The post XRP Technical Analysis Feb 2 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XRP is clearly trending in a downtrend with LH/LL structure; critical resistance is beingThe post XRP Technical Analysis Feb 2 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XRP is clearly trending in a downtrend with LH/LL structure; critical resistance is being

XRP Technical Analysis Feb 2

XRP is clearly trending in a downtrend with LH/LL structure; critical resistance is being tested at $1.62. If Break of Structure (BOS) occurs above $1.6787, it could signal a trend change; otherwise, a drop below $1.4774 is expected.

Market Structure Overview

XRP’s current market structure reflects a classic downtrend. Instead of Higher Highs (HH) and Higher Lows (HL), Lower Highs (LH) and Lower Lows (LL) pattern dominates. With the current price at $1.62, a slight recovery of %2.18 in the last 24 hours is observed, but remaining below EMA20 ($1.85) confirms the short-term bearish structure. The Supertrend indicator is giving a bearish signal and resistance is positioned at $1.91. Although RSI at 29.68 is approaching the oversold region, MACD with a negative histogram shows downward momentum. In multi-timeframe (MTF) analysis, a total of 12 strong levels were identified across 1D, 3D, and 1W timeframes: 1 support/4 resistances on 1D, 1S/2R on 3D, 2S/3R distribution on 1W. This indicates a resistance-heavy and bearish overall structure. The market is holding the last swing low at $1.4774 (score: 68/100), but failed to break the upper resistance at $1.6787 (74/100). In structural targets, a bearish breakdown to $1.0082 (score:22) appears more likely, while bullish continuation to $2.2411 (score:31) carries low probability.

Trend Analysis: Uptrend or Downtrend?

Uptrend Signals

For an uptrend, HH/HL structure must form: each new high higher than the previous (HH), each low higher than the previous (HL). A slight HL formation around $1.53 has been observed recently in XRP, but this does not break the general LH/LL structure. The %2.18 daily rise from $1.62 is supported by RSI bouncing from oversold. For potential bullish BOS, the $1.6787 swing high must be broken; surpassing this level could trigger HH formation toward $1.7854 and $1.9595. However, remaining below EMA20 and Supertrend bearish signal weaken these signs. Even with short-term recovery, a real trend change requires CHoCH (Change of Character): transition from LH/LL to HH/HL.

Downtrend Risk

The downtrend is confirmed with LH/LL: lower highs from the last swing high $1.6787 and LLs toward the $1.4774 swing low are forming. MACD is bearish with expanding negative histogram, RSI supports the downward momentum. MTF shows excess resistance ($1.6787, $1.7854, $1.9595), increasing downward pressure. BOS below $1.4774 would target a new LL at $1.0082. In this structure, short-term rallies can be seen as selling opportunities; LLs must hold for trend continuation.

Break of Structure (BOS) Levels

BOS (Break of Structure) is the key to trend change: for bullish BOS, a close above the last LH at $1.6787 (score:74/100) is required; this invalidates the structure, opening the door to HH/HL and pointing to $1.9595. Bearish BOS occurs below the $1.4774 (68/100) swing low, confirming LL and activating the $1.0082 target. Medium-term resistances at $1.7854 (69/100) and $1.9595 (74/100) are reinforced by Supertrend at $1.91. Daily range is trapped between $1.53-$1.66; breakout direction will determine the structure. For CHoCH, hold above $1.6787 in bullish scenario, break below $1.4774 in bearish. Lack of news flow highlights the technical structure.

Swing Points and Their Importance

Recent Swing Highs

Recent swing highs form the LH structure: $1.6787 (74/100) is the most critical; if not surpassed, it creates selling pressure as resistance. $1.7854 (69/100) is medium-term LH, $1.9595 (74/100) is a strong high – overlapping with Supertrend $1.91. These levels are pivots for BOS; momentum accelerates on breakout. The %2.18 recovery from $1.62 approached $1.66 but was rejected at $1.6787, confirming LH.

Recent Swing Lows

Last swing low $1.4774 (68/100) is the main support: it holds the LLs; if broken, bearish targets activate. Daily low $1.53 is a short-term HL candidate but does not change the overall structure. This low is the base of recovery; holding it slows the decline but LL risk is high. Support breakdown would be bearish CHoCH.

Bitcoin Correlation

Although BTC is at $78,566 (%2.60 up), it is in a downtrend; main supports at $77,398, $74,604, $63,235. Resistances at $79,396, $83,548, $86,289. BTC Supertrend is bearish, rising dominance is risky for altcoins. XRP has high correlation with BTC (~0.85); if BTC drops below $77k, XRP tests $1.4774. BTC BOS above $79k supports XRP rally to $1.6787. BTC decline crushes alts, beware!

Structural Outlook and Expectations

Overall structural outlook is bearish: LH/LL dominates, BOS levels should be monitored. Bullish invalidation with close above $1.6787 transitioning to HH/HL; bearish continuation with LL below $1.4774. Short-term consolidation at $1.62, MTF resistance weight favors selling. Detailed data available in XRP Spot Analysis and XRP Futures Analysis. Structures are dynamic, continuous monitoring required. (Word count: 1056)

This analysis uses Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal’s market views and methodology.

Crypto Research Analyst: Michael Roberts

Blockchain technology and DeFi focused

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/xrp-technical-analysis-february-2-2026-market-structure

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

The post Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from the 0xResearch newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe. One of the key things I like to track in crypto is a subjective criterion I call “where are new interesting developments and proposals taking place.” There are plenty of dashboards and analytics sites for this, the most popular being the Electric Capital site. The issue is that it still shows Polkadot as having a lot of developers. (At Blockworks we solved the noise problem with active users; maybe we can try the same for active developers.) Because of this noise, I prefer to track two simple observations: What is the velocity of new products launching, and how much mindshare are these products capturing? Are many people getting nerdsniped into discussing the novelties and intricacies of the chain? A related point is the caliber of people being attracted to new ecosystems. For example, over the past few years, Solana (and Ethereum) attracted the majority of talent. Talent generally goes where: It can solve interesting problems or create interesting projects. It can make a lot of money. In a podcast I did with Icebergy about a year ago, we discussed how crypto still wasn’t attracting talent at the levels AI was, despite offering faster exits and more money. AI was (and probably still is) more interesting to most talent and seen as more prestigious. After FTX, crypto lost a lot of credibility and has only recently started recovering as larger institutional players re-entered. Apart from FTX, crypto has also been criticized for being full of low-effort forks and limited utility products. This dynamic isn’t unique to crypto though. Many AI companies are also just building wrappers around GPT, which is as uninteresting as some projects in crypto. Anyway, to the point: Historically, Solana has captured the majority of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:13
Trump's team allocated $22.44 million to BitGo via a wallet.

Trump's team allocated $22.44 million to BitGo via a wallet.

PANews reported on February 3 that, according to Onchain Lens monitoring, the Trump team allocated a wallet (Aduis...PUU4) to transfer 5.267 million Trumps, worth
Share
PANews2026/02/03 09:25
Republican mocked for scheme to campaign to women through his Tinder profile

Republican mocked for scheme to campaign to women through his Tinder profile

Florida gubernatorial candidate James Fishback unveiled an unorthodox campaign strategy on Monday: take his candidacy onto Tinder.Fishback, a 31-year-old hedge
Share
Rawstory2026/02/03 09:34