The COA previously upheld three other Davao City projects awarded to E. Gardiola Construction, all found overpriced, structurally non-compliant, and using substandardThe COA previously upheld three other Davao City projects awarded to E. Gardiola Construction, all found overpriced, structurally non-compliant, and using substandard

COA affirms disallowance of 330% overpriced Gardiola road project in Davao

2025/12/17 08:06

MANILA, Philippines – The Commission on Audit (COA) has upheld the disallowance of payments for a more than P19-million road improvement project in Davao City after finding it overpriced by over 330% and riddled with construction deficiencies.

In a decision released on Monday, December 15, the COA en banc affirmed the ruling of state auditors in Davao Region on the P19.29-million Ma-a Radio Station Road–Davao City Diversion Road project undertaken by E. Gardiola Construction.

The firm is registered under the brother of Construction Workers Solidarity (CWS) Party-list Representative Edwin Gardiola.

Must Read

Lawmakers and construction firm contractors: The ties that bind

Auditors said the contract price of P19.289 million exceeded COA’s estimated project cost of P4.478 million by 330.69%.

They also found that the project failed to comply with the standards set by the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH).

An inspection cited rusty rails, bolts, nuts and washers, guardrail posts without concrete foundations, and substandard road signs, pavement studs and guardrails, auditors said.

COA held liable DPWH district engineer Lorna Ricardo, assistant district engineer Milagros delos Reyes, engineers Dwight Vincent Fernandez, Eduardo Villar, Johnny dela Peña and Bernardo Engalan, construction and maintenance foreman William Paglinawan, and contractor E. Gardiola Construction.

Must Read

Inside Gardiola’s buy-and-sell DPWH project modus in Congress

The commission ordered them to refund P13.6 million in disallowed payments.

A technician, Rolly Tulayba, whose role was limited to zinc coating of the guardrails, was held liable for P4.76 million along with other officials of the DPWH-Davao City District Engineering Office.

“Since a disallowance or an audit finding of overpricing is not merely an audit opinion but an adjudication involving conclusions of wrong-doing on the part of the management causing damage to the government for which a financial recovery is to be exacted through the amount of disallowance, the amount of evidence to support the disallowance should be such as to establish with a reliable degree of certainty, the finding of overpricing,” read part of the 17-page COA en banc decision.

The COA said the matter would be referred to the Office of the Ombudsman for possible criminal and administrative charges.

Incidentally, the COA also noted that it had previously issued three other rulings sustaining disallowances involving separate infrastructure projects in Davao City, all awarded to E. Gardiola Construction.

Those projects were likewise found to be allegedly overpriced, failed to comply with structural requirements, and used substandard materials.

Documents showed the project was awarded in 2009 to E. Gardiola Construction under the DPWH’s Traffic Safety Project.

The DPWH later certified the project as completed in 89 days, prompting the release of full payment to the contractor on August 25, 2025.

The project was covered by a special audit conducted by COA-Davao on projects implemented by the DPWH in the region.

“Upon audit, the SAT issued Audit Observation Memorandum (AOM) No. 2011-1513 dated December 27, 2011 noting that the traffic safety project was grossly overpriced and not done in accordance with the approved plans and specifications as well as the contract,” the COA stated.

The COA found Ricardo liable for “authorizing the implementation and payments of the overpriced project,” while project engineers were faulted for allowing payment despite having reviewed project plans, programs of work, and detailed cost estimates that already showed inflated prices. – Rappler.com

Market Opportunity
Alliance Games Logo
Alliance Games Price(COA)
$0.006084
$0.006084$0.006084
-0.68%
USD
Alliance Games (COA) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX presale hits $7.5M with tokens at $0.024 and 30% bonus code BLOCK30, while Solana holds $243 and Avalanche builds a $1B treasury to attract institutions.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 01:07
Singapore Entrepreneur Loses Entire Crypto Portfolio After Downloading Fake Game

Singapore Entrepreneur Loses Entire Crypto Portfolio After Downloading Fake Game

The post Singapore Entrepreneur Loses Entire Crypto Portfolio After Downloading Fake Game appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief A Singapore-based man has
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/18 05:17