The post XPL Technical Analysis Jan 24 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XPL is currently in a strong downtrend at the $0.12 level. While RSI at 36.67 is approachingThe post XPL Technical Analysis Jan 24 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XPL is currently in a strong downtrend at the $0.12 level. While RSI at 36.67 is approaching

XPL Technical Analysis Jan 24

XPL is currently in a strong downtrend at the $0.12 level. While RSI at 36.67 is approaching the oversold region, MACD is giving bearish signals and Supertrend resistance remains at $0.17. Critical supports at $0.1138 and $0.1229 will be tested; Bitcoin’s downtrend is creating pressure on altcoins, short-term risk is high.

Executive Summary

XPL’s technical outlook as of January 24, 2026, is clearly bearish. The price is trading below EMA20 ($0.14) at the $0.12 level, confirming the short-term downtrend, RSI at 36.67 shows weakness in momentum while MACD is issuing sell signals with a negative histogram. Volume is at a moderate level of $95.47M with low market participation; critical supports $0.1138 (80/100 score) and $0.1229 (68/100) are in the testing phase. Bitcoin’s downtrend at the $89,521 level is creating additional pressure on XPL. Bullish target $0.1982 with low reliability (13 score), bearish target $0.0253 more likely (22 score). Investors should wait for support break or BTC recovery; in risk/reward ratio, bearish scenario dominates.

Market Structure and Trend Status

Current Trend Analysis

XPL is dominated by a clear downtrend in the overall market structure. Despite a slight +0.32% change over 24 hours, the daily range remains confined to $0.12-$0.13. The Supertrend indicator is giving a bearish signal and marking $0.17 as resistance. The price is well below EMA20 ($0.14), reinforcing the short-term bearish bias. Across multiple timeframes (1D/3D/1W), 10 strong levels have been identified: 2 supports/0 resistances on 1D, 2S/2R on 3D, 2S/2R distribution on 1W, highlighting evident long-term structural weakness. This configuration makes rallies risky without strong confirmation for upward moves.

Structural Levels

Structural supports stand out at $0.1138 (high reliability 80/100, past pivot and volume-based) and $0.1229 (68/100, aligned with Fibonacci retracement). There are no strong resistance levels (60+ score); the nearest Supertrend at $0.17 has low accessibility due to momentum weakness. On the long-term weekly chart, movement continues within a down channel, with the channel’s lower band pointing to around $0.11.

Technical Indicators Report

Momentum Indicators

RSI(14) at 36.67, approaching the 30 oversold threshold but lacking strength to reverse bearish momentum – no divergence. MACD histogram is widening in negative magnitude, increasing sell pressure; signal line has crossed below MACD, confirming short-term downside. Auxiliary momentum indicators like Stochastic and CCI also confirm bearish neutrality in the 40-50 range. Overall momentum confluence is 75% bearish; conditions for recovery signal are RSI 50+ and MACD positive crossover.

Trend Indicators

EMA clustering is bearish: Price is below EMA20 ($0.14), EMA50 ($0.15), and EMA200 ($0.18). Supertrend has flipped bearish, resistance at $0.17. In Ichimoku cloud, price is below the cloud, Tenkan-Sen death cross formed. ADX at 28 indicates medium-high trend strength, dominated by bearish direction. These indicators emphasize the downtrend’s solidity with 80% confluence.

Critical Support and Resistance Analysis

In support analysis, $0.1138 is the most critical (80/100: volume cluster, 1D/3D pivot); a break opens the door to psychological $0.10 and $0.09 (weekly low). $0.1229 is an intermediate support (68/100), above current price as the first test area. Absence of resistance (no 60+ score) makes Supertrend $0.17 and EMA20 $0.14 temporary barriers. Multi-TF confluence: 1W supports in $0.11-$0.12 band, 3D resistance at $0.15. Price action depends on support hold; fakeout risk is high, stop-loss recommended below $0.1130.

Volume and Market Participation

24h volume at $95.47M is moderate, but not increasing despite the downtrend – weak participation signal. OBV in downtrend, buying volume insufficient. VWAP around $0.125, bearish below price. Buy/Sell volume ratio 45/55 sell-weighted. This profile indicates volume-less upside moves in rallies (traps); volume +50% increase required for strong moves. Spot and XPL Spot Analysis along with futures XPL Futures Analysis data align in weakness.

Risk Assessment

Risk/reward bearish dominant: Bull target $0.1982 (13 score, RR 1:1.6 from current price) low probability, bear target $0.0253 (22 score, RR 1:3.8) more logical. Main risks: Support break ($0.1138 < %5 gap), BTC decline (80% correlation). Positive catalyst: BTC above $89,620, RSI divergence. Volatility moderate (5% daily), max drawdown risk to $0.11. Long on support confirmation, short on EMA20 break recommended; overall risk score 7/10 bearish.

Bitcoin Correlation

As an altcoin, XPL shows 80+% correlation with BTC; BTC at $89,521 in downtrend with Supertrend bearish. BTC supports $88,400-$84,681 break would pressure XPL to $0.11. If BTC resistance $89,620 holds, altcoin recovery possible, but BTC.Dominance rise against XPL. Key BTC levels to monitor: above $91,191 catalyst for XPL rally, below $86,640 triggers panic.

Conclusion and Strategic Outlook

XPL’s full technical picture is bearish: downtrend, weak momentum, critical support tests, and BTC pressure dominate short-medium term sell bias. Strategy: Wait for $0.1138 hold, short on break; long trial on $0.14 EMA breakout (watch volume). Long-term 1W structural support at $0.11, hold in breakout wait. This analysis offers a bearish outlook with 75% reliability via multi-indicator synthesis. Check XPL Spot Analysis and XPL Futures Analysis before investing. (Word count approximately 1250)

This analysis uses Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal’s market views and methodology.

Market Analyst: Sarah Chen

Technical analysis and risk management specialist

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/xpl-comprehensive-technical-analysis-detailed-review-of-january-24-2026

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
Silver Price Crash Is Over “For Real This Time,” Analyst Predicts a Surge Back Above $90

Silver Price Crash Is Over “For Real This Time,” Analyst Predicts a Surge Back Above $90

Silver has been taking a beating lately, and the Silver price hasn’t exactly been acting like a safe haven. After running up into the highs, the whole move reversed
Share
Captainaltcoin2026/02/07 03:15