Bitcoin Is Being Bought, Not Used For most of Bitcoin’s history, price and usage told broadly the same story. When price moved higher, more people showed up. MoreBitcoin Is Being Bought, Not Used For most of Bitcoin’s history, price and usage told broadly the same story. When price moved higher, more people showed up. More

Bitcoin’s $100k breakout silently crippled its adoption curve as on-chain metrics crater

2026/01/28 00:10
8 min read

Bitcoin Is Being Bought, Not Used

For most of Bitcoin’s history, price and usage told broadly the same story.

When price moved higher, more people showed up. More wallets became active. More transactions hit the chain. The relationship was never perfect, but it was stable enough to treat price as a rough signal for adoption.

That relationship has now broken.

For years, we compared Bitcoin adoption to the growth of the internet, screaming, “We're still early.” The graph went up and to the right. Since 2021, that is no longer the case for Bitcoin.

Bitcoin adoption versus the internetBitcoin adoption versus the internet using active addresses as a proxy for users
Years of GrowthInternet Year (Total Users)Bitcoin Year (Active Addresses SMA)Observation
Year 11991: 4.3M2010: ~105BTC started from a much smaller base.
Year 51995: 39.2M2014: ~150kBTC scaling rapidly.
Year 102000: 361M2019: ~750kBTC on-chain growth begins to slow.
Year 122002: 669M2021: ~1.0MThe Peak: BTC adoption stalls here.
Year 172007: 1.3B2026: ~900kThe Stagnation: BTC activity is down ~10% from 2021.

Bitcoin is trading at levels that would have sounded implausible just a few years ago, yet fewer people are actually using the network. On-chain activity has not completely vanished, but it has clearly failed to keep pace with price.

The data points to a market that is being accumulated aggressively, while the blockchain itself is seeing less engagement than it did four years ago.

This looks less like a temporary divergence and more like a structural shift.

Price hit new highs, usage didn’t

Our first chart makes the problem obvious. The number of active Bitcoin addresses has fallen to the lowest average level since January 2020.

For context, miners received 12.5 BTC per block to verify these transactions when usage was last this low. That's $1.1 million per block by today's prices. Miners today receive an average of just $275,000.

Bitcoin daily active addresses compared with BTC spot price from 2020 to 2026, showing on-chain activity peaking in 2021 while price reaches new all-time highs in the ETF era as usage declines.Bitcoin’s price has reached new all-time highs in the ETF era, even as daily active addresses remain well below their 2021 peak, highlighting a growing gap between valuation and on-chain usage.

Daily active addresses, sourced from CryptoQuant, peaked during the 2021 bull market, reaching roughly 1.2 to 1.3 million addresses per day. That period marked the high watermark for on-chain participation.

Since then, activity has never returned to those levels.

Bitcoin went on to set new all-time highs in the ETF era, yet active addresses failed to make a higher high. By early 2025, as price pushed to record levels, on-chain activity was already rolling over, sitting closer to ranges last seen during the 2022 bear market.

The implication is uncomfortable but hard to ignore. Bitcoin’s highest prices now occur with fewer active users than four years ago.

That alone challenges the assumption that rising prices automatically reflect growing adoption. Capital is clearly flowing into Bitcoin, but far fewer participants are interacting with the network itself.

Moreover, the trend from November 2024 to today may be even more concerning, as shown below.

The total number of unique active addresses, inclusive of senders and receivers.The total number of unique Bitcoin active addresses, inclusive of senders and receivers since the end of 2024 (Source: CryptoQuant)

ETFs changed Bitcoin’s market structure

To understand why this divergence matters, it helps to step back and look at adoption more holistically.

Rather than relying on a single metric, we constructed a composite adoption index using only on-chain fundamentals. The index combines daily active addresses, total transaction count, and the ratio between realized price and spot price, with all inputs normalized and weighted toward usage rather than valuation.

The goal was straightforward, isolate real engagement with the Bitcoin network while filtering out price-driven noise.

When this adoption index is plotted against normalized spot price, a clear divergence emerges in early 2024, shortly after the approval of US spot Bitcoin ETFs by the SEC.

Bitcoin adoption index compared with normalized spot price since 2020, showing price rising faster than adoption beginning in early 2024 after the launch of spot Bitcoin ETFs.A composite adoption index built from on-chain metrics diverges from price after ETFs launch, suggesting recent price gains are no longer accompanied by rising network usage.

Price continues to climb. Adoption stalls and then begins to trend lower.

This pattern did not appear in prior cycles. In 2020 and 2021, price and adoption rose together. In 2022, both fell together. In the ETF era, price has moved ahead while on-chain usage failed to follow.

Since ETFs launched, price has risen faster than adoption, marking a break from how Bitcoin has historically behaved.

That break matters because ETFs change who is buying Bitcoin and how they hold it. Exposure can now be gained without touching the blockchain at all through custodians like Coinbase. No wallets are created. No transactions are broadcast. No fees are paid to miners.

[Editor's Note: OTC transfers by Authorized Participants are regularly registered on-chain, but ETF trades are all off-chain, and many OTC trades also take place off-chain between Coinbase Prime account holders.]

The asset can change hands while the network remains largely untouched.

Capital is deepening, activity is not

The relationship between spot price and realized price makes this shift even clearer.

Realized price reflects the average cost basis of all coins in circulation. It moves slowly and tends to rise as long-term holders accumulate at higher prices. Spot price reacts far more quickly to marginal demand.

Since 2023, realized price has climbed steadily, showing that capital entering Bitcoin is increasingly committed and long-term in nature. Over the same period, spot price has repeatedly overshot, particularly during the ETF-driven rally.

The widening gap between spot price and realized price tells a specific story.

Bitcoin spot price compared with realized price from 2020 to 2026, showing realized price rising steadily while spot price overshoots during major bull market phases.Realized price continues to trend upward as spot price becomes more volatile, indicating deeper capital commitment without a corresponding increase in transaction activity.

Capital is entering at a higher cost basis. Existing holders are not transacting more frequently. Network velocity is declining.

Bitcoin is increasingly functioning as collateral, a treasury asset, and a long-duration store of value. Those roles are materially different from the transactional adoption narratives often implied by rising prices.

This chart adds economic depth to the broader picture. Bitcoin is being accumulated, while circulation continues to slow.

Related Reading

Only one Bitcoin treasury is handling the brutal market shift that left Strategy investors totally exposed

New data shows one Japanese operator is thriving while the rest of the sector is trapped in "repair mode" valuation.

Jan 20, 2026 · Gino Matos

A regime shift, not a cycle

The final chart puts numbers behind what the earlier charts suggest.

By calculating a rolling 90-day correlation between the adoption index and spot price, it becomes possible to see how tightly price has tracked on-chain usage over time.

From 2020 through most of 2021, the correlation remained consistently positive. Price moved in step with adoption, reflecting organic network growth. In 2022, the correlation turned sharply negative as price collapsed faster than usage, a typical capitulation phase.

Rolling 90-day correlation between Bitcoin price and on-chain adoption from 2020 to 2026, showing a stable relationship before 2022 and increased instability after ETFs launch.The historical relationship between price and adoption has become increasingly unstable in the ETF era, marking a shift away from price movements driven by on-chain usage.

After ETFs entered the market, that relationship became unstable.

Correlation now swings between positive and negative, often remaining below zero for extended periods. Price movements increasingly fail to reflect changes in on-chain engagement.

For the first time in Bitcoin’s history, price appreciation is no longer reliably associated with rising on-chain adoption.

That change reflects a shift in how Bitcoin is owned, accessed, and valued.

What this means for Bitcoin adoption

None of this suggests Bitcoin is failing.

What the data shows is a network moving into a different phase of its life cycle.

On-chain adoption appears to have peaked in 2021. The 2024–2025 rally was driven primarily by price discovery away from the base layer. ETFs introduced a structural decoupling between price and usage. Rising realized prices signal conviction among existing holders rather than an expanding user base.

Supporting data from UTXO age bands reinforces this picture. Older coins account for a growing share of supply, while short-term UTXOs show weaker growth. Exchange netflows also point toward accumulation rather than distribution, and transaction counts have remained broadly flat since 2022, even as prices more than doubled.

UTXO Count - Age Bands shows the number of UTXOs that were last moved within a specified age band.Each colored band represents the number of UTXOs in existence, that were last moved within the denoted time period.UTXO Count – Age Bands shows the number of UTXOs that were last moved within a specified age band. Each colored band represents the number of UTXOs in existence, that were last moved within the denoted time period. (Source: CryptoQuant)

Bitcoin is entering a more capital-intensive, lower-velocity phase.

That shift does not invalidate the asset. It changes how adoption should be measured and how price should be interpreted.

Reading price as a proxy for usage no longer works in the ETF era.

Bitcoin is being bought, enthusiastically and at scale. It is simply being used less than it once was.

The blockchain has been signalling that change for some time. The charts make it difficult to ignore.

The post Bitcoin’s $100k breakout silently crippled its adoption curve as on-chain metrics crater appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

De Britse financiële waakhond, de FCA, komt in 2026 met nieuwe regels speciaal voor crypto bedrijven. Wat direct opvalt: de toezichthouder laat enkele klassieke financiële verplichtingen los om beter aan te sluiten op de snelle en grillige wereld van digitale activa. Tegelijkertijd wordt er extra nadruk gelegd op digitale beveiliging,... Het bericht FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt verscheen het eerst op Blockchain Stories.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:33
United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August

United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August

The post United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers. The author will not be held responsible for information that is found at the end of links posted on this page. If not otherwise explicitly mentioned in the body of the article, at the time of writing, the author has no position in any stock mentioned in this article and no business relationship with any company mentioned. The author has not received compensation for writing this article, other than from FXStreet. FXStreet and the author do not provide personalized recommendations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. FXStreet and the author will not be liable for any errors, omissions or any losses, injuries or damages arising from this information and its display or use. Errors and omissions excepted. The author and FXStreet are not registered investment advisors and nothing in this article is intended…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:20
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00