The first TAO halving is projected for mid-December 2025, though exact timing remains fluid due to Bittensor’s unique mechanics. Unlike Bitcoin’s straightforward halving, TAO operates on a multi-layered system where subnet tokens, liquidity pools, alpha burns, root proportions, and flow-based emissions interact in ways that affect every participant differently. Expert Andy notes that these complexities […]The first TAO halving is projected for mid-December 2025, though exact timing remains fluid due to Bittensor’s unique mechanics. Unlike Bitcoin’s straightforward halving, TAO operates on a multi-layered system where subnet tokens, liquidity pools, alpha burns, root proportions, and flow-based emissions interact in ways that affect every participant differently. Expert Andy notes that these complexities […]

TAO Halving Impact: Alpha Tokens, Liquidity, and Subnet Survival Strategies

2025/11/30 14:30
  1. TAO halving reduces block emissions from 1 to 0.5 TAO, tightening an already deflationary system.
  2. Subnet alpha tokens face structural pressure as liquidity drops, creating winners and losers before price changes appear.
  3. Post-halving, survival depends on strong fundamentals, sustained flows, and strategic staking choices.

The first TAO halving is projected for mid-December 2025, though exact timing remains fluid due to Bittensor’s unique mechanics. Unlike Bitcoin’s straightforward halving, TAO operates on a multi-layered system where subnet tokens, liquidity pools, alpha burns, root proportions, and flow-based emissions interact in ways that affect every participant differently.

Expert Andy notes that these complexities mean traditional supply shock narratives only tell part of the story. The halving triggers when total issued the token reaches 10.5 million, not circulating supply, accounting for recycled tokens from subnet registrations, miner and validator activity, and other on-chain actions.

With current block emissions at 1 TAO per 12-second block, roughly 7,200 TAO enter circulation daily. After the halving, this falls to 3,600 TAO per day, cutting annual issuance from around 2.6 million to 1.3 million.

Subnets Introduce Individual Alpha Tokens and AMM Swaps

Alpha tokens are assigned now to every subnet. In the case when the TAO is staked into a subnet, it is replaced with alpha by an automated market maker. The alpha distribution is divided into alpha out and alpha in, which represent rewards to the participants and liquidity to the pool, respectively. The alpha_ in is cut by half, and the alpha out does not change.

This structural change increases volatility: miners who must sell alpha to make ends meet now are exposed to less liquidity, and it puts pressure on the alpha prices downwards. Small pool subnets are the most susceptible to attack, whereas early, well-financed subnets become permanently advantaged.

Alpha token trajectories are also influenced by the halving, shifting one subnet halving towards the future. Subnets with alpha building up until halving have the advantage of experiencing a quicker early supply growth, and subnets with halving after have a worse liquidity situation.

Performance Depends on TAO Flows, Coverage, and Alpha Burns

The downsizing doubles the competitive nature of the network. Subnets should be able to attract sticky capital and create real utility to exist. Weak subnets will be at risk of deregistration as slots will be occupied, and miners and validators will migrate to better subnets. Root staking offers a safer option, which conserves TAO but yields diminish with time.

Expert Andy stresses that it is now survival and profit based on observation of net TAO flows, coverage percentages, and alpha burn rates, as opposed to price. Subnets with better coverage and stable alpha burns will perform better, and those that are not able to sustain liquidity will experience a higher rate of decomposition.

Also Read: Bittensor Price Pullback Could Ignite Explosive Bullish Wave Toward $748 Zone

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28
Shytoshi Kusama Addresses $2.4 Million Shibarium Bridge Exploit

Shytoshi Kusama Addresses $2.4 Million Shibarium Bridge Exploit

The post Shytoshi Kusama Addresses $2.4 Million Shibarium Bridge Exploit appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The lead developer of Shiba Inu, Shytoshi Kusama, has publicly addressed the Shibarium bridge exploit that occurred recently, draining $2.4 million from the network. After days of speculation about his involvement in managing the crisis, the project leader broke his silence. Kusama emphasized that a special “war room” has been set up to restore stolen finances and enhance network security. The statement is his first official words since the bridge compromise occurred. “Although I am focusing on AI initiatives to benefit all our tokens, I remain with the developers and leadership in the war room,” Kusama posted on social media platform X. He dismissed claims that he had distanced himself from the project as “utterly preposterous.” The developer said that the reason behind his silence at first was strategic. Before he could make any statements publicly, he must have taken time to evaluate what he termed a complex and deep situation properly. Kusama also vowed to provide further updates in the official Shiba Inu channels as the team comes up with long-term solutions. As highlighted in our previous article, targeted Shibarium’s bridge infrastructure through a sophisticated attack vector. Hackers gained unauthorized access to validator signing keys, compromising the network’s security framework. The hackers executed a flash loan to acquire 4.6 million BONE ShibaSwap tokens. The validator power on the network was majority held by them after this purchase. They were able to transfer assets out of Shibarium with this control. The response of Shibarium developers was timely to limit the breach. They instantly halted all validator functions in order to avoid additional exploitation. The team proceeded to deposit the assets under staking in a multisig hardware wallet that is secure. External security companies were involved in the investigation effort. Hexens, Seal 911, and PeckShield are collaborating with internal developers to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:46