Nature, at least, has been consistent. It is Iligan’s officials who seem to be persisting in demonstrating that consistency need not be learned.Nature, at least, has been consistent. It is Iligan’s officials who seem to be persisting in demonstrating that consistency need not be learned.

[Pastilan] The cost of neglect in Iligan

2026/02/09 15:29
4분 읽기

Late last week, Iligan City once again learned what it means to be governed by inattention.

Tropical Storm Basyang (Penha), DXIC-Radio Mindanao Network reported, left at least five people dead and displaced over 6,000 families – roughly 24,000 human beings – as it turned 27 barangays into virtual swamps. That’s more than half the city. 

Iligan was paralyzed. Streets are clogged with mud and debris, traffic has ground to a near standstill, and the local government has launched 24-hour road-clearing operations to try to restore order.

DXIC said at least 72 houses were destroyed, 152 damaged, and over 300 more were submerged. Naturally, evacuation centers overflowed, while emergency teams scrambled like understudies in a tragicomedy scripted years ago.

Then came the expected government rituals. City hall declared a state of calamity, unlocking reserved funds. The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) followed, imposing a 60-day price freeze on essentials. Citizens were urged to report overpricing and hoarding. And all the while, the performance of the government carried on as if responding were the same as preventing.

Iligan should have known better. In 2011, Tropical Storm Sendong (Washi) tore through Iligan and its neighbor, Cagayan de Oro, killing, displacing, and exposing structural weaknesses. It has been repeated in February 2026. Sendong should have been a hard lesson; instead, it became just a bad memory, and not a guide to action. Nearly 15 years later, Basyang arrived not as a surprise, but as proof that the city’s officials chose to forget.

Perhaps it is time for Iliganons to scrutinize, with unflinching eyes, every flood control project supposedly built since Sendong in 2011. The records of every public works official, congressman, and mayor who has held office since must be examined.

Two mayors have presided over the city in this span – Celso Regencia and now Frederick Siao, who traded places in the 2022 elections. Lawrence Cruz, who was mayor when Sendong struck, and former congressman Varf Belmonte should also be asked, bluntly and publicly, what they did in the immediate aftermath of that disaster – or whether inaction was always their default policy.

Let’s drop the comforting talk of fate. Last week’s flooding was not divine whimsy, but a predictable, entirely preventable result of human neglect and bureaucratic incompetence. Nature did what nature does. People failed to act.

Cagayan de Oro faced the same storm – heavy rain and strong winds – but did not suffer the same degree of devastation. The difference may lie in foresight: after Sendong, it appears the government moved fast to build a JICA-funded “mega dike” along the Cagayan River, a structure stretching several kilometers that likely saved riverside areas from the worst.

In 2011, the same river mercilessly overflowed and flattened communities in Cagayan de Oro. At least, the semblance of planning, investment, engineering, and collaboration may have spelled a difference, so it seems. In Iligan, by contrast, negligence seems to have been the only architect at work.

Rivers exist to carry water away, yet in Iligan they have reportedly been narrowed, choked, and constrained, while the areas they drain have grown recklessly. These bottlenecks are dangerous traps that could turn even an ordinary rainfall into catastrophe. On February 6, the Tubod and Mandulog Rivers did what physics demands: they became swollen and overflowed in the worst-hit areas.

Urban planners are not ignorant. They know what must be done: widen the channels, dredge the silt, move families out of harm’s way, and remove illegal encroachments. What appears to be missing in Iligan is the will to spend on prevention rather than propaganda, the will to choose substance over spectacle. Yet we are told that concrete adorned the city where water should have flowed, and public funds were allegedly spent on cosmetic projects to the delight of the cameras and contractors. And the rivers? They remained clogged. 

Let’s cut to the chase: Sendong was the warning, and Basyang should be enough to drive the lesson home. Rivers overflow not because they are whimsical but because humans make them incapable of doing their job. And so, they will swell and spill every single time.

Until Iligan treats its rivers as systems to be managed and public funds as a trust rather than an opportunity for vanity, destructive floods will return. And it’s not because the rain is extraordinary, but because negligence is habitual, celebrated even, in the corridors of power.

Nature, at least, has been consistent. It is Iligan’s officials who seem to be persisting in demonstrating that consistency need not be learned. Pastilan. – Rappler.com

시장 기회
Notcoin 로고
Notcoin 가격(NOT)
$0,0003911
$0,0003911$0,0003911
-2,85%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) 실시간 가격 차트
면책 조항: 본 사이트에 재게시된 글들은 공개 플랫폼에서 가져온 것으로 정보 제공 목적으로만 제공됩니다. 이는 반드시 MEXC의 견해를 반영하는 것은 아닙니다. 모든 권리는 원저자에게 있습니다. 제3자의 권리를 침해하는 콘텐츠가 있다고 판단될 경우, service@support.mexc.com으로 연락하여 삭제 요청을 해주시기 바랍니다. MEXC는 콘텐츠의 정확성, 완전성 또는 시의적절성에 대해 어떠한 보증도 하지 않으며, 제공된 정보에 기반하여 취해진 어떠한 조치에 대해서도 책임을 지지 않습니다. 본 콘텐츠는 금융, 법률 또는 기타 전문적인 조언을 구성하지 않으며, MEXC의 추천이나 보증으로 간주되어서는 안 됩니다.

추천 콘텐츠

Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Ethereum founder, Vitalik Buterin, has unveiled new goals for the Ethereum blockchain today at the Japan Developer Conference. The plan lays out short-term, mid-term, and long-term goals touching on L2 interoperability and faster responsiveness among others. In terms of technology, he said again that he is sure that Layer 2 options are the best way […]
공유하기
Cryptopolitan2025/09/18 01:15
White House meeting could unfreeze the crypto CLARITY Act this week, but crypto rewards likely to be the price

White House meeting could unfreeze the crypto CLARITY Act this week, but crypto rewards likely to be the price

White House stablecoin meeting could unfreeze the CLARITY Act, but your USDC rewards may be the price The newly confirmed Feb. 10 White House meeting on stablecoin
공유하기
CryptoSlate2026/02/09 18:48
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
공유하기
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28