Trump administration has started reviewing license applications to ship Nvidia's H200 AI chips to China with a 25% fee.Trump administration has started reviewing license applications to ship Nvidia's H200 AI chips to China with a 25% fee.

Trump rethinks China tech curbs amid Nvidia H200 review

The Trump administration has reportedly started examining applications that could lead to the first-ever shipments of Nvidia’s H200 artificial intelligence chips to China. This development comes as President Donald Trump also signed new legislation giving the government broader authority to block American money from flowing into Chinese technology companies.

Trump announced earlier this month that he planned to permit sales of Nvidia’s H200 processors to China, with Washington collecting a 25% fee on each transaction. The president argued these sales would benefit American companies by reducing Chinese demand for domestically-produced chips, helping U.S. firms maintain their competitive edge.

The proposal has sparked sharp criticism from lawmakers and former officials across party lines who worry the powerful chips could boost Beijing’s military capabilities and weaken America’s lead in artificial intelligence development.

Four agencies review export applications

The Commerce Department, which handles export decisions, has forwarded license requests for the chip sales to three other agencies – State, Energy, and Defense – for their input, the sources told Reuters. They spoke anonymously because the review process is not public information.

Under current rules, these agencies have 30 days to provide their assessments. An administration official told the review would be comprehensive and “not some perfunctory box we are checking.” However, Trump will make the final call regardless of what the other departments recommend.

A White House representative would not discuss the ongoing process but stated “the Trump administration is committed to ensuring the dominance of the American tech stack, without compromising on national security.”

The Biden administration had previously blocked sales of advanced AI chips to China and other nations that might serve as pathways for smuggling the technology to Beijing. Officials cited national security risks as the reason for these restrictions.

Trump’s current stance marks a sharp change from his approach during his first presidency, when he took aggressive steps to limit Chinese access to American technology. At that time, he pointed to allegations that Beijing steals U.S. intellectual property and uses commercially-purchased technology for military purposes, claims China denies.

White House AI czar David Sacks and other Trump administration members now contend that selling advanced chips to China actually discourages Chinese companies like Huawei from working harder to match the cutting-edge designs from Nvidia and AMD.

As reported by Cryptopolitan previously, Nvidia was looking at ramping up H200 production after early orders from China exceeded available supply. While H200 chips perform slower than Nvidia’s current Blackwell processors for many AI applications, they remain widely used and have never been approved for Chinese buyers.

Trump initially considered allowing sales of a less-powerful version of Blackwell chips but changed course and settled on the H200 instead.

Congress passes sweeping investment restrictions

On the investment front, President Trump has now signed into law the most sweeping measures yet for monitoring and restricting where American dollars go in Chinese technology businesses. The provisions specifically target companies that strengthen Beijing’s military and surveillance operations.

The restrictions are included in the annual National Defense Authorization Act, which identifies entities in China and other problematic countries, Cuba, North Korea, Venezuela and Russia, working on technologies with both commercial and military uses.

“Investments propping up Communist China’s aggression must come to an end,” House Speaker Mike Johnson said earlier this month.

The House approved the NDAA last week and the Senate passed it Wednesday, both with large bipartisan support.

The law makes permanent and expands a 2023 executive order from the Biden administration. Congress is now writing into law the authority to watch, and sometimes stop, U.S. financing of Chinese work on emerging technologies including artificial intelligence, quantum computing and advanced semiconductors.

The law lets the president use International Emergency Economic Powers Act sanctions to prevent Americans from buying significant ownership stakes or debt in certain Chinese companies.

The targeted entities include those based in China, Hong Kong and Macau, state-owned businesses, and companies connected to Chinese Communist Party officials.

Even transactions that don’t get blocked will require mandatory reporting, forcing U.S. companies to notify the government about deals involving sensitive Chinese technologies.

A Chinese Embassy spokesperson in Washington criticized the legislation, saying it was “overstretching the concept of national security” and would “distort normal investment flows between the two countries.”

Senator John Cornyn of Texas, who championed the legislation over five years, stated: “Every dollar invested in China by a United States investor into a Chinese company is a dollar that’s going toward the potential production of weapons and technology that one day may be used to kill Americans.”

Senator Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada said America’s national security future depends on “making sure we remain ahead of our adversaries in the race to develop cutting-edge technologies like AI and semiconductors.”

Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

Market Opportunity
OFFICIAL TRUMP Logo
OFFICIAL TRUMP Price(TRUMP)
$5.098
$5.098$5.098
-1.50%
USD
OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Mastercard Partners With Polygon to Enable Crypto Payments for Consumers and Merchants

Mastercard Partners With Polygon to Enable Crypto Payments for Consumers and Merchants

Mastercard is expanding its Crypto Credential system to self-custody wallets through a partnership with Polygon and Mercuyo. The firm has broadened its presence
Share
Crypto News Flash2025/12/19 19:03
USD holds firm despite soft November CPI – ING

USD holds firm despite soft November CPI – ING

The post USD holds firm despite soft November CPI – ING appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The US Dollar (USD) is proving surprisingly resilient despite the release
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/19 19:08