The post NFTs are coming back but Blue Chip projects are on life support appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. NFT trading activity showed signs of life in Q3 2025, breaking a long stretch of decline that defined the post-hype years. After two years of contraction and shifting narratives, on-chain markets found a new footing, not in blue-chip collectibles or speculative art, but in cheaper rails, loyalty programs, and sport-linked assets that traded more on utility than status. NFT trading volume rose in Q3 2025 and sales counts reached a high. The center of gravity shifted to cheaper rails and utilitarian use cases as Ethereum’s scaling upgrade pushed activity to L2s, Solana leaned on throughput and compression, and Bitcoin inscriptions matured into a collectibles culture that waxes and wanes with fee markets. Fees and distribution, not profile pictures, now set the boundary for growth. Post-Dencun economics reset the map. Ethereum’s EIP-4844 cut data costs for rollups, pushing L2 transaction fees toward cents and enabling gasless or sponsored flows for mainstream-facing mints. L2 fees fell by more than 90 percent in the wake of the upgrade, a shift already visible in mint behavior and the rise of Base as a distribution rail. On Solana, compression brought mass issuance into range for loyalty and access use cases, with provisioning costs for 10 million compressed NFTs around 7.7 SOL and median transaction fees near $0.003 even under load. Bitcoin inscriptions carved out a separate lane tied to mempool cycles and miner revenue, with more than 80 million inscriptions by February 2025 and a top-three position by lifetime NFT sales. The demand side shows a rebound with a caveat. DappRadar data shows that Q3 NFT trading volume almost doubled quarter over quarter to $1.58 billion as sales reached 18.1 million, an all-time quarterly high for transaction count. Sports NFTs stood out, with sales up 337 percent quarter over quarter to $71.1 million, a pocket… The post NFTs are coming back but Blue Chip projects are on life support appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. NFT trading activity showed signs of life in Q3 2025, breaking a long stretch of decline that defined the post-hype years. After two years of contraction and shifting narratives, on-chain markets found a new footing, not in blue-chip collectibles or speculative art, but in cheaper rails, loyalty programs, and sport-linked assets that traded more on utility than status. NFT trading volume rose in Q3 2025 and sales counts reached a high. The center of gravity shifted to cheaper rails and utilitarian use cases as Ethereum’s scaling upgrade pushed activity to L2s, Solana leaned on throughput and compression, and Bitcoin inscriptions matured into a collectibles culture that waxes and wanes with fee markets. Fees and distribution, not profile pictures, now set the boundary for growth. Post-Dencun economics reset the map. Ethereum’s EIP-4844 cut data costs for rollups, pushing L2 transaction fees toward cents and enabling gasless or sponsored flows for mainstream-facing mints. L2 fees fell by more than 90 percent in the wake of the upgrade, a shift already visible in mint behavior and the rise of Base as a distribution rail. On Solana, compression brought mass issuance into range for loyalty and access use cases, with provisioning costs for 10 million compressed NFTs around 7.7 SOL and median transaction fees near $0.003 even under load. Bitcoin inscriptions carved out a separate lane tied to mempool cycles and miner revenue, with more than 80 million inscriptions by February 2025 and a top-three position by lifetime NFT sales. The demand side shows a rebound with a caveat. DappRadar data shows that Q3 NFT trading volume almost doubled quarter over quarter to $1.58 billion as sales reached 18.1 million, an all-time quarterly high for transaction count. Sports NFTs stood out, with sales up 337 percent quarter over quarter to $71.1 million, a pocket…

NFTs are coming back but Blue Chip projects are on life support

NFT trading activity showed signs of life in Q3 2025, breaking a long stretch of decline that defined the post-hype years.

After two years of contraction and shifting narratives, on-chain markets found a new footing, not in blue-chip collectibles or speculative art, but in cheaper rails, loyalty programs, and sport-linked assets that traded more on utility than status.

NFT trading volume rose in Q3 2025 and sales counts reached a high.

The center of gravity shifted to cheaper rails and utilitarian use cases as Ethereum’s scaling upgrade pushed activity to L2s, Solana leaned on throughput and compression, and Bitcoin inscriptions matured into a collectibles culture that waxes and wanes with fee markets.

Fees and distribution, not profile pictures, now set the boundary for growth.

Post-Dencun economics reset the map. Ethereum’s EIP-4844 cut data costs for rollups, pushing L2 transaction fees toward cents and enabling gasless or sponsored flows for mainstream-facing mints.

L2 fees fell by more than 90 percent in the wake of the upgrade, a shift already visible in mint behavior and the rise of Base as a distribution rail.

On Solana, compression brought mass issuance into range for loyalty and access use cases, with provisioning costs for 10 million compressed NFTs around 7.7 SOL and median transaction fees near $0.003 even under load.

Bitcoin inscriptions carved out a separate lane tied to mempool cycles and miner revenue, with more than 80 million inscriptions by February 2025 and a top-three position by lifetime NFT sales.

The demand side shows a rebound with a caveat.

DappRadar data shows that Q3 NFT trading volume almost doubled quarter over quarter to $1.58 billion as sales reached 18.1 million, an all-time quarterly high for transaction count.

Sports NFTs stood out, with sales up 337 percent quarter over quarter to $71.1 million, a pocket where schedulable utility, access and loyalty benefits drive spend independent of floor prices. The summer delivered a snapback before a cooldown.

Monthly sales hit $574 million in July 2025, the second-highest month of the year, then fell roughly 25 percent month over month in September as broader crypto risk appetite eased, based on CryptoSlam tallies.

The pattern reinforces a lower average sale value regime and shows how GMV tracks crypto beta even as unique users and utility categories hold up.

Distribution, not just fees, is doing more of the work. Wallets with embedded passkeys and sponsored fees remove onboarding friction that stalled prior cycles. Coinbase Smart Wallet supports passkeys and gas sponsorship in supported apps, and Phantom reported 15 million monthly active users in January 2025, a base that routes into mobile and social mint funnels.

That reach matters on chains where culture and social flows compound. Base is a case in point.

Base overtook Solana by NFT volume on some measures this year as cheap mints, Zora’s mass-mint cadence and Farcaster-adjacent funnels stacked up. The tilt explains why creators weighing where to drop are starting with distribution math, then back-solving into fee profiles.

Royalties no longer anchor the revenue stack.

Creator fees collapsed from 2022 peaks after marketplace wars made royalties optional across much of the market. According to Nansen, royalty receipts hit two-year lows in 2023 and did not recover to prior levels.

The counter-trend is the rise of enforcement-aligned venues. Magic Eden and Yuga Labs launched an Ethereum marketplace in late 2023 that enforces creator royalties, building a protected lane for brands that can command it.

The equilibrium is a bifurcated market, with low take-rates and primary sales, IP deals and retail tie-ins carrying most creator margins, while walled gardens capture premium drops where enforcement is contractual.

Marketplace share remains fluid where incentives drive order flow. On Solana, Magic Eden and Tensor trade leadership in a duopoly that swings with rewards schedules and program design, often ranging between roughly 40 and 60 percent share for each across periods.

This is less a structural change than a function of incentive epochs, which can make share charts look like a regime shift that later mean-reverts. The takeaway for creators is to negotiate distribution as part of launch planning rather than defaulting to a single venue.

Where users actually went tells the near-term roadmap.

Sports, tickets and loyalty programs are scaling because the benefits are schedulable and recurring, and the on-chain primitive, token-gated access, is already embedded in existing ticketing and e-commerce flows.

DappRadar’s Q3 breakouts show sports volumes outpacing the market, and that is before full-season or league-wide programs land.

Gaming is compounding more quietly. Immutable’s zkEVM stack and live metrics show steady transaction growth and a security-on-ETH, UX-on-L2 design that aligns with asset custody and recurring secondary fees, according to Messari.

IP and licensing is the other bridge from JPEGs to consumer channels. Pudgy Penguins’ expansion into more than 3,000 Walmart stores created a live pipeline from NFTs to physical retail and licensing cashflows,.

For creators deciding where to ship next, cost and UX by chain are now legible. ETH L1 still holds provenance and high-value art, with variable gas and optional royalties in most venues.

ETH L2s offer cents-level fees after Dencun, plus sponsored or gasless flows and social funnels on Base and Farcaster.

Solana’s compression brings millions of mints into dollar-level budgets with mobile-first wallet reach. Bitcoin inscriptions line up with scarce collectibles, where fee spikes are a feature, not a bug. The table below summarizes the current journey from mint to trade.

StepETH L1ETH L2 (e.g., Base)SolanaBitcoin inscriptions
MintVariable gas under congestionCents to sub-cents after EIP-4844, apps can sponsorSub-penny typical, compression enables mass mintsTied to block fees and inscription size
List/TradeGas plus optional royalties in most venuesCheap execution, social funnels on Base and FramesCheap execution, high throughput, strong mobile UXFees rise with demand, suited to scarce collectibles
NotesHigh-value art and provenanceCulture and social distribution, gasless UX possible~7.7 SOL for 10M compressed slots, median fee ~ $0.003Collector beta relative to fee cycles

The macro mix is changing as well.

A $5–6.5 billion annualized run-rate in 2025, with average sale values in the $80–$100 range in the first half, sets the base from which next year’s scenarios extend.

Using CryptoSlam monthly sales as the spine and DappRadar category splits for color, a bear case lands at $4–5 billion GMV if crypto beta stalls and average sale values compress, with fee-sensitive use cases concentrated on Solana and ETH L2s, ETH L1 art steady, and inscriptions tracking Bitcoin fee cycles.

A base case in the $6–9 billion band requires embedded wallets and social mint rails to keep expanding, plus sports and live events scaling across seasons and brands testing royalty-enforced venues for new drops.

The bull case at $10–14 billion would need a step-change in mobile distribution, with Base and passkeys normalizing mint flows, Phantom monthly actives trending above 20 million, ticketing pilots moving into mainstream programs and gaming assets recurring.

In all three bands the share mix tilts toward ETH L2 and Solana, with ETH L1 narrower and Bitcoin stable as a collectibles lane.

Six toggles will decide how quickly that flow materializes.

  1. Wallet UX and distribution will be the lead indicator, measured by passkey adoption, sponsored fees and MAUs for Phantom and Coinbase Smart Wallet.
  2. The footprint of royalty enforcement matters for premium drops, including any OpenSea policy pivots and the health of creator-allied markets on Ethereum.
  3. Sports and ticketing partners that move from pilots to season-long programs convert one-off GMV into schedules.
  4. Base and Zora cadence, visible in monthly mints and Base’s share of NFT GMV alongside Farcaster Frames, shows whether social funnels sustain.
  5. Solana compression adoption, tracked by compressed mint counts and costs per million assets, signals whether loyalty and media programs go from experiments to defaults.
  6. Bitcoin fee cycles, and their link to inscriptions and Runes, will keep shaping collectibles pricing as mempool congestion ebbs and flows.

Two risks remain constant. Wash trading and spam minting still distort GMV and sales counts, which is why looking at average sale values and organic-filtered dashboards is the safer approach.

Marketplace incentives can make share charts look like regime change when they are just airdrop cycles, especially on Solana’s duopoly, so launch plans should price that churn in from the outset. The other operational constraint is revenue design.

With royalties mostly optional in open markets, primary sales, IP licensing and retail are carrying more of the load, while enforced venues create a premium lane that some brands can utilize and most cannot.

What looked like an end state in 2023 turned into a migration.

The JPEG boom is over, the rails got cheaper, the use cases now line up with tickets, sports, gaming and IP, and the wallet and distribution stack is starting to meet users where they already are.

The Blue Chip flagship NFT, Bored Ape Yacht Club remains in a perilous state for those who invested six figures into AWS hosted jpegs. The NFT below sold for over 74 ETH in 2021 but is now worth just 9 ETH, an 87 percent decline in three years.

Bored Ape Yacht Club NFTs (Source: OpenSea)

Speculation may be over for the non-fungible sector, but will this finally allow the underlying technology to gain traction in real world utility applications? Only time will tell, but the signs are promising, just not for the bag holders.

Q3 closed with $1.58 billion in trades and 18.1 million sales, and the mix is already moving in that direction.

Mentioned in this article

Source: https://cryptoslate.com/nfts-are-coming-back-but-blue-chip-projects-are-on-life-support/

Market Opportunity
Bluefin Logo
Bluefin Price(BLUE)
$0.02051
$0.02051$0.02051
-1.67%
USD
Bluefin (BLUE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies

U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies

The post U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The United States is contending with the intricacies of cryptocurrency regulation as newly enacted legislation stirs debate over centralized versus decentralized finance. The recent passage of the GENIUS Act under Bo Hines’ leadership is perceived to skew favor towards centralized entities, potentially disadvantaging decentralized innovations. Continue Reading:U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies Source: https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/u-s-moves-grip-on-crypto-regulation-intensifies
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:09
The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Why your phone number shows as private and how to remove it

Why your phone number shows as private and how to remove it

Table of contents How to remove private number on your Android How to remove private number on your iPhone (iOS) What to do if your number still shows as Private
Share
Techcabal2026/02/07 00:23