For nearly two years, gold has done what few assets have managed, which is stay glued above its 200-day moving average, a line most traders treat like a sanity test for markets. That’s an unusual record in the metal’s trading history and a sign that investors aren’t backing away from it anytime soon. The rally […]For nearly two years, gold has done what few assets have managed, which is stay glued above its 200-day moving average, a line most traders treat like a sanity test for markets. That’s an unusual record in the metal’s trading history and a sign that investors aren’t backing away from it anytime soon. The rally […]

Investors overhaul portfolios as gold joins the core

2025/10/20 04:40

For nearly two years, gold has done what few assets have managed, which is stay glued above its 200-day moving average, a line most traders treat like a sanity test for markets.

That’s an unusual record in the metal’s trading history and a sign that investors aren’t backing away from it anytime soon. The rally hasn’t cooled either.

Spot gold has now rallied for nine consecutive weeks, something that’s happened only five times in the past fifty years.

From October 1975 to October 2025, there have been 2,601 rolling nine-week periods, and in just 0.19% of them, gold managed a winning streak like this. In each of the four previous cases, the metal kept rising in the months that followed, one month later, three months, six, twelve, and even two years later.

The setup looks familiar to those who’ve watched the market before. Lax fiscal and monetary policies around the world, and even political interference in central bank independence, have stoked fears of inflation that keep dragging real interest rates lower.

Add in Trump’s White House openly pushing for a weaker dollar, and you’ve got a backdrop where a zero-yielding asset like gold suddenly looks like a stronger bet than most government paper. Still, deciding whether gold has gone “too far” remains a guessing game.

There’s no formula for its true value. Stocks have earnings, bonds have yields, but gold doesn’t have either. Yet the metal has more than doubled in five years and climbed over 250% in the last decade. That’s made the question “how high is too high?” harder than ever to answer.

Investors overhaul portfolios as gold joins the core

The old 60/40 portfolio, stocks and bonds, has lost its shine. Traders and analysts are turning toward a 60/20/20 model, where alternatives like gold and crypto take up a bigger role.

The thing is, bonds don’t hedge like they used to. Inflation, government debt, and geopolitical risk have both asset classes moving in the same direction too often. “We are seeing greater adoption of non-equity, non-fixed-income products,” said Todd Rosenbluth, head of research at VettaFi.

The metal recently hit an all-time high above $4,300, up more than 60% since January, pushed by central bank buying, de-dollarization, and what traders are calling “the debasement trade.”

Steve Schoffstall, director of ETF product management at Sprott, explained that shift on ETF Edge: “What’s really happening now is a shift into the acceptance of gold.” He added that many economists now favor the 60/20/20 structure instead of 60/40, while also saying, “Most people are probably well positioned if they have a 5%-15% allocation to physical gold.”

Gold funds see record inflows as demand keeps building

The rally has been matched by surging ETF inflows. The SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU) are both up around 11% this month, and the momentum goes back to early 2025.

The World Gold Council said that September brought the largest monthly inflows ever for gold ETFs, totaling nearly $11 billion. GLD alone pulled in $4 billion, and by mid-October, it added another $1.3 billion, data from ETFAction.com shows.

This year’s total movement into gold funds has already topped $38 billion, Sprott confirmed. That level of capital reallocation underscores how investors are repositioning toward hard assets amid fiscal uncertainty and volatile fiat markets.

For now, the numbers say it all, two years above the 200-day average, nine weeks of straight gains, and billions flowing into gold-backed funds. Whatever comes next, gold has proven it’s not just holding the line. It’s rewriting what “stability” looks like in a market that no longer trusts anything that prints.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Ethereum's "double crisis": core talent continues to leave, and technical debt quietly accumulates

Ethereum's "double crisis": core talent continues to leave, and technical debt quietly accumulates

By Eric, Foresight News On the evening of the 19th Beijing time, Bankless co-founder David Hoffman posted a message on X to "mourn" Dankrad Feist, the longest-serving researcher at the Ethereum Foundation, who chose to leave Ethereum and join the stablecoin L1 Tempo. David Hoffman believes the issue of for-profit companies co-opting the talent cultivated by the Ethereum open-source community is significant, and argues that these companies do not, as they claim, bring greater benefits to Ethereum. He bluntly stated, "In my view, Tempo's purpose is to intercept the trillions of dollars in stablecoins expected to flow in over the next decade and place them on their private blockchain. While this will certainly expand the market, Tempo still intends to grab as much of the pie as possible." He believes Tempo will inevitably be constrained by compliance issues, which even issuing tokens cannot address. While both Tempo and Ethereum will bring change to the world, Ethereum is uniquely suited to serve as a trusted, neutral global settlement layer, without shareholders and unconstrained by law. The feeling of disappointment with Ethereum began to surface when its price began to lag behind Bitcoin's in this cycle. However, over time, people began to realize that the exodus of talented individuals from the Ethereum community seemed irreversible. When dreams conflicted with self-interest, many ultimately chose the latter, a fact that many in the industry have long worried about. Dankrad Feist is not the first and will not be the last Dankrad Feist announced his joining Tempo at X on the 17th of this month and stated that he would continue to serve as a research advisor for the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol Cluster's three strategic initiatives: scaling Layer 1, scaling Blobs, and improving user experience. He stated, "Ethereum has strong values and technology choices that make it unique. Tempo will be a great complement, building on similar technology and values while pushing boundaries in scale and speed. I believe this will be a significant benefit to Ethereum. Tempo's open-source technology can be easily integrated back into Ethereum, benefiting the entire ecosystem." According to LinkedIn, Dankrad Feist officially joined Ethereum as a researcher in 2019, focusing on sharding technology, which can scale the Ethereum mainnet. Danksharding, one of the core components of Ethereum's current scaling roadmap, is named after him. Danksharding is a key technical path for Ethereum to achieve high-throughput and low-cost transactions, and is widely considered by the community to be the most important upgrade direction after Ethereum 2.0. Dankrad Feist promoted Proto-Danksharding (EIP-4844), a predecessor of Danksharding. This EIP introduced the blob transaction type, providing a cheaper and more efficient data availability layer for Rollup, significantly reducing the data publishing cost of Rollup. In addition, he had a public debate with Geth development lead Péter Szilágyi on the MEV issue, which eventually prompted Vitalik to step in to coordinate and promote the community's attention to MEV mitigation mechanisms (such as PBS, Proposer-Builder Separation). Tempo researcher Mallesh Pai introduced the members joining Tempo in September, and Liam Horne, former CEO of OP Labs and co-founder of ETHGlobal, also appeared on the list. Before Dankrad Feist, the person who surprised the industry was Danny Ryan, who co-founded Etherealize, a $40 million funding round. A former core member of the Ethereum Foundation and known as the "Chief Engineer of Ethereum 2.0," Ryan joined Etherealize just six months after announcing his indefinite departure in September 2024. However, given that Etherealize shares similarities with ConsenSys, founded by Ethereum co-founder Joseph Lubin 11 years prior amidst controversy over commercialization, Ryan's departure has been widely understood. What really worries David Hoffman are companies like Tempo and Paradigm. Well-known Ethereum developer Federico Carrone expressed a similar sentiment, retweeting David Hoffman's tweet about Dankrad Feist joining Tempo and stating that he has been saying for the past two years that Paradigm's influence within Ethereum could become a tail risk for the entire ecosystem. Federico Carrone wrote that the sole goal of a venture capital fund is to maximize returns for its limited partners. Ethereum shouldn't become deeply dependent on the technology of a venture capital firm that is playing its cards with extreme strategic skill. Following the FTX debacle, Paradigm removed nearly all cryptocurrency-related branding and made a high-profile shift to AI. Carrone believes this is proof enough of his point. After Trump returned to the White House, Paradigm re-entered the Web3 space, aggressively recruiting top researchers from the community, funding key Ethereum open-source libraries, and supporting Stripe's launch of Tempo. Carrone believes that while Paradigm claims its work is beneficial to Ethereum—more funding, more tools, more testing grounds, and the potential for new ideas to feed back into Ethereum—are all potential benefits, but when corporations have excessive visibility and influence over open-source projects, priorities shift from the community's long-term vision to corporate profits. Ethereum’s technical debt is accumulating The simple loss of talent in the Ethereum open source community may not cause widespread concern, but if the loss of talent is accompanied by the accumulation of technical debt, it is worthy of high vigilance. A week ago, a community user posted a screenshot on X, revealing that Solidity's top contributors have all but ceased development. Only Cameel continues to raise new issues and advance the technology, but appears to be in maintenance mode. He believes the community needs to invest more resources in supporting the programming language. Some users in the comments questioned why efforts were being expended on continuously improving and upgrading Solidity rather than simply maintaining it to ensure stability and security. The user who tweeted explained that even changing the Solidity compiler wouldn't change any deployed contracts, but could improve security, enhance the development experience, or support the use of new contracts. As can be seen in the chart above, development activity began to decline sharply at the beginning of the previous bull market. Federico Carrone also expressed his concern, stating that his biggest concern is that the numerous core tools and libraries built around Solidity may not receive long-term maintenance. Even the latest Solidity compiler is currently supported by only a handful of developers. Furthermore, companies involved in L2 and ZK technologies are downsizing, leaving the final iteration of cutting-edge technologies to a handful of companies. With increasing gas limits, many execution clients have not seen substantial performance improvements, and judging by the libraries, the development teams of these clients appear to be lagging behind. Federico Carrone said, “Ethereum’s technical debt continues to accumulate, not only because the protocol itself must continue to evolve, but also because many of its dependencies and surrounding repositories have become stagnant. The entire ecosystem continues to expand, protecting tens of billions of dollars in assets, while part of its foundation is quietly eroding.” Open source communities cannot simply "generate power with love" For an open-source community like Ethereum, which carries a vast amount of value that can be measured in real money, balancing "generate power with love" and economic incentives is a problem without any real precedent. This should be a matter of great concern to the Ethereum Foundation, but it seems to have been overlooked. Péter Szilágyi, who joined the Ethereum Foundation in 2015 and is responsible for the development and maintenance of Geth, clearly pointed out the three most disappointing problems in a letter to the leadership of the Ethereum Foundation a year and a half ago: being portrayed as a leader externally but marginalized internally; the serious disproportion between income and the growth of Ethereum's market value; and Vitalik and a small group of people around him having too much say in the Ethereum ecosystem. In late 2024, Péter Szilágyi discovered that the Ethereum Foundation was secretly incubating an independent fork of Geth. He was subsequently fired due to a dispute with the Ethereum Foundation and repeatedly declined rehire. The Ethereum Foundation even offered Szilágyi $5 million to separate Geth from the Foundation, but was rejected. Currently, Szilágyi maintains the Geth codebase as an independent contributor. Rumors of corruption within the Ethereum Foundation have been circulating, but this is a problem that should have been anticipated from the moment the Ethereum Foundation was founded. As the saying goes, "where there are people, there are gangs." We can't eliminate human greed, but we also can't allow Ethereum to gradually lose its core value due to commercialization. Ethereum's market capitalization of hundreds of billions of dollars, having handled trillions of dollars in on-chain value transfers for years, is built on infrastructure built by a professional technical team, centered on a permissionless, open-source ethos, and commercialized by a large number of businesses. However, simply maintaining such a massive system requires a significant workforce, and as we've discussed, these individuals are leaving due to disappointment or opting for other projects driven by financial gain. The Ethereum Foundation underwent drastic reforms this year, but so far, they haven't produced any significant results. Ethereum can still be called the world's computer, and its potential for commercial applications is still being explored by talented teams. However, as the foundation of all this, Ethereum cannot continue to disappoint those who still hold on to its ideals.
Share
2025/10/23 09:01
Share