending and borrowing that will […]
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/09/18 02:30