The post Blockchain Fragmentation Is Costing Tokenized Assets Billions appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Fragmentation across blockchain networks is already The post Blockchain Fragmentation Is Costing Tokenized Assets Billions appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Fragmentation across blockchain networks is already

Blockchain Fragmentation Is Costing Tokenized Assets Billions

Fragmentation across blockchain networks is already imposing a measurable economic cost on the tokenized asset market, with inefficiencies translating into up to $1.3 billion in annual value drag. 

In a report sent to Cointelegraph, real-world asset (RWA) data provider RWA.io argued that while blockchains accelerated innovation, they also created walls that trap liquidity and prevent capital from moving freely across networks. 

As a result, tokenized RWAs have increasingly behaved like disconnected markets rather than a single, unified financial system. The research found that identical or economically equivalent assets routinely trade at different prices across chains, while moving capital between networks remained costly and complex. 

Researchers stated that these inefficiencies hinder the market’s ability to self-correct through arbitrage, a mechanism that facilitates efficient price discovery.

“This fragmentation is the single greatest impediment to the market realizing its multi-trillion-dollar potential,” said Marko Vidrih, co-founder and chief operating officer at RWA.io.

“In traditional finance, the EU-wide SEPA Instant mandate shows how value can move across accounts in seconds. Tokenized assets should be just as frictionless,” Vidrih added.

RWA market growth from 2020 to 2025. Source: RWA.io

Price inefficiencies and capital friction across chains

The report states that one of the most obvious consequences of fragmentation is the persistent price divergence for identical assets issued on different blockchains. 

According to the report, economically identical tokenized assets often trade at spreads of 1% to 3% across major networks, despite representing claims on the same underlying assets. In traditional finance, arbitrage would quickly eliminate such market gaps. 

However, crosschain arbitrage remains unviable due to technical hurdles, fees, delays and operational risks, the report claims. It states that the costs to relocate assets often exceed the price discrepancy, allowing inefficiencies to persist. 

Beyond price discovery, RWA.io estimated that moving capital between non-interoperable chains results in losses of 2% to 5% per transaction. This is because of exchange fees, slippage, transfer costs, gas fees and timing risks. In aggregate, the report models an average loss of about 3.5% per capital reallocation.

Should these fragmentation patterns persist, RWA.io estimated that the friction costs could drain between $600 million and $1.3 billion from the market annually. 

Economic costs of market fragmentation. Source: RWA.io

RWA.io projects that tokenized real-world assets could grow into a $16 trillion to $30 trillion market by 2030, and warns that if current inefficiencies persist, the associated value drag would scale with it.

Applying today’s fragmentation-related frictions to a market of that size implies potential annual losses of $30 billion to $75 billion, turning infrastructure shortcomings into a material constraint on long-term growth.

Related: Tokenized stocks may be onchain, but the SEC still wants the keys

Tokenized assets gain traction despite inefficiencies 

Despite claims of inefficiency, tokenized assets continue to gain traction across both crypto-native platforms and traditional financial institutions. Just this week, companies have made moves to tokenize equities. 

On Tuesday, RWA-focused company Securitize announced plans to launch compliant, onchain stock trading.

On Thursday, crypto exchange Coinbase launched a stock trading feature, allowing users to invest directly in stocks through its application. 

Magazine: Koreans ‘pump’ alts after Upbit hack, China BTC mining surge: Asia Express

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/blockchain-fragmentation-cost-tokenized-assets-report?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Market Opportunity
1 Logo
1 Price(1)
$0.006687
$0.006687$0.006687
+15.99%
USD
1 (1) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Zimbabwean Doctor Pushes for Appeal in $550,000 Crypto Theft Case

Zimbabwean Doctor Pushes for Appeal in $550,000 Crypto Theft Case

The post Zimbabwean Doctor Pushes for Appeal in $550,000 Crypto Theft Case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A prominent Zimbabwean eye specialist is demanding
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/20 20:59
Load The Bags! Bitcoin MVRV Hits Key Accumulation Threshold

Load The Bags! Bitcoin MVRV Hits Key Accumulation Threshold

The post Load The Bags! Bitcoin MVRV Hits Key Accumulation Threshold appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Load The Bags! Bitcoin MVRV Hits Key Accumulation
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/20 21:10