Australia is set to introduce new laws that will require crypto companies and stablecoin issuers to obtain official licenses.Australia is set to introduce new laws that will require crypto companies and stablecoin issuers to obtain official licenses.

ASIC updates its guidance to show how financial laws apply to crypto, stablecoins, and staking services

2025/10/29 13:49

Australia’s financial regulator has expanded its oversight of digital assets as the government moves toward introducing landmark crypto licensing legislation aimed at bringing clarity and consumer protection to the country’s fast-growing digital economy.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) published an updated version of its Info Sheet 225 on Tuesday, clarifying how existing financial services laws apply to digital-asset businesses. The revised guidance marks a significant step in tightening regulatory supervision as Australia prepares to introduce the Treasury Laws Amendment (Regulating Digital Asset and Tokenised Custody Platforms) Bill 2025.

This comes as Australia’s cryptocurrency market shows signs of stagnation, with investors holding back amid anticipation of new digital-asset legislation despite a year of sweeping reforms. As previously reported by Cryptopolitan, crypto exchange Swyftx has released its fifth annual Australian Crypto Survey, revealing that adult ownership of digital assets has flatlined, and public trust in cryptocurrencies continues to decline.

Treasury and ASIC work together to prepare for new crypto licensing rules

The ASIC replaced the old term “crypto assets” with “digital assets” to make it easier for businesses to determine which rules apply to them and how to comply with them. This update is in line with the Australian Treasury’s new Digital Asset Platforms Bill and Payment Service Providers Bill.

The new bills will help introduce official licenses for crypto exchanges, stablecoin issuers, and custody service providers by 2026. In addition to the updated terms, the ASIC expanded the examples of financial products to illustrate how the current Corporations Act categorizes different digital assets.

The agency also introduced new sections to help businesses know how to handle client assets, risks, and transition smoothly into the new licensing system. The regulator stated that it aims to provide companies with sufficient time to prepare for the new laws while also protecting customers. However, they did make it clear that the examples and sections will not replace the law, but only guide companies.

With this new guidance, companies will understand how the current financial rules categorize their services and whether any of them require an Australian Financial Services (AFS) licence.

ASIC tightens custodial standards and extends Australian law to offshore crypto services

The ASIC stated that some companies would intentionally attempt to circumvent the laws because they believe the laws don’t fully apply to them, as they are based outside the country. The agency warned that these excuses will no longer be effective, as every company that reaches Australian customers in some way or another must comply with the laws. 

Companies must now hold at least A$10 million ($6.5 million) in net tangible assets, unless their custody role is very small or secondary to another service. The Regulatory Guide 166 also has the same requirements for traditional custodians.

To help companies adopt the new regulatory system easily, the ASIC stated that skilled individuals who have worked in cryptocurrency or blockchain can qualify as responsible managers under the Australian Financial Services (AFS) licence, even if they do not have a traditional finance background.

The company also plans to give “no-action” relief to companies working to get full authorization but have not yet completed the process (as long as they continue to follow strong consumer-protection practices).

Fund managers and exchange-traded product (ETP) issuers must also comply with the strict laws outlined in Chapter 5C of the Corporations Act. They should disclose to investors the assets they hold, where those assets are stored, and the specific risks investors face when purchasing crypto-linked products.

The agency stated that it aims to prevent firms from promoting digital asset investments without disclosing to investors how funds are managed or what risks may arise.

The ASIC also discussed decentralized finance (DeFi), but didn’t provide a single definition because the products are diverse. Instead, the regulator will evaluate each project to determine whether the exchanges or brokers are providing services that require a license. 

The agency will collaborate with other local regulators to develop new laws governing these digital asset companies. Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulino said these updates will create clear and secure laws that will support innovation instead of blocking new technologies. 

Sharpen your strategy with mentorship + daily ideas - 30 days free access to our trading program

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

The post Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from the 0xResearch newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe. One of the key things I like to track in crypto is a subjective criterion I call “where are new interesting developments and proposals taking place.” There are plenty of dashboards and analytics sites for this, the most popular being the Electric Capital site. The issue is that it still shows Polkadot as having a lot of developers. (At Blockworks we solved the noise problem with active users; maybe we can try the same for active developers.) Because of this noise, I prefer to track two simple observations: What is the velocity of new products launching, and how much mindshare are these products capturing? Are many people getting nerdsniped into discussing the novelties and intricacies of the chain? A related point is the caliber of people being attracted to new ecosystems. For example, over the past few years, Solana (and Ethereum) attracted the majority of talent. Talent generally goes where: It can solve interesting problems or create interesting projects. It can make a lot of money. In a podcast I did with Icebergy about a year ago, we discussed how crypto still wasn’t attracting talent at the levels AI was, despite offering faster exits and more money. AI was (and probably still is) more interesting to most talent and seen as more prestigious. After FTX, crypto lost a lot of credibility and has only recently started recovering as larger institutional players re-entered. Apart from FTX, crypto has also been criticized for being full of low-effort forks and limited utility products. This dynamic isn’t unique to crypto though. Many AI companies are also just building wrappers around GPT, which is as uninteresting as some projects in crypto. Anyway, to the point: Historically, Solana has captured the majority of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:13
Dubizzle Pauses IPO After Strong 75% Revenue Growth, Eyes Right Market Moment

Dubizzle Pauses IPO After Strong 75% Revenue Growth, Eyes Right Market Moment

The decision by Dubizzle to delay its IPO highlights a new phase of maturity for Gulf capital markets.
Share
Crypto Breaking News2025/10/29 17:35