PANews reported on November 6th that Wintermute published an article on its X platform stating: "Liquidity drives the cryptocurrency cycle, but inflows have now stalled. Since the beginning of 2024, the size of stablecoins, ETFs, and the digital asset treasury has increased from $180 billion to $560 billion, but the growth momentum has slowed. Funds are rotating internally rather than entering new markets, leading to a rapid fading of gains and a continued narrowing of market breadth. When any of these three inflow channels accelerates again, liquidity will flow back into the digital asset space. Until then, cryptocurrencies will remain in a self-funding phase."PANews reported on November 6th that Wintermute published an article on its X platform stating: "Liquidity drives the cryptocurrency cycle, but inflows have now stalled. Since the beginning of 2024, the size of stablecoins, ETFs, and the digital asset treasury has increased from $180 billion to $560 billion, but the growth momentum has slowed. Funds are rotating internally rather than entering new markets, leading to a rapid fading of gains and a continued narrowing of market breadth. When any of these three inflow channels accelerates again, liquidity will flow back into the digital asset space. Until then, cryptocurrencies will remain in a self-funding phase."

Wintermute: Liquidity drives cryptocurrency cycles, but inflows have now stopped.

2025/11/06 17:51

PANews reported on November 6th that Wintermute published an article on its X platform stating: "Liquidity drives the cryptocurrency cycle, but inflows have now stalled. Since the beginning of 2024, the size of stablecoins, ETFs, and the digital asset treasury has increased from $180 billion to $560 billion, but the growth momentum has slowed. Funds are rotating internally rather than entering new markets, leading to a rapid fading of gains and a continued narrowing of market breadth. When any of these three inflow channels accelerates again, liquidity will flow back into the digital asset space. Until then, cryptocurrencies will remain in a self-funding phase."

Aviso legal: Los artículos republicados en este sitio provienen de plataformas públicas y se ofrecen únicamente con fines informativos. No reflejan necesariamente la opinión de MEXC. Todos los derechos pertenecen a los autores originales. Si consideras que algún contenido infringe derechos de terceros, comunícate a la dirección service@support.mexc.com para solicitar su eliminación. MEXC no garantiza la exactitud, la integridad ni la actualidad del contenido y no se responsabiliza por acciones tomadas en función de la información proporcionada. El contenido no constituye asesoría financiera, legal ni profesional, ni debe interpretarse como recomendación o respaldo por parte de MEXC.

También te puede interesar

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Compartir
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26