Ankr says its RPC platform now processes over 1 trillion requests per month across 80+ chains, powering wallets, dApps, MEV systems and other Web3 services.Ankr says its RPC platform now processes over 1 trillion requests per month across 80+ chains, powering wallets, dApps, MEV systems and other Web3 services.

Ankr’s RPC Network Surpasses 1 Trillion Monthly Requests Across 80+ Chains

2025/09/25 03:00
blockchain-integration-web3

Ankr, a major Web3 infrastructure provider, announced this week that its RPC platform now processes more than 1 trillion requests per month, a milestone that underlines just how much of blockchain activity runs through centralized infrastructure even as apps try to decentralize. The company framed the milestone not as a marketing puff, but as a snapshot of everyday traffic: everything from balance checks to rollup calls and MEV bot pulls.

Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs) are the read/write plumbing of blockchains, the API layer between wallets, dApps and the node fleets that actually hold state. According to Ankr, the largest slices of that trillion-request pie come from wallets and frontends, indexers and analytics services, bots and MEV systems, rollups/L2s and bridges (which generate lots of cross-chain calls), and a long tail of smaller dApps across more than 80 networks.

Those everyday calls include frequent read methods, like eth_call, eth_getBalance and eth_getBlockByNumber, with heavier range and log queries (eth_getLogs), tracing/debug calls, websocket subscriptions for new heads and pending transactions, and a smaller but mission-critical volume of writes such as eth_sendRawTransaction.

What Does it Mean?

Reaching a trillion monthly requests forces trade-offs: reliability, latency and cost all matter when apps depend on on-chain data. Ankr says it addresses those pressures with a mix of network and software engineering: global anycast and regional routing to cut latency, blockchain-aware load balancing, specialized fleets (separating hot reads from archive and trace/debug/ write paths), rate shaping and method-weighted failover logic, plus bespoke infrastructure for enterprise customers with very high throughput. The result, the company argues, is an RPC layer that can handle both the routine, a wallet checking an account balance, and the bursty, a rollup or MEV system hammering endpoints.

For developers, Ankr’s message is practical: you’ll see the best performance if you design your apps to be polite to RPCs. That means using caching, batching calls, pinning traffic to regions, respecting method weights, and monitoring usage by chain and method. In short, optimize how you ask for data as much as where you get it.

Why does this matter? RPCs are the invisible choke points that can make or break user experience. No balance reads, no swaps; no reliable subscriptions, no real-time UX. As more users and services flock to L2s, bridges and multi-chain wallets, the volume and complexity of RPC traffic grow, and with it the need for scalable, resilient infrastructure. Ankr’s trillion-request claim is therefore less a trophy and more a metric of how much of Web3 currently depends on a handful of infrastructure providers.

Ankr’s full thread and breakdown of traffic types is available on their official post. Developers building on Web3 would do well to treat RPCs as a core part of architecture planning, not an afterthought, because behind every smooth balance check or instant swap are thousands of tiny API calls that have to land and return in milliseconds.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

House Judiciary Rejects Vote To Subpoena Banks CEOs For Epstein Case

House Judiciary Rejects Vote To Subpoena Banks CEOs For Epstein Case

The post House Judiciary Rejects Vote To Subpoena Banks CEOs For Epstein Case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline House Judiciary Committee Republicans blocked a Democrat effort Wednesday to subpoena a group of major banks as part of a renewed investigation into late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s financial ties. Congressman Jim Jordan, R-OH, is the chairman of the committee. (Photo by Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images) Anadolu via Getty Images Key Facts A near party-line vote squashed the effort to vote on a subpoena, with Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., who is leading a separate effort to force the Justice Department to release more Epstein case materials, voting alongside Democrats. The vote, if successful, would have resulted in the issuing of subpoenas to JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan, Deutsche Bank CEO Christian Sewing and Bank of New York Mellon CEO Robin Vince. The subpoenas would have specifically looked into multiple reports that claimed the four banks flagged $1.5 billion in suspicious transactions linked to Epstein. The failed effort from Democrats followed an FBI oversight hearing in which agency director Kash Patel misleadingly claimed the FBI cannot release many of the files it has on Epstein. Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We’re launching text message alerts so you’ll always know the biggest stories shaping the day’s headlines. Text “Alerts” to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here. Crucial Quote Dimon, who attended a lunch with Senate Republicans before the vote, according to Politico, told reporters, “We regret any association with that man at all. And, of course, if it’s a legal requirement, we would conform to it. We have no issue with that.” Chief Critic “Republicans had the chance to subpoena the CEOs of JPMorgan, Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of New York Mellon to expose Epstein’s money trail,” the House Judiciary Democrats said in a tweet. “Instead, they tried to bury…
Share
2025/09/18 08:02
Share