The post Why The ALDS Battle Between New York And Toronto Isn’t Over Yet appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TORONTO, ONTARIO – OCTOBER 05: Aaron Judge #99 of the New York Yankees tosses his bat during the ninth inning in game two of the American League Division Series against the Toronto Blue Jays at Rogers Centre on October 05, 2025 in Toronto, Ontario. (Photo by Vaughn Ridley/Getty Images) Getty Images The highly anticipated American League Division Series between the Toronto Blue Jays and New York Yankees has done anything but live up to expectations. Despite these two teams finishing the regular season with the same overall record, and the Blue Jays only winning the season series over the Yankees by three games, Toronto has established a commanding lead in the five-game series. After the first two games, the Blue Jays have outscored the Yankees 23-8, with the run differential being 22-1 in the first 14 innings of the series. Now, they enter New York only needing to win one of the next three games to reach their first American League Championship Series since 2016. While that all may make it sound like the remaining games are a formality, crazier things have happened in the playoffs. So, why might the Yankees be able to breathe life back into the ALDS and their season overall? The first trend is on the mound. In games three and four, the Yankees will be starting Carlos Rodon and Cam Schlittler. The two starters pitched in the Wild Card round against the Boston Red Sox. In that series, Rodon went 6 innings, allowing 3 earned runs, 4 hits, 3 walks, and struck out 6 batters. Rodon did not get the winning decision, but his six innings were enough for the bullpen to force a winner-take-all Game Three. In that game, the rookie Schlitter shined in his postseason debut, going 8 scoreless innings with 12 strikeouts… The post Why The ALDS Battle Between New York And Toronto Isn’t Over Yet appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TORONTO, ONTARIO – OCTOBER 05: Aaron Judge #99 of the New York Yankees tosses his bat during the ninth inning in game two of the American League Division Series against the Toronto Blue Jays at Rogers Centre on October 05, 2025 in Toronto, Ontario. (Photo by Vaughn Ridley/Getty Images) Getty Images The highly anticipated American League Division Series between the Toronto Blue Jays and New York Yankees has done anything but live up to expectations. Despite these two teams finishing the regular season with the same overall record, and the Blue Jays only winning the season series over the Yankees by three games, Toronto has established a commanding lead in the five-game series. After the first two games, the Blue Jays have outscored the Yankees 23-8, with the run differential being 22-1 in the first 14 innings of the series. Now, they enter New York only needing to win one of the next three games to reach their first American League Championship Series since 2016. While that all may make it sound like the remaining games are a formality, crazier things have happened in the playoffs. So, why might the Yankees be able to breathe life back into the ALDS and their season overall? The first trend is on the mound. In games three and four, the Yankees will be starting Carlos Rodon and Cam Schlittler. The two starters pitched in the Wild Card round against the Boston Red Sox. In that series, Rodon went 6 innings, allowing 3 earned runs, 4 hits, 3 walks, and struck out 6 batters. Rodon did not get the winning decision, but his six innings were enough for the bullpen to force a winner-take-all Game Three. In that game, the rookie Schlitter shined in his postseason debut, going 8 scoreless innings with 12 strikeouts…

Why The ALDS Battle Between New York And Toronto Isn’t Over Yet

2025/10/08 01:33

TORONTO, ONTARIO – OCTOBER 05: Aaron Judge #99 of the New York Yankees tosses his bat during the ninth inning in game two of the American League Division Series against the Toronto Blue Jays at Rogers Centre on October 05, 2025 in Toronto, Ontario. (Photo by Vaughn Ridley/Getty Images)

Getty Images

The highly anticipated American League Division Series between the Toronto Blue Jays and New York Yankees has done anything but live up to expectations.

Despite these two teams finishing the regular season with the same overall record, and the Blue Jays only winning the season series over the Yankees by three games, Toronto has established a commanding lead in the five-game series.

After the first two games, the Blue Jays have outscored the Yankees 23-8, with the run differential being 22-1 in the first 14 innings of the series.

Now, they enter New York only needing to win one of the next three games to reach their first American League Championship Series since 2016.

While that all may make it sound like the remaining games are a formality, crazier things have happened in the playoffs.

So, why might the Yankees be able to breathe life back into the ALDS and their season overall?

The first trend is on the mound. In games three and four, the Yankees will be starting Carlos Rodon and Cam Schlittler.

The two starters pitched in the Wild Card round against the Boston Red Sox. In that series, Rodon went 6 innings, allowing 3 earned runs, 4 hits, 3 walks, and struck out 6 batters.

Rodon did not get the winning decision, but his six innings were enough for the bullpen to force a winner-take-all Game Three.

In that game, the rookie Schlitter shined in his postseason debut, going 8 scoreless innings with 12 strikeouts and zero walks.

A 12-strikeout performance will be difficult to replicate against the Blue Jays, who were the second-best team in baseball at limiting strikeouts. However, the Yankees are desperate for similar production from their next two starters.

And, based on their pitch arsenals, they may be better suited for the task of the Blue Jays.

TORONTO, ONTARIO – OCTOBER 05: Vladimir Guerrero Jr. #27 of the Toronto Blue Jays celebrates after a grand slam during the fourth inning in game two of the American League Division Series against the New York Yankees at Rogers Centre on October 05, 2025 in Toronto, Ontario. (Photo by Mark Blinch/Getty Images)

Getty Images

This regular season, the Blue Jays limited the strikeout by also having the best team batting average in baseball, nearly .020 percentage points above the league average.

This is not by accident, as Toronto made a conscious decision to go away from the “three-true outcome” approach of modern baseball teams.

With players like Vladimir Guerrero Jr and George Springer, who slugged a combined 55 homers, they pose a threat offensively to do more than hit for contact.

However, the depth of the lineup all share the ability to put the ball in play and force the defense to make a play.

This strategy not only led them to the #1 seed in the American League postseason, but it also directly led to the biggest difference in terms of their overall record compared to their Pythagorean W-L record.

Based on their runs for vs runs against, the Blue Jays should have been an 88-74 team. However, with this relentless lineup, they posted a 27-20 record in one-score games, with several come-from-behind victories.

While the first two games were not close against New York, it was because of an offensive blitz from the lineup against Yankees starters Luis Gil and Max Fried.

Not much was expected from Gil in Game One, as due to injury, Gil had only pitched 57 innings coming into the postseason.

In that limited time, Gil has been a different pitcher, averaging just 6.5 strikeouts per nine innings compared to his career average of 10.4.

Fried, on the other hand, has been all that the Yankees could have asked for entering the playoffs.

The Yankee ace has never been a prolific strikeout pitcher, averaging 8.8 strikeouts per nine in his career.

Instead, Fried is one of the most efficient starters in baseball, with a league-leading five complete games since 2021.

Fried does so by inducing soft contact, with an average exit velocity of 87.2 miles per hour.

For most teams, this would be an issue. But for Toronto, this played right into their strong suit.

Of the 18 batters Fried faced, 10 reached base on 8 hits and 2 walks. Fried attempted to extend the zone more than he typically does, with just 32 strikes to his 51 pitches thrown.

This is where Rodon and Schlittler can cause a different result than Gil and Fried were able to.

While the Blue Jays are unlikely to strike out as much as the Red Sox did last series, the fact that Rodon and Schlittler have more effective put-away pitches will make the Blue Jays’ contact tool more difficult to execute.

Since these teams are divisional foes, Toronto does have experience against their next two starters. In two starts, Rodon has a 3.60 ERA against the Blue Jays, and Schlittler has an 8.10 ERA (his worst against any team).

NEW YORK, NEW YORK – OCTOBER 02: Cam Schlittler #31 of the New York Yankees celebrates during the fifth inning against the Boston Red Sox in game three of the American League Wild Card Series at Yankee Stadium on October 02, 2025 in the Bronx borough of New York City. (Photo by Ishika Samant/Getty Images)

Getty Images

However, based on these metrics, the results should favor New York’s pitching staff as the sample size increases.

This sense of familiarity will not be on the Yankees’ side offensively for Game Three, as Shane Bieber will get the start.

The former Cy Young winner joined the Blue Jays at the trade deadline, and only pitched 40.1 innings before the playoffs.

While Bieber has adjusted his pitch arsenal, dropping his slider usage to 20.3% compared to an average of 25-30% in his prime, he still brings what he was known for in Cleveland: a five-pitch mix.

Those five pitches Bieber offers have stifled the Yankees veterans who have faced Bieber, as Aaron Judge, Anthony Volpe, Cody Bellinger, and Jazz Chisholm have all failed to record a hit against him.

The only silver lining for New York is that a splitter is not included within that five-pitch mix. In the last two losses for New York, Kevin Gausman and Trey Yesavage utilized the splitter as their putaway pitch. Since the Yankees have faced Gausman several times before, they knew to attack the fastball, which allowed an efficient 5.2 innings while allowing just one run.

Yesavage, on the other hand, was untouchable, going 5.1 no-hit innings, striking out 11.

However, the goal against Bieber is to get him out of the game as early as possible, in hopes of seeing more of the Blue Jays’ bullpen.

On the year, the Blue Jays had the 16th-ranked bullpen in baseball, which hurt their already impressive record in close games due to blown leads.

While Game Two was already out of reach, the Yankees’ offense managed to surpass four runs for the first time this postseason.

While the challenge to limit the Blue Jays’ lineup could determine the series, it may all not matter if the best offense in baseball this year fails to deliver one more time.

But, with these matchup differences coming as the series progresses, there may be reason to believe in the pinstripes to extend the series.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/tylersmall/2025/10/07/why-the-alds-battle-between-new-york-and-toronto-isnt-over-yet/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Core developers blasted the Ethereum Foundation: In the face of huge wealth, you have long abandoned ideals and principles

Core developers blasted the Ethereum Foundation: In the face of huge wealth, you have long abandoned ideals and principles

By Péter Szilágyi Compiled by GaryMa Wu on Blockchain Original link: https://gist.github.com/karalabe/a2bc53436f29e0711fe680d59e180f6c background Péter Szilágyi, a former Ethereum core developer and Geth maintainer, recently publicly disclosed a letter he sent to the leadership of the Ethereum Foundation (EF) a year and a half ago. In the letter, he frankly expressed his disappointment with the Ethereum Foundation and pointed out serious problems within the foundation, such as unfair salaries, conflicts of interest, and concentration of power. Péter Szilagyi, who has worked at the Ethereum Foundation since 2016, reportedly was fired in November after discovering a "secret second Geth team." He announced a leave of absence, but in reality, it was a one-on-one conversation with Josh Stark regarding the team. Within 24 hours, he was fired by the Foundation, citing "unacceptable threats of resignation and damage to team morale." This "secret" team may refer to the Geth rollup publicly announced in October, though never released through work channels. Furthermore, funding issues have surfaced, with Ethereum Foundation Co-Executive Director Tomasz K. Stańczak threatening to significantly reduce the salaries of Geth developers. Szilagyi also mentioned that the Foundation had repeatedly attempted to spin off Geth into a private entity, but Stańczak denied such plans. Szilagyi's previous outbursts over workload and salary issues have tested the patience of some investors. The Geth client suffers from issues such as an inability to flexibly prune storage like Bitcoin and Ethereum's L2 clients, a storage requirement of up to 700GB with no technical justification, and potential decentralization implications. Maintaining two clients also creates additional inefficiencies and complexity. The Foundation has repeatedly invited Szilagyi to return, but he declined, posing an apology as a condition. The following is a translation of the full letter: Hello everyone, Over the past few years, I've often felt insecure about Ethereum, my role on the Geth team, my role within the Ethereum Foundation (EF), and even my place in the Ethereum ecosystem as a whole. (No, I'm not resigning, at least not yet.) I've occasionally discussed various troubling issues with Felix, Martin, and occasionally Josh. These conversations always offer a moment of relief, but I always end up back where I started. I've even realized that I can't quite articulate what my real problem is (thanks to Felix for pointing that out). So, I decided to take some time to sort through my thoughts, and this post is essentially a summary of those reflections (or at least, I hope it will be one; I've only just begun writing it). Before I say anything negative about Ethereum or any particular person, I want to emphasize that I've always believed that Ethereum is a force for positive change in the world, and that the Foundation is a benign force behind that change (even though I've often criticized its decisions as naive). Working for Ethereum and the Foundation has been a privilege and a highlight of my career. I'm incredibly grateful for everything I've gained financially, personally, and professionally, and I'm constantly amazed at how people have tolerated me even when I've been embarrassing myself (sometimes publicly). For that, I'm deeply grateful. Please don't interpret any of the following criticisms as doomsaying about Ethereum's fate, but rather as my own personal reflections on why Ethereum failed for me. My main issue with Ethereum right now is the intense dissonance I perceive between my publicly stated role and how I'm actually treated behind the scenes. More often than not, the foundation portrays me as someone with a "leadership role" in the ecosystem; yet whenever public conflict arises, the foundation's stance is usually that "this is all planned" because Ethereum "values diverse perspectives." I challenge this narrative—Dankrad summed it up so elegantly in a private message: I simply hold a "perceived leadership role" (I envy his phrasing). I see myself as a "leader" simply because I've maintained Geth's public image for the past nine years; because I've held firm against some less-than-honest participants in the past; and because I've dared to publicly question those in power, sometimes even within the foundation itself. People love to see action, and what better way to demonstrate "impartiality" than when someone within the foundation publicly confronts the foundation? But personally, every such outburst erodes my social credit and the credibility of the Geth team. Every time I push back against a powerful figure, more and more voices come to their defense. For example, when I questioned Justin/Dankrad's conflict of interest, Giulio from Erigon immediately jumped to their defense, saying, "There's nothing wrong with accepting the highest bidder." Whatever the truth, I've long felt like a "useful idiot" in the eyes of the Foundation—a lose-lose situation for me. I could choose to remain silent and watch Geth and its values be trampled upon, allowing the big players to reshape the protocol at will. Or I could speak out, damaging my reputation every time I speak out because it would prevent certain individuals from profiting from Ethereum. Either way, the outcome would be the same: Geth (and therefore, myself) would eventually be removed from the game. Of course, I could also "turn the table" and exit—the same outcome, just faster. For better or worse, I believe the Foundation bears a significant responsibility: from promoting client diversity, to designing consensus penalty mechanisms, to getting influential researchers to promote new clients that "use dirty tricks but move in the right direction." Despite being one of the earliest teams in the ecosystem (besides Vitalik himself), I haven't felt much gratitude for sticking around. The sentiment is perfectly captured by the Twitter chatter: "Thanks for helping us build this empire, now let those who can make money take over." This is the first reason why I think Ethereum "failed" for me: we set out to build something great, but when enough money was on the table, we didn't hesitate to abandon our principles. This brings me to my second pain point in Ethereum: the conflict between workers and speculators. Working at the Ethereum Foundation has always been a poor financial decision. Since I initiated an "internal reform" two years ago, compensation for the Geth team has improved somewhat (for employees). But let's look at the numbers: in my first six years at Ethereum—from zero to $450 billion in market capitalization—my total compensation was $625,000 (pre-tax, total, six years, no incentives). This is a true reflection of what it's like to be a "worker" at the Ethereum Foundation. Geth's financial situation is better now, but I'm sure other positions within the Foundation (such as operations, administration, and even research) still make significantly less. This situation is a breeding ground for conflicts of interest and protocol capture. Almost all of the foundation's early employees have long since left, as that was the only way they could earn enough to justify their contributions. Those who remain are exploited by the foundation—they "do it for the sake of faith, not the money." In Vitalik's words, "If no one complains about being underpaid, then they're overpaid." I consider this one of the most significant failures of the foundation's leadership. The structure within the foundation, which deliberately keeps salary information secret, reinforces my belief that, even if it was initially an unintentional mistake, the foundation has become completely reliant on it. Why am I bringing this up now that Geth's financial situation has improved? Because the Foundation is effectively setting the stage for protocol capture. By systematically underpaying those who truly care about the protocol, the EF forces the most trusted individuals to seek compensation elsewhere. I believe Justin and Dankrad's recent advisory positions are blatant conflicts of interest and potential protocol capture, and they themselves are unreasonably downplaying the risks—yes, I do. But are they being paid unjustly? No. They are simply accepting the consequences of what the Foundation has sown. The genie is out of the bottle. The Foundation has deprived every employee of "life-changing wealth" over the past decade, and any attempt to remedy this situation is pointless. Blinded by their own bottomless reserves, and further detached from reality by Vitalik's personal wealth, the Foundation has never considered that the people who work for them deserve a similarly comfortable life. No one objects to founders receiving a share of their success, but the Foundation—under Vitalik's leadership—has gone to great lengths to avoid paying its employees fairly. This is the second reason why Ethereum "failed" for me: the Foundation put the protocol at risk of capture, not out of malice, but out of a kind of subtractive idealism—a naive belief, disconnected from reality, that people don't care about money. Next, let's talk about Ethereum's "high-level players." I have great respect for Vitalik, but he's become a victim of his own success. Whether he likes it or not, he has always—and still does—determine what succeeds and what doesn't in Ethereum. His focus, the research he guides, his donations and investments, virtually determine which projects succeed (with a very high probability). His opinions also directly define what is "allowed" and what is not in the ecosystem. In other words, the rule of survival in the gray area is to make Vitalik feel "okay." Ethereum may be decentralized, but Vitalik has absolute indirect control over it. This might not be a problem in itself, but over the past decade, the entire ecosystem has exploited this phenomenon. In the early days of the foundation, founders and early holders competed openly and covertly for power and influence. Later, meeting attendees realized that the key to success lay with Vitalik, and everyone worked to "encircle" him. Ultimately, this evolved into a small inner circle of "Ethereum thought leaders"—a group of five to ten individuals who invest in or serve as advisors to nearly every project. Today, success requires only the approval of these core figures (or Vitalik himself) (as Farcaster demonstrates). At this point, the problem isn't Vitalik himself; it's the formation of a "ruling elite" within Ethereum. New projects no longer raise funds publicly; instead, they directly approach the same five to ten familiar faces for investment or advisory positions. Everyone understands: if you can get Bankless to invest, they'll sing its praises on podcasts; if you can hire researchers as advisors, you'll not only solve technical problems but also mitigate the risk of friction with the Ethereum mainnet. The key to this gray area is getting those five people to agree. Look at every new project, and you'll see the same group of people fueling each other's momentum. Zoom in a little, and you'll see the same one to three venture capital firms behind it. This is the third reason why I consider Ethereum a "failure": We aspired to create a world where everyone is equal, but today's most successful projects are backed by the same 5-10 individuals, backed by the same venture capital firms. All power is concentrated in Vitalik's circle of friends. The direction of Ethereum ultimately depends on your relationship with Vitalik. It's simple: people are more tolerant of their friends than outsiders—so, to succeed, befriend the "kingmakers." I choose to remain distant because I find the idea of making friends for money disgusting; yet, it pains me deeply—because this is the reality of our "trustless little empire." As for where all this leads us, I honestly don't know. I don't think Ethereum is irreparable. I don't see any path to reversal. I feel the foundation's loyalties are already irrevocable. I feel Vitalik, despite his good intentions, has created a ruling class that will never relinquish power. You either go along with the crowd or get sidelined (at least they pay you well). As for Geth, I feel like we've been labeled a "problem" within the larger picture of Ethereum—and I'm right at the center of that problem—so I don't see any future for myself in continuing to fight this. Over the years, I've turned down many insanely high-paying offers simply to stay committed to Ethereum. This has always been the "right mindset" the Foundation has promoted. However, the entire Ethereum ecosystem has now unanimously decided, "This is just a business." I can't accept this mindset. I also question whether I can still stay in the ecosystem if I leave Ethereum or the Foundation. So, I'm currently caught between two difficult choices. Let's wait and see how the future unfolds. With the sincerest wishes, Peter
Share
2025/10/22 12:00
Share