China’s rapid embrace of robotics is reshaping everyday life and positioning the country as a global leader in advanced technologies.While the US remains focusedChina’s rapid embrace of robotics is reshaping everyday life and positioning the country as a global leader in advanced technologies.While the US remains focused

China is ‘leaps and bounds ahead’ in robotics, experts says

China’s rapid embrace of robotics is reshaping everyday life and positioning the country as a global leader in advanced technologies.

While the US remains focused on artificial intelligence (AI) chips only, China has already achieved dominance in robotics, clean-tech, and other strategic sectors, said Elizabeth Economy in a CNBC interview today.

In fact, China is currently “leaps and bounds” ahead of the US in robotics, added the former senior advisor for China at the US Department of Commerce.

China is aggressively pouring resources into robotics

According to Elizabeth Economy, Beijing’s progress in robotics isn’t entirely about innovation but “scale” as well.

Under the “Made in China 2025” initiative, the world’s second-largest economy has poured human and financial resources into robotics, medical devices, semiconductors, and clean energy.

And the results are visible: hotels across China deploy robots for room service, restaurants rely on robotic servers, and autonomous vehicles are already being tested in dozens of cities.

Speaking with CNBC, Economy said Beijing has deployed over a quarter-million robots already – versus about 10,000 only in the US, highlighting a massive gap in adoption.  

This scale advantage allows Chinese firms to refine technologies faster, integrate AI into robotics more deeply, and normalise their use across industries.

Every day exposure to robotics in China doesn’t just reflect technological advancement but cultural acceptance, reinforcing the country’s leadership position as well.

Implications of China’s dominance for the US

For the US, its economic rival, China’s dominance in robotics raises significant strategic concerns.

While American companies are advancing in AI chips and select robotics applications, the lack of comparable deployment means the US may fall behind in sectors critical to national competitiveness.

According to Elizabeth Economy, if the US fails to match China’s pace, it could lose influence in setting global standards for robotics and AI integration.

Moreover, the gap in deployment scale suggests American firms may struggle to achieve the same level of efficiency or consumer acceptance.

All in all, the challenge for Washington is not only technological but also policy-driven requiring greater investment and a broader vision beyond semiconductors.

What it mean for the US stock market?

China’s emerging leadership in robotics has crucial implications for the US stock market as well.

As Chinese firms scale faster and dominate markets, investors may increasingly favour them over US counterparts – thereby redirecting the overall flow of global capital.

Economy’s remarks imply US stocks tied to robotics and automation could face valuation pressure if they fail to keep pace.

For American markets, this would mean a potential rebalancing of investor portfolios – with more funds flowing into Chinese tech stocks.

Such a major shift may weaken the US advantage in attracting global capital, especially if domestic firms remain focused narrowly on AI chips while China builds dominance across multiple strategic sectors.

In short, the message is clear for US investors: ignoring Beijing’s robotics surge risks missing out on one of the most transformative growth stories of the decade.

The post China is 'leaps and bounds ahead' in robotics, experts says appeared first on Invezz

Market Opportunity
Cyberlife Logo
Cyberlife Price(LIFE)
$0.0362
$0.0362$0.0362
0.00%
USD
Cyberlife (LIFE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Forward Industries Bets Big on Solana With $4B Capital Plan

Forward Industries Bets Big on Solana With $4B Capital Plan

The firm has filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to launch a $4 billion at-the-market (ATM) equity program, […] The post Forward Industries Bets Big on Solana With $4B Capital Plan appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 04:15
Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework

Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework

Coinbase Payments has joined the Open Intents Framework as a core contributor, working alongside Ethereum Foundation and other major players. The initiative aims to simplify complex multi-chain interactions through automated solver technology. The post Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework appeared first on Coinspeaker.
Share
Coinspeaker2025/09/18 02:43