Bitcoin is not just an asset, it is infrastructure

2025/07/21 18:00

Author: Blockchain Knight

Institutional investors no longer question the legitimacy of Bitcoin. With spot ETF assets exceeding $50 billion and companies starting to issue convertible bonds linked to Bitcoin, the question now has shifted to a structural level: How does Bitcoin fit into the global financial system? The answer is becoming clear: Bitcoin financialization.

Bitcoin is becoming a programmable collateral and capital strategy optimization tool. Institutions that recognize this shift will lead the direction of finance in the next decade.

Traditional finance often views Bitcoin’s volatility as a disadvantage, but the recent zero-coupon convertible bonds issued by Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) tell a different story. Such transactions convert volatility into upside potential: the higher the volatility of the asset, the higher the value of the conversion option embedded in the bond. Subject to solvency conditions, such bonds provide investors with an asymmetric income structure while expanding the treasury’s exposure to value-added assets.

The trend is spreading. Japan’s Metaplanet has adopted a Bitcoin-focused strategy, and France’s The Blockchain Group and Twenty One Capital have joined the ranks of “Bitcoin portfolio companies.” This approach echoes the Bretton Woods-era strategy of sovereign states borrowing fiat currencies and converting them into hard assets. The digital version combines capital structure optimization with treasury value-added.

From Tesla’s diversification of its treasury to companies leveraging their Bitcoin portfolios to extend their balance sheet leverage, these are just two examples of how digital and traditional finance are intertwined. Bitcoin financialization is permeating every corner of modern markets.

Bitcoin as 24/7 collateral. According to Galaxy Digital data, the scale of Bitcoin pledge loans exceeded $4 billion in 2024, and continued to grow in the fields of centralized finance (CeFi) and decentralized finance (DeFi). These tools provide global 24/7 lending channels - a feature that traditional lending cannot achieve.

Structured products and on-chain yields. Today, a range of structured products offer built-in liquidity protection, principal protection or enhanced yield for Bitcoin exposure. On-chain platforms are also evolving: DeFi, which was initially driven by retail, is maturing into institutional-grade vaults, generating competitive returns with Bitcoin as the underlying collateral.

Beyond ETFs. ETFs are just the starting point. As the institutional-grade derivatives market develops, asset tokenized fund wrappers and structured notes add layers of liquidity, downside protection, and yield enhancement to the market.

Sovereign adoption. When US states draft Bitcoin reserve bills and countries explore "Bitbonds", we are no longer discussing diversification, but witnessing a new chapter in monetary sovereignty.

Regulation is not an obstacle, but a moat for early movers. The EU’s MiCA, Singapore’s Payment Services Act, and the SEC’s approval of tokenized money market funds (MMFs) all show that digital assets can be incorporated into the existing regulatory framework. Institutions that invest in custody, compliance, and licensing today will take the lead as global regulatory systems converge. BlackRock’s SEC-approved BUIDL fund is a clear example: a compliant tokenized money market fund launched within the existing regulatory framework.

Macro instability, currency debasement, rising interest rates, and fragmented payment infrastructure are accelerating the financialization of Bitcoin. Family offices that started with small directional allocations are now borrowing against Bitcoin; companies are issuing convertible bonds; and asset managers are launching structured strategies that combine yield with programmable exposure. The "digital gold" theory has matured into a broader capital strategy.

Challenges remain. Bitcoin still faces high market and liquidity risks, especially during periods of stress; the regulatory environment and the technical maturity of DeFi platforms continue to evolve. However, viewing Bitcoin as infrastructure rather than a pure asset can position investors in a system where appreciating collateral brings advantages that traditional assets cannot match.

Bitcoin remains volatile and not without risk, but with proper controls, it is transforming from a speculative asset to programmable infrastructure, a tool for yield generation, collateral management, and macro hedging.

The next wave of financial innovation will not only leverage Bitcoin, but will be built on top of it. Just as the Eurodollar revolutionized global liquidity in the 1960s, Bitcoin-denominated balance sheet strategies may create a similar impact in the 2030s.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Bitcoin Miner Mawson Fires CEO, Files Fraud Lawsuit – What’s Going On?

Bitcoin Miner Mawson Fires CEO, Files Fraud Lawsuit – What’s Going On?

Key Takeaways: Mewawalla’s dismissal follows broader scrutiny of executive pay practices in crypto infrastructure firms. The lawsuit marks Mawson’s second major legal dispute in 2025, both linked to operational asset control. Canaan’s ongoing expansion at Mawson’s site continues despite parallel litigation. Bitcoin miner Mawson Infrastructure has fired its CEO and President, Rahul Mewawalla, for cause, accusing him of breaching fiduciary duties and engaging in fraud. According to TheMinerMag , the board placed Mewawalla on administrative leave shortly after notifying him of potential termination on May 30. By July 8, his removal became official. Bitcoin Miner Mawson Sues Ex-CEO Mawson has also filed a lawsuit in Delaware’s Court of Chancery seeking damages and the return of compensation awarded earlier this year. In February, the board approved a $2.5 million cash bonus, 1.2 million restricted stock units, and a salary increase to $1.2 million for Mewawalla. The company cited “high-performing” leadership in that announcement. In a July 17 letter to Mawson’s board, Mewawalla disputed the accusations, stating he “respectfully and vigorously” disagreed with the company’s account. He referred to the board’s own prior filings, which credited him with 36% revenue growth and improved gross margins during his tenure. The company named General Counsel Kaliste Saloom as interim CEO. Mewawalla’s board seat has also been revoked. The lawsuit filed against Mewawalla has not yet been made public, and the company has not released further details about the specific misconduct alleged. Mewawalla has not publicly responded beyond his letter to the board. 🔋 AI firms are now using excess data center power to mine Bitcoin, helping to stabilize grids and improve energy efficiency. #Bitcoin #Mining #AI #RenewableEnergy https://t.co/8ZnTfdRETq — Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews) July 11, 2025 Second Legal Dispute in 2025 The complaint marks the second major legal dispute involving Mawson this year. In March, NYDIG’s parent company, Stone Ridge, and its mining subsidiary, Consensus Colocation, sued Mawson for allegedly taking control of 20,000 ASIC miners worth $30 million hosted at a facility in Midland, Pennsylvania. Mawson has since signed a new agreement with Canaan to host over 17,000 new units at the same Midland site. The three-year deal includes approximately 64 megawatts of capacity and supports Canaan’s 4.7 EH/s hashrate expansion in North America. The leadership change comes as the mining firm seeks to stabilize operations and attract partners in a competitive colocation market. Pending legal outcomes may influence future contractual relationships and financing terms. The incident reveals ongoing governance challenges in the crypto mining sector, where executive pay and accountability remain under heightened scrutiny. Boards may face increased pressure to justify incentive structures and enforce oversight mechanisms in such a volatile environment. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) What role does fiduciary duty play in crypto-native firms with hybrid operational models? In companies operating both infrastructure and financial services, fiduciary obligations may cover both traditional shareholders and tokenholders, adding complexity to governance enforcement and dispute resolution. How might this affect Mawson’s ability to secure future equipment or hosting partnerships? Ongoing legal disputes and leadership changes can raise counterparty risk concerns. Equipment manufacturers and hosting partners may renegotiate terms or delay new agreements pending resolution. Could regulatory agencies get involved? While the current proceedings are civil, if fraud is substantiated, state or federal regulators may initiate separate enforcement action depending on the facts.
Share
CryptoNews2025/07/23 00:48