The post Jump Trading Hit with $4B lawsuit Tied to Terra’s $50B Crash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The administrator of Terraform Labs’ bankruptcy, ToddThe post Jump Trading Hit with $4B lawsuit Tied to Terra’s $50B Crash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The administrator of Terraform Labs’ bankruptcy, Todd

Jump Trading Hit with $4B lawsuit Tied to Terra’s $50B Crash

The administrator of Terraform Labs’ bankruptcy, Todd Snyder, has filed a lawsuit seeking $4 billion in damages from trading company Jump Trading and multiple executives.

According to a Friday Wall Street Journal report, the lawsuit alleges that Jump Trading unlawfully profited from and contributed to the 2022 crash of Terra. Alongside the company, the suit is also aimed at its co-founder, William DiSomma, and the former president of the crypto trading department, Kanav Kariya.

Terraform Labs and the Terra blockchain ecosystem collapsed in 2022 when its native algorithmic stablecoin, TerraUSD (UST), lost its peg to the US dollar. The stablecoin was backed by a Terra inflationary mechanism, and when the peg was lost, the LUNA token saw an issuance and sell-off shock. The crash led to about $50 billion in losses.

Snyder reportedly said in the filing that Jump “actively exploited” the Terraform ecosystem through manipulation and self-dealing, and that the lawsuit is aimed at recovering losses for creditors and harmed investors, the WSJ reported.

Jump Trading did not immediately respond to Cointelegraph’s request for comment. The WSJ reported that Jump has denied the allegations.

Terra price chart. Source: CoinMarketCap

Related: From TerraUSD to YU: Why stablecoins fail to hold $1 and the risks investors can’t ignore

Alleged secret agreements and manipulation

According to the report, the new lawsuit claims that Jump and Terraform entered into a series of secret agreements. The trading firm would have the option to purchase large quantities of LUNA at a steep discount, having been permitted to acquire millions of LUNA at $0.40 when it was trading at over $110.

In exchange, Jump Trading was also reportedly expected to keep TerraUSD’s peg to the US dollar, which would hide faults in the algorithmic peg mechanism. The lawsuit also reportedly claims that this was kept as a secret “gentlemen’s agreement” to avoid regulatory scrutiny. Following the first depegging event, the trading company also allegedly claimed that the peg was restored thanks to the mechanism, rather than disclosing its involvement.

According to the WSJ, the lawsuit states that the Luna Foundation Guard Bitcoin (BTC) reserve, which was meant to protect TerraUSD against depegs, was directed by Terraform co-founder and CEO Do Kwon and Kariya. This organization reportedly transferred nearly 50,000 BTC to Jump Trading without a written agreement determining how they would be spent.

Kwon pled guilty in the US in August and was sentenced to 15 years in prison earlier this month. In November, he had asked a US judge to cap his prison time at five years, with prosecutors in South Korea pushing for a sentence of up to 40 years.

Not Jump Trading’s first lawsuit over Terra

The accusations against Jump are not new. A May 2023 — and still ongoing — lawsuit alleged the trading company manipulated the price of TerraUSD. Plaintiffs in that case accused Jump of violating the Commodity Exchange Act and unjust enrichment. The lawsuit reads:

Just months after the lawsuit was filed, Kariya stepped down from his role amid reports of a Commodities and Futures Trading Commission investigation.

The company’s involvement with Terra also attracted the attention of the US Securities and Exchange Commission. At the end of 2024, Jump’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Tai Mo Shan, paid a $123 million settlement with the SEC for “misleading investors about the stability of Terra USD.”

Related: Crypto exec to pay $10M to settle SEC claims over betting on TerraUSD

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/jump-trading-4b-lawsuit-tied-to-50b-terra-crash?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Market Opportunity
Jump Tom Logo
Jump Tom Price(JUMP)
$0.000000000000000000000001
$0.000000000000000000000001$0.000000000000000000000001
0.00%
USD
Jump Tom (JUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Zimbabwean Doctor Pushes for Appeal in $550,000 Crypto Theft Case

Zimbabwean Doctor Pushes for Appeal in $550,000 Crypto Theft Case

The post Zimbabwean Doctor Pushes for Appeal in $550,000 Crypto Theft Case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A prominent Zimbabwean eye specialist is demanding
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/20 20:59
Load The Bags! Bitcoin MVRV Hits Key Accumulation Threshold

Load The Bags! Bitcoin MVRV Hits Key Accumulation Threshold

The post Load The Bags! Bitcoin MVRV Hits Key Accumulation Threshold appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Load The Bags! Bitcoin MVRV Hits Key Accumulation
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/20 21:10