The post Ethereum Price Risks a Drop to $1,500 — Here’s Why appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Ethereum price is showing early signs of stabilization afterThe post Ethereum Price Risks a Drop to $1,500 — Here’s Why appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Ethereum price is showing early signs of stabilization after

Ethereum Price Risks a Drop to $1,500 — Here’s Why

5 min read

The Ethereum price is showing early signs of stabilization after a sharp sell-off in late January. ETH has rebounded about 4.6% over the past 24 hours after dipping near $2,160. On the surface, this looks like a relief bounce inside a broader falling wedge pattern.

But on-chain data tells a more cautious story. While the bullish structure has not fully broken, long-term holder behavior and profit-loss metrics are weakening. Together, they suggest that this rebound may lack strong conviction. If these trends persist, Ethereum could remain vulnerable to another leg lower, with even $1,500 in sight.

A 37% Price Drop Couldn’t Break Pattern, But There’s A Catch

Since mid-January, Ethereum has fallen nearly 37% to lows around $2,160. The decline followed a clear bearish divergence.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Between January 6 and January 14, ETH made a higher high, while the Relative Strength Index (RSI) made a lower high. RSI measures momentum on a 0–100 scale. When price rises, but RSI weakens, it signals fading buying pressure. This divergence often leads to trend reversals, and Ethereum responded accordingly.

Despite the sharp drop, the price has stayed inside a falling wedge. A falling wedge forms when the price makes lower highs and lower lows inside narrowing trendlines. It is usually a bullish structure that signals weakening selling pressure.

Ethereum Holds Structure: TradingView

Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.

So structurally, Ethereum has not fully broken down. However, something more important has weakened: long-term holder conviction.

Hodler Net Position Change tracks whether long-term investors are accumulating or selling. On January 18, the 30-day net position change peaked near +338,708 ETH. This showed strong accumulation.

By February 2, that figure had collapsed to around +40,953 ETH. That is a drop of nearly 90%.

Hodlers Accumulating Fewer Coins: Glassnode

This means long-term holders have sharply reduced buying during the correction. When conviction holders do not accumulate into weakness, it usually signals that the market has not reached a true bottom. Strong bottoms form when long-term holders keep accumulating even as prices fall. That is not happening now.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Paper Profits And Exchange Transfers Show Rallies Are Being Sold

The second warning comes from Ethereum’s Net Unrealized Profit/Loss (NUPL) and exchange transfer data.

NUPL measures how much profit or loss holders have on paper. It compares current prices with the average purchase price. When NUPL is high, most investors are in profit. When it turns negative, many are at a loss.

In late January, Ethereum’s NUPL dropped from around 0.25 to near 0.007 by February 1. This shows that profits have almost vanished, but not completely.

NUPL Reset Needed: Glassnode

However, on a one-year view, NUPL is still far from true capitulation.

In April 2025, NUPL fell to −0.22. That marked deep fear and capitulation. After that, ETH rallied from about $1,472 to $4,829, a surge of roughly 228%. Today, NUPL is nowhere near those levels.

Sponsored

Sponsored

This suggests that large-scale capitulation has not happened yet. There may still be room for further downside before a durable bottom forms.

Exchange transfer data adds to this risk. During the late-January drop, numbers of transfers (not coins) fell to around 23,000–24,000 per day. This showed reduced selling pressure near the lows. But during the rebound between February 1 and February 2, transfers jumped to above 37,000.

That is a rise of more than 50% in one day. This means many holders (possibly the speculative ones) used the bounce to move ETH to exchanges and likely sell. When every rebound triggers a spike in transfers, it signals that rallies are being distributed, not accumulated.

Exchange Transfers Surge: Glassnode

This pattern highlights a growing divide between speculative traders and longer-term capital.

Gil Rosen, Co-Founder of the Blockchain Builders Fund, described this split in an exclusive quote to BeInCrypto:

Sponsored

Sponsored

This behavior keeps upward moves weak.

Ethereum Price Levels Show Why $1,500 Is Back in Play

With structure holding but conviction weakening, the Ethereum price levels now matter more than indicators. The first key support sits near $2,250. This level has acted as a short-term base after the rebound.

Below that, $2,160 remains critical. This marks the recent low and is closer to the lower boundary of the falling wedge. A confirmed break below this zone would weaken the bullish Ethereum price structure.

If $2,160 fails and also the lower wedge trendline , risk opens toward the $1,540 region, a key Fib extension level to the downside. This kind of dip would also bring NUPL closer to historical capitulation levels and the price near the April 2025 zone.

Ethereum Price Analysis: TradingView

That is where a deeper reset could occur. On the upside, Ethereum must reclaim $2,690 to change the narrative. This level marks a major Fibonacci resistance and a prior breakdown zone.

Only a sustained move above $2,690 would signal that buyers are regaining control. Until then, rallies between $2,250 and $2,690 are likely to face heavy selling pressure. As long as ETH remains trapped in this range, every bounce risks becoming another exit opportunity.

Source: https://beincrypto.com/ethereum-price-1500-drop-analysis/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

A longtime adversary of President Donald Trump has a plan for a key group to take away what Trump craves the most — attention. EX-CNN journalist Jim Acosta, who
Share
Rawstory2026/02/04 01:19
Why Bitcoin Is Struggling: 8 Factors Impacting Crypto Markets

Why Bitcoin Is Struggling: 8 Factors Impacting Crypto Markets

Failed blockchain adoption narratives and weak fee capture have undercut confidence in major crypto projects.
Share
CryptoPotato2026/02/04 01:05