Uncovering the truth behind South Korea’s stablecoin policy

2025/08/11 19:00

Author: MORBID-19

Compiled by: TechFlow

It’s all so obvious in hindsight!

It’s me again, complaining about the Korean won stablecoin.

But today I finally figured out why our "controllers" are so keen on promoting stablecoins.

I think I've discovered their real motive behind all this!

Let’s first look at the Financial Times report:

Ahn Do-geol, formerly the Second Vice Minister of Economy and Finance, recently formed a working group with the Ministry of Strategy and Finance, the Bank of Korea, the Financial Services Commission, the Korea Capital Market Institute, and other relevant agencies to draft a bill on won-denominated stablecoins.

Andojie's office plans to include in the bill not only the basic qualifications and licensing requirements for stablecoin issuers, but also provisions regarding collateral asset requirements, monetary policy management measures, foreign exchange transaction supervision, and user protection mechanisms.

Hwang Se-woon, a senior researcher at the Korea Capital Market Institute and a member of the Ahn Do-je’s task force on the Korean won stablecoin, stressed that only entities that meet strict eligibility criteria should be allowed to issue stablecoins, and that the qualifications of issuers should be granted through a licensing system.

TLDR: Issuing a Korean won stablecoin will likely require government approval

So who is most likely to secure government approval? Someone close to the government, perhaps? Or perhaps established businesses that have already hinted they are preparing for it?

No one really knows yet who the ultimate winners will be from this hasty policy, but the market seems to have already bet very aggressively on certain names.

KakaoPay is one of the obvious candidates as a potential beneficiary of a won-based stablecoin, as it is one of the largest payment apps in South Korea.

With KakaoPay at the forefront, Kakao Group is planning to deploy its own bank, KakaoBank, to further advance its stablecoin dream.

It seems that South Korea’s crypto players are about to “eat their fill” again, and the “invisible hand” seems to be working silently.

But is this hand truly invisible, or is it actually “visible” to some people?

Thanks to 4K cameras, the "invisible hand" becomes clearly visible

Expose elected officials who claim they own no securities but may be engaging in insider trading.

 Photo: Lee Chun-seok, a member of the Democratic Party of South Korea, traded stocks in the name of another person in the National Assembly.

Lee Chun-seok, a member of the Democratic Party of South Korea, was photographed trading stocks, including Naver shares, using a mobile phone securities trading app during the plenary session of the National Assembly. The problem is that the account name in the photo was not "Lee Chun-seok," but his assistant, Mr. Cha.

(…)

Despite two similar photos taken within the past 10 months, Councilman Lee's asset disclosure statement indicated that neither he nor his family members held any stocks or securities as of December 31st of last year. Under the Financial Transaction Real-Name System Act, all financial transactions must be conducted under one's real name. Anyone found guilty of using another person's name for illegal purposes, such as concealing assets, may face up to five years in prison or a fine of up to 50 million won.

—Excerpt from The Joongang

This classic "I don't care about the 125x zoom camera on the back, let me see how these stocks perform and vote for them" really left me speechless.

Although it is still unclear whether he was actually involved in insider trading, the mere fact that he used his assistant's account to trade already exudes the whiff of a crime.

When it comes to crime, a lot of things are being done under the guise of “educational content.”

Original video link: Click here

At the 17:06 mark of the aforementioned video, the narrator claims that K-Pop and Korean culture could be a good use case for a Korean won stablecoin, repeating the arguments of politicians who have attempted to push for related legislation.

However, what’s truly shocking about this video isn’t the content itself, but the sheer amount of disappointment viewers express towards the channel owner when you check out the comments section:

  • "What's wrong with you? Are you trying to run for election?"
  • "It seems I've always overestimated Hyoseok..."
  • "What's going on? Did the government threaten you to post this video? Haha... Yeah."

However, seeing the voices expressing dissatisfaction with this attempt at "brainwashing" in the comment section made me feel a little scared, because I suddenly realized that those who raised questions may only be an absolute minority in this country.

Most people don’t even care what stablecoins are or how they work. Only those with a certain level of financial knowledge are able to pay attention to and solve these problems.

The current government's approval rating is a whopping 65%. Of course, this has absolutely nothing to do with that free $100 voucher!

As long as they keep throwing money around, maybe they can eventually achieve their goals.

We will all succeed.

Clause de non-responsabilité : les articles republiés sur ce site proviennent de plateformes publiques et sont fournis à titre informatif uniquement. Ils ne reflètent pas nécessairement les opinions de MEXC. Tous les droits restent la propriété des auteurs d’origine. Si vous estimez qu'un contenu porte atteinte aux droits d'un tiers, veuillez contacter service@support.mexc.com pour demander sa suppression. MEXC ne garantit ni l'exactitude, ni l'exhaustivité, ni l'actualité des contenus, et décline toute responsabilité quant aux actions entreprises sur la base des informations fournies. Ces contenus ne constituent pas des conseils financiers, juridiques ou professionnels, et ne doivent pas être interprétés comme une recommandation ou une approbation de la part de MEXC.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Telegram Shuts Down Huione’s Largest Crypto Scam Market Ever, But Rivals Take Over with 400% Volume Surge

Telegram Shuts Down Huione’s Largest Crypto Scam Market Ever, But Rivals Take Over with 400% Volume Surge

Telegram shutting down Huione Guarantee, the largest illicit marketplace in history, with over $27 billion in transactions, paradoxically strengthened the dark market as rival platforms experienced a 400% volume surge and quickly absorbed the criminal user base. Following blockchain analytics firm Elliptic’s investigation, Telegram banned thousands of channels and accounts linked to Huione on May 13, 2025. However, the successor platform, Tudou Guarantee, immediately captured the displaced criminal activity, processing equal volumes within weeks of the shutdown. 🚨 Telegram dark markets expand to fill the gap left by Huione Guarantee In May, Telegram shut down Huione Guarantee — the largest dark market to have ever existed, responsible for more than $27 billion in USDT transactions — following research from Elliptic. Elliptic’s… pic.twitter.com/ZY2m1ju3i0 — Elliptic (@elliptic) June 23, 2025 Elliptic tracked over 30 highly active guarantee marketplaces in Southeast Asia that continue to facilitate money laundering, stolen data trading, and “pig butchering” scam infrastructure. The Hydra Effect: How Huione Multiply Under Pressure The $27 billion Huione marketplace had operated as a sophisticated criminal ecosystem, offering everything from fake documents and stolen personal data to money laundering services and intimidation-for-hire through Telegram’s encrypted infrastructure. The platform’s reach extended far beyond simple financial crime, with ties to human trafficking operations disguised as legitimate IT companies across Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar, where victims were forced to execute romance scams and crypto fraud under constant surveillance. Huione has been connected to Cambodia’s ruling elite and its role in laundering proceeds for North Korea’s Lazarus Group. This made it a primary target for the U.S. Treasury’s FinCEN , which designated the entire Huione Group as a money laundering concern in May 2025. The criminal enterprise strategically acquired a 30% stake in Tudou Guarantee in December 2024, effectively ensuring operational continuity before enforcement action materialized. Source: Elliptic This planning enabled the seamless migration of hundreds of thousands of users. Tudou’s transaction volumes surged from negligible levels to over 300,000 by June 15. The same merchants who previously operated through Huione immediately established operations on Tudou , offering identical services, including stolen data, money laundering capabilities, and specialized tools for pig butchering scams targeting Western victims. Beyond Tudou’s dominance, multiple smaller platforms experienced exponential growth as the criminal ecosystem fragmented and diversified. According to Elliptic, Shuangying marketplace saw user numbers triple from 40,000 to 110,000 transactions, and Fully Light expanded from 20,000 to over 80,000 transactions. Source: Elliptic These platforms use Telegram’s encryption for communication and comprehensive business operations, including reputation management, order fulfillment, and dispute resolution among vendors and clients. They also use Tether’s USDT stablecoin as the primary medium of exchange, which provides these criminals with dollar-denominated stability while avoiding traditional banking systems. The UN estimates that Telegram-based criminal activity generates up to $36.5 billion annually through scams, money laundering, and stolen data sales. Ongoing Enforcement Challenges On Telegram’s Encrypted Crime Economy Despite Telegram’s cooperation in removing thousands of channels and banning associated accounts, Chainalysis research revealed that Huione’s core cryptocurrency processing infrastructure remained operational, which Elliptic also confirmed. Source: Elliptic The platform is simply migrating to new domains and quietly resuming Telegram’s presence within weeks of the apparent shutdown. This resilience stems from the platform’s complex architecture, which separates public-facing marketing infrastructure from core financial processing systems. This allows criminal operations to continue even when their most visible components face disruption. The enforcement action’s limited impact becomes particularly evident when examining the broader criminal ecosystem that Huione enabled, including forcing trafficking victims into crypto scam operations across Southeast Asian compounds where legitimate job seekers are lured with false IT positions before being held against their will and coerced into executing fraudulent schemes. 📰 A new United Nations report is calling out Telegram for affecting organized crime in Southeast Asia amid Pavel Durov's legal woes. #Telegram #PavelDurov #UN https://t.co/q0ZEMy6TIU — Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews) October 7, 2024 These physical operations, often disguised as customer service centers, create a hybrid criminal model that combines digital financial crime with traditional human trafficking, making comprehensive enforcement exponentially more complex as it requires coordination across multiple jurisdictions and crime categories. While Telegram has begun responding to pressure by removing certain features and updating content policies, the platform’s core encrypted messaging capabilities remain attractive to criminals who exploit the technology’s legitimate privacy protections to operate sophisticated marketplace ecosystems. The challenge for regulators lies in addressing criminal abuse without undermining the privacy rights and communication security that make encrypted platforms valuable for legitimate users worldwide. Telegram CEO Pavel Durov is also fighting this battle with the regulators. He was recently arrested and released on bail , but surveillance remains.
Partager
CryptoNews2025/06/24 16:48