The post California Enacts First US Rules for AI ‘Companion’ Chatbots appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief SB 243 makes California the first state to regulate AI “companion” chatbots that simulate friendship or romance. The law mandates identity disclosures, bans sexual or self-harm topics with minors, and sets suicide-response protocols. Safety groups say the final bill was “watered down” after lobbying, calling it “an empty gesture rather than meaningful policy.” California has become the first state to set explicit guardrails for “companion” chatbots, AI programs that mimic friendship or intimacy. Governor Gavin Newsom on Monday signed Senate Bill 243, which requires chatbots to identify themselves as artificial, restrict conversations about sex and self-harm with minors, and report instances of detected suicidal ideation to the state’s Office of Suicide Prevention. The law, authored by State Sen. Steve Padilla (D-San Diego), marks a new front in AI oversight—focusing less on model architecture or data bias and more on the emotional interface between humans and machines. It compels companies to issue regular reminders that users are talking to software, adopt protocols for responding to signs of self-harm, and maintain age-appropriate content filters.  The final bill is narrower than the one Padilla first introduced. Earlier versions called for third-party audits and applied to all users, not only minors; those provisions were dropped amid industry pressure. Too weak to do any good? Several advocacy groups said the final version of the bill was too weak to make a difference. Common Sense Media and the Tech Oversight Project both withdrew their support after lawmakers stripped out provisions for third-party audits and broader enforcement. In a statement to Tech Policy Press, one advocate said the revised bill risked becoming “an empty gesture rather than meaningful policy.” Newsom defended the law as a necessary guardrail for emerging technology. “Emerging technology like chatbots and social media can inspire, educate and connect—but without real… The post California Enacts First US Rules for AI ‘Companion’ Chatbots appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief SB 243 makes California the first state to regulate AI “companion” chatbots that simulate friendship or romance. The law mandates identity disclosures, bans sexual or self-harm topics with minors, and sets suicide-response protocols. Safety groups say the final bill was “watered down” after lobbying, calling it “an empty gesture rather than meaningful policy.” California has become the first state to set explicit guardrails for “companion” chatbots, AI programs that mimic friendship or intimacy. Governor Gavin Newsom on Monday signed Senate Bill 243, which requires chatbots to identify themselves as artificial, restrict conversations about sex and self-harm with minors, and report instances of detected suicidal ideation to the state’s Office of Suicide Prevention. The law, authored by State Sen. Steve Padilla (D-San Diego), marks a new front in AI oversight—focusing less on model architecture or data bias and more on the emotional interface between humans and machines. It compels companies to issue regular reminders that users are talking to software, adopt protocols for responding to signs of self-harm, and maintain age-appropriate content filters.  The final bill is narrower than the one Padilla first introduced. Earlier versions called for third-party audits and applied to all users, not only minors; those provisions were dropped amid industry pressure. Too weak to do any good? Several advocacy groups said the final version of the bill was too weak to make a difference. Common Sense Media and the Tech Oversight Project both withdrew their support after lawmakers stripped out provisions for third-party audits and broader enforcement. In a statement to Tech Policy Press, one advocate said the revised bill risked becoming “an empty gesture rather than meaningful policy.” Newsom defended the law as a necessary guardrail for emerging technology. “Emerging technology like chatbots and social media can inspire, educate and connect—but without real…

California Enacts First US Rules for AI ‘Companion’ Chatbots

2025/10/14 05:27

In brief

  • SB 243 makes California the first state to regulate AI “companion” chatbots that simulate friendship or romance.
  • The law mandates identity disclosures, bans sexual or self-harm topics with minors, and sets suicide-response protocols.
  • Safety groups say the final bill was “watered down” after lobbying, calling it “an empty gesture rather than meaningful policy.”

California has become the first state to set explicit guardrails for “companion” chatbots, AI programs that mimic friendship or intimacy. Governor Gavin Newsom on Monday signed Senate Bill 243, which requires chatbots to identify themselves as artificial, restrict conversations about sex and self-harm with minors, and report instances of detected suicidal ideation to the state’s Office of Suicide Prevention.

The law, authored by State Sen. Steve Padilla (D-San Diego), marks a new front in AI oversight—focusing less on model architecture or data bias and more on the emotional interface between humans and machines. It compels companies to issue regular reminders that users are talking to software, adopt protocols for responding to signs of self-harm, and maintain age-appropriate content filters.

The final bill is narrower than the one Padilla first introduced. Earlier versions called for third-party audits and applied to all users, not only minors; those provisions were dropped amid industry pressure.

Too weak to do any good?

Several advocacy groups said the final version of the bill was too weak to make a difference. Common Sense Media and the Tech Oversight Project both withdrew their support after lawmakers stripped out provisions for third-party audits and broader enforcement. In a statement to Tech Policy Press, one advocate said the revised bill risked becoming “an empty gesture rather than meaningful policy.”

Newsom defended the law as a necessary guardrail for emerging technology. “Emerging technology like chatbots and social media can inspire, educate and connect—but without real guardrails, technology can also exploit, mislead, and endanger our kids,” he said in a statement. “We can continue to lead in AI and technology, but we must do it responsibly—protecting our children every step of the way.”

SB 243 accompanies a broader suite of bills signed in recent weeks, including SB 53, which mandates that large AI developers publicly disclose their safety and risk-mitigation strategies. Together, they place California at the forefront of state-level AI governance.

But the new chatbot rules may prove tricky in practice. Developers warn that overly broad liability could prompt companies to restrict legitimate conversations about mental health or sexuality out of caution, depriving users, especially isolated teens, of valuable support.

Enforcement, too, could be difficult: a global chatbot company may struggle to verify who qualifies as a California minor or to monitor millions of daily exchanges. And as with many California firsts, there’s the risk that well-intentioned regulation ends up exported nationwide before anyone knows if it actually works.

Generally Intelligent Newsletter

A weekly AI journey narrated by Gen, a generative AI model.

Source: https://decrypt.co/344068/california-ai-companion-chatbots-regulation

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

House Judiciary Rejects Vote To Subpoena Banks CEOs For Epstein Case

House Judiciary Rejects Vote To Subpoena Banks CEOs For Epstein Case

The post House Judiciary Rejects Vote To Subpoena Banks CEOs For Epstein Case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline House Judiciary Committee Republicans blocked a Democrat effort Wednesday to subpoena a group of major banks as part of a renewed investigation into late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s financial ties. Congressman Jim Jordan, R-OH, is the chairman of the committee. (Photo by Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images) Anadolu via Getty Images Key Facts A near party-line vote squashed the effort to vote on a subpoena, with Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., who is leading a separate effort to force the Justice Department to release more Epstein case materials, voting alongside Democrats. The vote, if successful, would have resulted in the issuing of subpoenas to JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan, Deutsche Bank CEO Christian Sewing and Bank of New York Mellon CEO Robin Vince. The subpoenas would have specifically looked into multiple reports that claimed the four banks flagged $1.5 billion in suspicious transactions linked to Epstein. The failed effort from Democrats followed an FBI oversight hearing in which agency director Kash Patel misleadingly claimed the FBI cannot release many of the files it has on Epstein. Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We’re launching text message alerts so you’ll always know the biggest stories shaping the day’s headlines. Text “Alerts” to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here. Crucial Quote Dimon, who attended a lunch with Senate Republicans before the vote, according to Politico, told reporters, “We regret any association with that man at all. And, of course, if it’s a legal requirement, we would conform to it. We have no issue with that.” Chief Critic “Republicans had the chance to subpoena the CEOs of JPMorgan, Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of New York Mellon to expose Epstein’s money trail,” the House Judiciary Democrats said in a tweet. “Instead, they tried to bury…
Share
2025/09/18 08:02
Share