Oracle vs. Salesforce: Which Tech Giant Is The Better Buy?

The post Oracle vs. Salesforce: Which Tech Giant Is The Better Buy? appeared first on 24/7 Wall St..

Salesforce (NYSE: CRM) and Oracle (NYSE: ORCL) both delivered fresh earnings inside a three week window, and the contrast is striking.

Salesforce sells AI agents that sit on top of customer data. Oracle sells the cloud plumbing those agents increasingly run on. Both are leaning into generative AI, but the way each one funds, prices, and books that growth tells two very different stories about where enterprise software dollars are flowing.

Agentforce Carries Salesforce. Cloud Infrastructure Carries Oracle.

Salesforce posted Q1 FY27 revenue of $11.133 billion, up 13.27%, with EPS of $3.88 against a $3.1271 estimate. The real headline is Agentforce ARR at $1.2 billion, up 205%, with 3.8 billion Agentic Work Units delivered.

CEO Marc Benioff called it “an outstanding quarter for Salesforce, record revenue, record deals, and cash flow.” Over 50% of Agentforce bookings came from existing customers, which is reassuring but also raises a fair question about new logo velocity.

Oracle’s Q4 FY26 told a wilder story. Revenue hit $19.184 billion with cloud infrastructure surging 93% to $5.787 billion. Remaining performance obligations exploded to $638 billion, up 363%, with $75 billion tied to prepaid or customer supplied GPU arrangements.

That cushions Oracle’s capital risk, but capex still ran to $55.663 billion on a trailing basis, dragging free cash flow to negative $23.686 billion.

Capital Light vs. Capital Heavy

Salesforce funded a $25 billion accelerated share repurchase by issuing debt, taking noncurrent debt to $39.3 billion from $10.4 billion.

Oracle plans to raise roughly $40 billion in FY27 through debt and equity to keep building. Co-CEO Clay Magouyrk framed the strategy plainly, saying Oracle has “over 211 live and planned regions worldwide, more than any of our cloud competitors.”

The Next Test Is Whether AI Bookings Convert to Cash

I want to see Agentforce monetization broaden beyond the installed base, and I will be watching whether Slack MCP, which crossed 1 million active users in six weeks, becomes a paid hook.

For Oracle, the question is how quickly that $638 billion RPO turns into recognized revenue without further blowing out capex. The Q1 FY27 cloud growth guide of 58% to 64% is the proof point.

Sentiment is telling, too. Reddit chatter on Oracle stayed bullish post-earnings, with sentiment scores 67 to 78. Salesforce drew the opposite reaction, with scores collapsing to 12 to 33 by June 11.

Why I Lean Toward Salesforce on Valuation, but Respect Oracle’s Backlog

Personally, I find the setup awkward for both. Salesforce trades near a 12x forward P/E with a 38.64% year to date drawdown, which is unusual for a profitable software leader. For value-oriented investors who trust the Agentforce ramp, that valuation stands out.

Oracle is the bolder bet. The 450.97% ten year return and that backlog suggest real demand, but the FY27 capital raise and negative free cash flow mean you are underwriting Larry Ellison’s AI thesis with a heavier balance sheet.

On valuation alone, Salesforce screens cheaper, while Oracle’s backlog underwrites the growth case; one clean quarter of free cash flow improvement at Oracle would meaningfully de-risk the thesis.

The post Oracle vs. Salesforce: Which Tech Giant Is The Better Buy? appeared first on 24/7 Wall St..