Certainly! Here’s the rewritten article with an added introduction, optimized SEO, and improved readability, while maintaining the original HTML structure: Recent declines in the cryptocurrency market have prompted new discussions around the factors influencing Bitcoin and altcoin prices. Notably, the role of crypto treasury companies—institutions that acquire and hold large crypto holdings—has come into focus [...]Certainly! Here’s the rewritten article with an added introduction, optimized SEO, and improved readability, while maintaining the original HTML structure: Recent declines in the cryptocurrency market have prompted new discussions around the factors influencing Bitcoin and altcoin prices. Notably, the role of crypto treasury companies—institutions that acquire and hold large crypto holdings—has come into focus [...]

Crypto Treasury Firms at Play in Market Dip, Expert Warns

Crypto Treasury Firms At Play In Market Dip, Expert Warns

Certainly! Here’s the rewritten article with an added introduction, optimized SEO, and improved readability, while maintaining the original HTML structure:

Recent declines in the cryptocurrency market have prompted new discussions around the factors influencing Bitcoin and altcoin prices. Notably, the role of crypto treasury companies—institutions that acquire and hold large crypto holdings—has come into focus as a potential catalyst for market volatility. Experts highlight that these firms’ strategic moves and sometimes questionable motives may be influencing recent downturns, alongside macroeconomic tensions and regulatory concerns shaping the broader crypto landscape.

  • Crypto treasury companies have played a significant role in recent crypto market fluctuations, acting as a catalyst for downturns.
  • Many of these firms raised substantial funds, often through complex financing mechanisms, fueling market fears of forced asset sales.
  • The trend of corporate crypto holdings has surged in 2025, with hundreds of firms adopting Bitcoin and Ethereum as part of their treasuries.
  • Concerns persist over leveraged positions and potential market shocks stemming from these large treasury strategies.
  • Analysts suggest the industry may see consolidation among crypto treasuries and expansion into broader Web3 initiatives.

Conversations surrounding the recent decline in cryptocurrency prices increasingly point to the influence of crypto treasury firms, which have become prominent players amid the current market turbulence. Blockchain author and Columbia Business School adjunct professor Omid Malekan emphasizes that these entities’ activities are crucial to understanding the broader crypto downturn, arguing that digital asset treasuries (DATs) have effectively triggered a mass exodus from crypto holdings, thereby pushing prices downward.

“Any analysis of why crypto prices continue to fall needs to include DATs,” Malekan stated in a recent post on X. “In aggregate, they turned out to be a massive extraction and exit event — a major reason for the decline.” He also pointed out that only a handful of companies have truly focused on creating sustainable value in the space, with many treating crypto investments as quick gains rather than long-term propositions.

Companies in it for wrong reasons causing problem

Many firms entering the crypto treasury scene raised millions from investors eager for exposure to digital assets, often viewing the strategy as a quick path to profits. Malekan notes that launching such public entities is costly, involving substantial fees paid to bankers and legal professionals. “The money spent on these fees had to come from somewhere,” he explained.

Crypto treasury companies have been actively acquiring large sums of top cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin and Ethereum, often leveraging these purchases through share sales, convertible notes, and debt offerings. These high levels of leverage raise concerns that distressed firms might exacerbate market downturns by engaging in forced asset sell-offs, which could trigger a ripple effect across the broader crypto markets.

Some companies have also looked to generate yield through staking or plans to deploy holdings into DeFi protocols for lending and liquidity provision. Malekan criticizes such practices, stating, “The biggest damage DATs inflicted on the overall crypto market cap was providing a mass exit point for tokens that were thought to be locked away. Many investors failed to see the warning signs.” He further warns that excessive fundraising and token minting—even when aimed at ecosystem growth—can be detrimental, likening it to gangrene in the industry.

Crypto treasury trend explodes in 2025

The adoption of Bitcoin and Ethereum by corporate treasuries has surged this year. An October report from asset manager Bitwise revealed that 48 new companies added Bitcoin to their balance sheets, bringing the total to 207 firms holding over one million tokens valued at more than $101 billion. Similarly, Ethereum has been adopted by 70 companies, collectively holding around 6.14 million ETH worth over $20 billion, according to Strategic ETH Reserve data.

Industry analysts predict that as the crypto treasury movement matures, these holdings are likely to consolidate under a few major players. Others believe the trend will expand into broader areas of Web3, including decentralized finance (DeFi) and NFT ecosystems, shaping the future of crypto corporate strategies.

Overall, the role of crypto treasuries in market dynamics remains a critical point of discussion, highlighting both potential growth avenues and systemic risks within the evolving landscape of cryptocurrency and blockchain adoption.

This article was originally published as Crypto Treasury Firms at Play in Market Dip, Expert Warns on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Aviso legal: Los artículos republicados en este sitio provienen de plataformas públicas y se ofrecen únicamente con fines informativos. No reflejan necesariamente la opinión de MEXC. Todos los derechos pertenecen a los autores originales. Si consideras que algún contenido infringe derechos de terceros, comunícate a la dirección service@support.mexc.com para solicitar su eliminación. MEXC no garantiza la exactitud, la integridad ni la actualidad del contenido y no se responsabiliza por acciones tomadas en función de la información proporcionada. El contenido no constituye asesoría financiera, legal ni profesional, ni debe interpretarse como recomendación o respaldo por parte de MEXC.
Compartir perspectivas

También te puede interesar

While the global market is rising, cryptocurrencies are falling. What exactly is the problem?

While the global market is rising, cryptocurrencies are falling. What exactly is the problem?

Author: Jasper De Maere , OTC Strategist at Wintertermute Compiled by: Tim, PANews The macroeconomic environment remains supportive, with positive events such as interest rate cuts, the end of quantitative tightening, and stock indices nearing high levels occurring one after another. However, the crypto market continues to lag behind as post-Federal Reserve policy meeting liquidity is waning. Global liquidity continues to expand, but funds are not flowing into the crypto market. ETF inflows have stagnated, decentralized AI activity has dried up, and only stablecoins are maintaining growth. Leverage has been cleared, and the market structure appears healthy, but a rebound in ETF or DAT funds would be the key signal for a liquidity recovery and the start of a potential catch-up rally. Macroeconomic Status Quo Last week, the market experienced volatility due to the Federal Reserve's rate cut, the FOMC meeting minutes, and earnings reports from several US technology companies. We saw the expected 25 basis point rate cut, officially concluding quantitative tightening, and the earnings of the "Big Seven" US stocks were generally positive. However, market volatility occurred after Powell downplayed the near certainty of another rate cut in December. The probability of a rate cut, which had been priced in by the market before the meeting (95%), has now fallen to 68%, prompting traders to reassess their strategies and triggering a rapid shift towards risk aversion. This sell-off didn't seem driven by panic, but rather resembled position adjustments. Some investors had over-bet on a rise before the event, creating a classic "sell the news" situation, as the market had already fully priced in the 25 basis point rate cut. The stock market subsequently stabilized quickly, but the cryptocurrency market did not see a synchronized rebound. Since then, BTC and ETH have been trading sideways, hovering around $107,000 and $3,700 respectively as of this writing. Altcoins have also exhibited a volatile pattern, with their excess gains primarily driven by short-term narratives. Compared to other asset classes, cryptocurrencies are the worst-performing asset class. From an index perspective, crypto assets in a broad sense experienced a significant sell-off last week, with the GMCI-30 index falling 12%. Most sectors closed lower. The gaming sector plummeted 21%. Layer 2 network sector plunges 19% The meme coin sector declined by 18%. Mid-cap and small-cap tokens fell by approximately 15%-16%. Only the AI (-3%) and DePIN (-4%) sectors showed relative resilience, mainly due to the strong performance of TAO tokens and AI proxy concept coins in the early part of last week. Overall, this volatility seems more like a money-driven phenomenon, consistent with the tightening liquidity following the Fed's decision, rather than caused by fundamental factors. So why are cryptocurrencies lagging behind while global risk assets are rising? In short: liquidity. But it's not a lack of liquidity, but rather a problem of where it flows. Global liquidity is clearly expanding. Central banks are intervening in relatively strong rather than weak markets, a situation that has only occurred a few times in the past, usually followed by a strong surge in risk appetite. The problem is that this new liquidity is not flowing into the crypto market as it has in the past. Stablecoin supply continues to climb steadily (up 50% year-to-date, adding $100 billion), but Bitcoin ETF inflows have stagnated since the summer, with assets under management hovering around $150 billion. The once-booming crypto treasury DAT has fallen silent, and related concept stocks listed on exchanges like Nasdaq have seen a significant drop in trading volume. Of the three major funding engines driving the market in the first half of this year, only stablecoins are still playing a role. ETF funding has peaked, DAT activity has dried up, and although overall liquidity remains ample, the share flowing into the crypto market has shrunk significantly. In other words, the tap for funds hasn't been turned off; it's just that the funds have flowed elsewhere. The novelty of ETFs has worn off, allocation ratios have become more normalized, and retail investors' funds have flowed elsewhere, turning to chase the trends in stocks, artificial intelligence, and prediction markets. Our Viewpoint The stock market performance proves that the market environment remains strong; liquidity has simply not yet been transmitted to the crypto market. Although the market is still digesting the 10/11 liquidation, the overall structure remains robust—leverage has been cleared, volatility is under control, and the macroeconomic environment is supportive. Bitcoin continues to act as a market anchor thanks to stable ETF inflows and tight exchange supply, while Ethereum and some L1 and L2 tokens have begun to show signs of relative strength. While a growing number of voices on crypto social media are attributing the price weakness to the four-year cycle theory, this concept is no longer truly applicable. In mature markets, the miner supply and halving mechanisms that once drove cycles have long since failed; the core factor truly determining price performance is now liquidity. The macroeconomic environment continues to provide strong support—the interest rate cut cycle has begun, quantitative tightening has ended, and the stock market is frequently hitting new highs—but the crypto market has lagged behind, primarily due to the lack of effective liquidity inflows. Compared to the three major drivers of capital inflows last year and in the first half of this year (ETFs, stablecoins, and DeFi yield assets), only stablecoins are currently showing a healthy trend. Close monitoring of ETF inflows and DAT activity will be key indicators, as these are likely to be the earliest signals of liquidity returning to the crypto market.
Compartir
PANews2025/11/05 16:50