The post IRS Issues Guidance On How Controversial ERC Refunds Will Be Treated Under New Tax Law appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The IRS has offered some guidance on the Employee Retention Credit in the way of FAQs. getty Taxpayers and tax practitioners assumed that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) would address some unanswered questions related to the controversial Employee Retention Credit (ERC) program—and it did. The IRS has now issued FAQs to help taxpayers understand how the OBBBA provisions affect ERC claims and refunds. Here’s what you need to know. What is the ERC Program? The ERC program was intended as a way to help businesses keep the lights on during the pandemic. Under the ERC program, eligible employers included those that paid qualified wages to some or all employees after March 12, 2020, and before January 1, 2022. Typically, to qualify, a business needed to demonstrate that a government order shut the business down due to the pandemic during 2020 or the first three calendar quarters of 2021, or that the business experienced a specific decline in gross receipts during the relevant periods in 2020 or the first three calendar quarters of 2021. Some businesses may also qualify as recovery startup businesses for the third or fourth quarters of 2021. The amount of the credit was significant: 50% of up to $10,000 in wages, meaning it can be as high as $5,000 per employee in 2020 and as high as $21,000 per employee in 2021. When it Comes to the ERC, What Changed Under OBBBA? OBBBA introduced new provisions aimed at addressing improper ERC claims and clarifying the time limits for claiming or refunding credits. Specifically, the law (under section 70605(d) of OBBBA) prevents the IRS from allowing or refunding ERCs after July 4, 2025, for the third and fourth quarters of 2021 if those claims were filed after January 31, 2024, even if you otherwise met eligibility… The post IRS Issues Guidance On How Controversial ERC Refunds Will Be Treated Under New Tax Law appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The IRS has offered some guidance on the Employee Retention Credit in the way of FAQs. getty Taxpayers and tax practitioners assumed that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) would address some unanswered questions related to the controversial Employee Retention Credit (ERC) program—and it did. The IRS has now issued FAQs to help taxpayers understand how the OBBBA provisions affect ERC claims and refunds. Here’s what you need to know. What is the ERC Program? The ERC program was intended as a way to help businesses keep the lights on during the pandemic. Under the ERC program, eligible employers included those that paid qualified wages to some or all employees after March 12, 2020, and before January 1, 2022. Typically, to qualify, a business needed to demonstrate that a government order shut the business down due to the pandemic during 2020 or the first three calendar quarters of 2021, or that the business experienced a specific decline in gross receipts during the relevant periods in 2020 or the first three calendar quarters of 2021. Some businesses may also qualify as recovery startup businesses for the third or fourth quarters of 2021. The amount of the credit was significant: 50% of up to $10,000 in wages, meaning it can be as high as $5,000 per employee in 2020 and as high as $21,000 per employee in 2021. When it Comes to the ERC, What Changed Under OBBBA? OBBBA introduced new provisions aimed at addressing improper ERC claims and clarifying the time limits for claiming or refunding credits. Specifically, the law (under section 70605(d) of OBBBA) prevents the IRS from allowing or refunding ERCs after July 4, 2025, for the third and fourth quarters of 2021 if those claims were filed after January 31, 2024, even if you otherwise met eligibility…

IRS Issues Guidance On How Controversial ERC Refunds Will Be Treated Under New Tax Law

2025/10/23 08:56

The IRS has offered some guidance on the Employee Retention Credit in the way of FAQs.

getty

Taxpayers and tax practitioners assumed that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) would address some unanswered questions related to the controversial Employee Retention Credit (ERC) program—and it did. The IRS has now issued FAQs to help taxpayers understand how the OBBBA provisions affect ERC claims and refunds.

Here’s what you need to know.

What is the ERC Program?

The ERC program was intended as a way to help businesses keep the lights on during the pandemic. Under the ERC program, eligible employers included those that paid qualified wages to some or all employees after March 12, 2020, and before January 1, 2022. Typically, to qualify, a business needed to demonstrate that a government order shut the business down due to the pandemic during 2020 or the first three calendar quarters of 2021, or that the business experienced a specific decline in gross receipts during the relevant periods in 2020 or the first three calendar quarters of 2021. Some businesses may also qualify as recovery startup businesses for the third or fourth quarters of 2021.

The amount of the credit was significant: 50% of up to $10,000 in wages, meaning it can be as high as $5,000 per employee in 2020 and as high as $21,000 per employee in 2021.

When it Comes to the ERC, What Changed Under OBBBA?

OBBBA introduced new provisions aimed at addressing improper ERC claims and clarifying the time limits for claiming or refunding credits.

Specifically, the law (under section 70605(d) of OBBBA) prevents the IRS from allowing or refunding ERCs after July 4, 2025, for the third and fourth quarters of 2021 if those claims were filed after January 31, 2024, even if you otherwise met eligibility requirements.

Other parts of the bill strengthen compliance enforcement by imposing penalties on certain promoters of the ERC who fail to meet due diligence requirements when assisting with certain credit claims.

Why Were There Changes in the First Place?

According to the IRS, the ERC program was a magnet for fraud. In September 2023, citing “rising concerns about a flood of improper Employee Retention Credit claims,” the IRS announced an immediate moratorium on processing new ERC claims. “We assumed we’d see a trickle,” then-serving IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel said, referencing the timing of the claims. “We are seeing a tsunami.”

At the time of the announcement—well after the pandemic had ended—the IRS reported that it had received 3.6 million ERC claims. The open inventory currently includes approximately 600,000 returns—most of which were received within the last 90 days. That represents 15% of all ERC claims since the program opened.

Werfel ordered the moratorium following growing concerns inside the tax agency and from tax professionals, as well as media reports, that a substantial share of new claims from the aging program are ineligible. The fear from tax pros was that businesses were being pressured and scammed by aggressive promoters and marketing, and were therefore making improper ERC claims that could put them at financial risk.

To address some of these issues, in December 2023, the IRS announced a voluntary disclosure program (VDP) for businesses that wish to repay the money they received after filing erroneous ERC claims. The program closed on March 22, 2024, after the IRS received over 2,600 applications with $1.09 billion of improper claims. Businesses accepted into the program had to pay only 80% of the credit received. In addition, the IRS did not charge interest or penalties on any credits that were repaid. And, if the IRS had paid interest on an ERC refund claim, businesses would not need to repay that interest.

Last November, the IRS launched a second ERC voluntary disclosure program, which was only applicable to tax periods in 2021. Under that version, businesses were required to repay 85% of the credit received. As before, the IRS did not charge interest or penalties on any credits that were repaid promptly. And as before, if the IRS paid interest on your ERC refund claim, businesses didn’t need to repay that interest.

Businesses that didn’t qualify for the voluntary disclosure program but submitted a questionable claim could also consider a withdrawal. Under the withdrawal option, individuals who have filed an ERC claim but have not received a refund can withdraw their submission, avoiding future repayment, interest, and penalties.

Despite those options, the IRS still faced a massive backlog of ERC claims that they considered fraudulent. Congress put an end to some of what were considered last-minute claims—and the most likely, the IRS felt, to be fraudulent—with these new (retroactive) limitations under OBBBA.

Are all ERC Claims for the Third and Fourth Quarters of 2021 Limited Under OBBBA?

No, only new ERC claims filed after January 31, 2024, are limited by section 70605(d). If you filed an ERC claim before that time, you are not impacted. If you have already received your ERC refund, you are not impacted (barring fraud or other misconduct).

What If I Claimed an ERC for the Third or Fourth Quarter of 2021 Before January 31, 2024, and Then Filed an Amended Return Withdrawing It?

There’s no impact. Section 70605(d) does not apply to your amended return. The IRS will process your amended return, withdrawing the claimed ERC.

Can I Still File a Return Claiming an ERC for the Third or Fourth Quarter of 2021 if I Missed the January 31, 2024, Deadline?

No. No new ERCs claimed on a return for those periods will be allowed or refunded if filed after the January 31, 2024, deadline. (Even without OBBBA, the statute of limitations has run.)

When Is My Tax Return Considered Filed for OBBBA Purposes?

An original or amended return claiming a ERC refund is treated as filed on or before January 31, 2024, if the claim was postmarked and properly mailed or submitted to the appropriate IRS office by that date.

Can the IRS Continue Processing Other Items on a Return if an ERC Claimed on That Return Is Limited by OBBBA?

Yes. If the disallowed ERC claim is just one of other items claimed on your return, the IRS can continue to process the other items.

Can I Appeal If My ERC Is Disallowed as a Result of OBBBA?

Yes. If your claim is disallowed, you will receive Letter 105-C, Claim Disallowed. You may appeal to the IRS Independent Office of Appeals if you believe the IRS improperly disallowed it under OBBBA.

(Quick note: Appeals is largely shut down right now, thanks to the budget impasse. You can timely file your appeal, but if you have an appointment related to the Independent Office of Appeals during the shutdown, it will be cancelled. IRS personnel will reschedule those meetings when the government reopens.)

This is Good, Right? I Can Rely on This Info?

Er, not exactly.

The IRS issued this guidance in Fact Sheet 2025-07.

But it’s important to understand that guidance found on the IRS website isn’t to be treated as gospel. Specifically, as the IRS has reminded us time and again, FAQs and other information on the IRS website are not included in the Internal Revenue Bulletin and can’t be relied upon as legal authority. This means that the information cannot be used to support a legal argument in a court case.

So What Should I Do?

I always encourage taxpayers to consult a tax professional. And, of course, keep checking in with our Forbes team for more information.

ForbesJudge Dismisses Case Against Employee Retention Credit Provider, Finding No HarmForbesDefendants Charged With Filing Over 8,000 False Tax Returns In Largest COVID Tax Credit Case To DateForbesIRS Says It Has Stopped Nearly $5 Billion In Bogus Employee Retention Credit Claims In Recent WeeksForbesIRS, Citing Rampant Fraud, Stops Processing Covid Era Employment Tax Credit

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphillipserb/2025/10/22/irs-issues-guidance-on-how-controversial-erc-refunds-will-be-treated-under-new-tax-law/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Deze veelbelovende altcoin stopt er uit het niets volledig mee

Deze veelbelovende altcoin stopt er uit het niets volledig mee

Onverwachts nieuws op de cryptomarkt vandaag: Kadena, ooit gezien als een van de meest veelbelovende alternatieven voor Ethereum, stopt per direct met zijn activiteiten. Het team achter de blockchain maakte via X bekend dat het project “niet langer in staat is om de bedrijfsvoering voort te zetten”. De KDA token kelderde binnen enkele uren met meer dan 60% naar ongeveer $0,09, terwijl het in 2021 nog boven de $27 stond. Check onze Discord Connect met "like-minded" crypto enthousiastelingen Leer gratis de basis van Bitcoin & trading - stap voor stap, zonder voorkennis. Krijg duidelijke uitleg & charts van ervaren analisten. Sluit je aan bij een community die samen groeit. Nu naar Discord Van grote belofte tot plots einde Kadena werd in 2019 opgericht door twee voormalige medewerkers van de SEC en de JPMorgan. Oprichters Stuart Popejoy en William Martino wilden met hun eigen blockchain een brug slaan tussen de traditionele financiële wereld en crypto. Hun visie: een proof-of-work-netwerk dat de snelheid en schaalbaarheid van moderne ketens combineert met de veiligheid van Bitcoin. Kadena moest het antwoord worden op Ethereum’s hoge kosten en beperkte capaciteit, een netwerk waar banken en bedrijven zich veilig op konden vestigen. In de beginjaren groeide het project snel. Kadena haalde $15 miljoen op via drie financieringsrondes, breidde zijn team fors uit en wist meerdere institutionele partners aan te trekken. Maar de beloofde doorbraak bleef uit. Terwijl concurrenten als Solana, Avalanche en Base marktaandeel wonnen, verloor Kadena langzaam terrein. KADENA PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT We regret to announce that the Kadena organization is no longer able to continue business operations and will be ceasing all business activity and active maintenance of the Kadena blockchain immediately. We are tremendously grateful to everybody who… — Kadena (@kadena_io) October 21, 2025 “We kunnen niet langer doorgaan” In het officiële statement schrijft het team: “We zijn enorm dankbaar voor iedereen die deel uitmaakte van deze reis. Helaas dwingen de marktomstandigheden ons om onze activiteiten stop te zetten. We kunnen de verdere adoptie van deze unieke technologie niet langer ondersteunen.” Hoewel het netwerk zelf voorlopig blijft draaien, zolang er nog miners actief zijn, stopt de stichting achter Kadena met alle ontwikkeling, marketing en onderhoud. Ongeveer 566 miljoen KDA zullen nog worden vrijgegeven als mining beloningen tot het jaar 2139, maar zonder actief team is het onduidelijk hoe lang het netwerk levensvatbaar blijft. Nieuwe cryptomuntenKom als eerste te weten wat de nieuwste cryptomunten van dit moment zijn! Elke crypto investeerder is er naar op zoek: een nieuwe crypto met groot groeipotentieel. Na de afgelopen crash van de cryptomarkt, is Bitcoin volgens analisten weer klaar voor een stijging. Dat lijkt ook voor altcoins het geval te zijn, nu miljardairs weer volop investeren. Dit zou zomaar eens een nieuwe crypto bull run af kunnen… Continue reading Deze veelbelovende altcoin stopt er uit het niets volledig mee document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() { var screenWidth = window.innerWidth; var excerpts = document.querySelectorAll('.lees-ook-description'); excerpts.forEach(function(description) { var excerpt = description.getAttribute('data-description'); var wordLimit = screenWidth wordLimit) { var trimmedDescription = excerpt.split(' ').slice(0, wordLimit).join(' ') + '...'; description.textContent = trimmedDescription; } }); }); De val van een ‘Ethereum killer’ Kadena stond ooit bekend als een van de meest technisch geavanceerde projecten in de sector. De eigen programmeertaal Pact en het multi-chain-ontwerp moesten de basis vormen voor een nieuw tijdperk van zakelijke blockchain-toepassingen. Toch bleek de praktijk weerbarstig. Het ecosysteem bleef klein, de liquiditeit laag en de developers activiteit daalde fors sinds 2023. Pogingen om via een “hiring spree” en nieuwe partnerships terug te keren op het voorplan leverden weinig op. Wat betekent dit voor de markt? Het plotselinge einde van Kadena laat zien hoe kwetsbaar zelfs goed gefinancierde blockchain projecten kunnen zijn in een sector die constant in beweging is. Terwijl Bitcoin en Ethereum blijven domineren, vallen veel zogeheten “Ethereum killers” stil door gebrek aan gebruikers, inkomsten of vertrouwen. Voor beleggers die nog KDA tokens bezitten, rest weinig perspectief. Zonder actief ontwikkelteam en zonder duidelijk plan voor governance of onderhoud, lijkt de kans groot dat het netwerk langzaam doodbloedt. Het is een harde les voor de markt: in crypto draait het niet alleen om technologie of beloften, maar om duurzame adoptie. En die blijkt, zelfs na 6 jaar development, allesbehalve vanzelfsprekend. Best wallet - betrouwbare en anonieme wallet Best wallet - betrouwbare en anonieme wallet Meer dan 60 chains beschikbaar voor alle crypto Vroege toegang tot nieuwe projecten Hoge staking belongingen Lage transactiekosten Best wallet review Koop nu via Best Wallet Let op: cryptocurrency is een zeer volatiele en ongereguleerde investering. Doe je eigen onderzoek. Het bericht Deze veelbelovende altcoin stopt er uit het niets volledig mee is geschreven door Gijs Smit en verscheen als eerst op Bitcoinmagazine.nl.
Share
2025/10/23 12:46
Share
Music body ICMP laments “wilful” theft of artists’ work

Music body ICMP laments “wilful” theft of artists’ work

The post Music body ICMP laments “wilful” theft of artists’ work appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A major music industry group, ICMP, has lamented the use of artists’ work by AI companies, calling them guilty of “wilful” copyright infringement, as the battle between the tech firms and the arts industry continues. The Brussels-based group known as the International Confederation of Music Publishers (ICMP) comprises major record labels and other music industry professionals. Their voice adds to many others within the arts industry that have expressed displeasure at AI firms for using their creative work to train their systems without permission. ICMP accuses AI firms of deliberate copyright infringement ICMP director general John Phelan told AFP that big tech firms and AI-specific companies were involved in what he termed “the largest copyright infringement exercise that has been seen.” He cited the likes of OpenAI, Suno, Udio, and Mistral as some of the culprits. The ICMP carried out an investigation for nearly two years to ascertain how generative AI firms were using material by creatives to enrich themselves. The Brussels-based group is one of a number of industry bodies that span across news media and publishing to target the fast-growing AI sector over its use of content without paying any royalties. Suno and Udio, who are AI music generators, can produce tracks with voices, melodies, and musical styles that echo those of the original artists such as the Beatles, Depeche Mode, Mariah Carey, and the Beach boys. “What is legal or illegal is how the technologies are used. That means the corporate decisions made by the chief executives of companies matter immensely and should comply with the law,” Phelan told AFP. “What we see is they are engaged in wilful, commercial-scale copyright infringement.” Phelan. In June last year, a US trade group, the Recording Industry Association of America, filed a lawsuit against Suno and Udio. However, an exception…
Share
2025/09/18 04:41
Share