The post AEW’s Family Friendly Product A Farce At All Out 2025 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Tony Khan claims AEW is a family friendly product. AEW AEW President and CEO Tony Khan claims All Elite Wrestling is a product for ladies, gentleman, boys, girls and children of all ages. Tony Khan is lying. During Thursday’s media call ahead of AEW All Out 2025, Khan boasted the secondary promotion as a family friendly alternative to WWE. The well-timed quote was a veiled shot at WWE, particularly TKO COO Mark Shapiro, who recently commented on WWE’s high ticket prices by suggesting they will continue to climb. Shapiro noted former WWE Chairman Vince McMahon “priced for families,” which capped the promotion’s ticket revenue since pricing for families tends to be more affordable. “We know we have a lot of room there because Vince McMahon was primarily pricing tickets for families and wasn’t totally focused on maxing the opportunity there,” said Shapiro to TKO investors on a conference call. “Now that we’ve seen what we can do with UFC, we’re replicating that in terms of ticket yield and holding back and advance sales when it comes to OnLocation on the WWE side and it’s working out really well.” Tony Khan Falsely Claims AEW Is A Family Friendly Product Tony Khan fielded a similar question about family friendly pricing, but instead of answering the question truthfully, he simply lied about AEW’s product and its intended audience. “AEW’s ticket pricing is designed to be very family-friendly,” said Khan. “And it has been from the very beginning. Everyone involved with AEW from the beginning will tell you that we’ve always wanted to maintain affordable ticket pricing for the fans, in particular to bring families and young fans to the show and make it accessible for fans of all backgrounds, of all ages. I think it’s really exciting for us that we’re getting really… The post AEW’s Family Friendly Product A Farce At All Out 2025 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Tony Khan claims AEW is a family friendly product. AEW AEW President and CEO Tony Khan claims All Elite Wrestling is a product for ladies, gentleman, boys, girls and children of all ages. Tony Khan is lying. During Thursday’s media call ahead of AEW All Out 2025, Khan boasted the secondary promotion as a family friendly alternative to WWE. The well-timed quote was a veiled shot at WWE, particularly TKO COO Mark Shapiro, who recently commented on WWE’s high ticket prices by suggesting they will continue to climb. Shapiro noted former WWE Chairman Vince McMahon “priced for families,” which capped the promotion’s ticket revenue since pricing for families tends to be more affordable. “We know we have a lot of room there because Vince McMahon was primarily pricing tickets for families and wasn’t totally focused on maxing the opportunity there,” said Shapiro to TKO investors on a conference call. “Now that we’ve seen what we can do with UFC, we’re replicating that in terms of ticket yield and holding back and advance sales when it comes to OnLocation on the WWE side and it’s working out really well.” Tony Khan Falsely Claims AEW Is A Family Friendly Product Tony Khan fielded a similar question about family friendly pricing, but instead of answering the question truthfully, he simply lied about AEW’s product and its intended audience. “AEW’s ticket pricing is designed to be very family-friendly,” said Khan. “And it has been from the very beginning. Everyone involved with AEW from the beginning will tell you that we’ve always wanted to maintain affordable ticket pricing for the fans, in particular to bring families and young fans to the show and make it accessible for fans of all backgrounds, of all ages. I think it’s really exciting for us that we’re getting really…

AEW’s Family Friendly Product A Farce At All Out 2025

2025/09/21 23:31

Tony Khan claims AEW is a family friendly product.

AEW

AEW President and CEO Tony Khan claims All Elite Wrestling is a product for ladies, gentleman, boys, girls and children of all ages.

Tony Khan is lying.

During Thursday’s media call ahead of AEW All Out 2025, Khan boasted the secondary promotion as a family friendly alternative to WWE. The well-timed quote was a veiled shot at WWE, particularly TKO COO Mark Shapiro, who recently commented on WWE’s high ticket prices by suggesting they will continue to climb. Shapiro noted former WWE Chairman Vince McMahon “priced for families,” which capped the promotion’s ticket revenue since pricing for families tends to be more affordable.

“We know we have a lot of room there because Vince McMahon was primarily pricing tickets for families and wasn’t totally focused on maxing the opportunity there,” said Shapiro to TKO investors on a conference call. “Now that we’ve seen what we can do with UFC, we’re replicating that in terms of ticket yield and holding back and advance sales when it comes to OnLocation on the WWE side and it’s working out really well.”

Tony Khan Falsely Claims AEW Is A Family Friendly Product

Tony Khan fielded a similar question about family friendly pricing, but instead of answering the question truthfully, he simply lied about AEW’s product and its intended audience.

“AEW’s ticket pricing is designed to be very family-friendly,” said Khan. “And it has been from the very beginning. Everyone involved with AEW from the beginning will tell you that we’ve always wanted to maintain affordable ticket pricing for the fans, in particular to bring families and young fans to the show and make it accessible for fans of all backgrounds, of all ages. I think it’s really exciting for us that we’re getting really good feedback about that.”

AEW All Out 2025 emanated from Toronto’s Scotiabank Arena. The pay-per-view distributed just over 12,000 tickets, with an average ticket price of $52 CAD, or $38 USD.

AEW has been a TV-14 product since its inception. One of its hallmark matches is called “Blood and Guts.” It’s a stipulation cage match created in direct response to former WWE Chairman Vince McMahon, who criticized AEW for being too violent. In AEW, particularly on PPV, there’s almost as much blood as there are belts.

Nobody thinks AEW is family friendly programming. Not even AEW wrestler Ricochet, who has reinvented himself in 2025 as an online sycophantic troll. The zero-time champion in AEW echoed Khan’s comments of family friendly prices before taking to Twitter to clarify that AEW was not, in fact, a family friendly product.

“Actually [what] I said is families can afford to come to our shows. Not that we are ‘family friendly’ you f—king dumbass,” Ricochet said in response to a Tweet.

But maybe Tony Khan was turning over a new leaf, starting with All Out: Toronto. Maybe Tony Khan saw WWE’s high-priced product as a chance to create a more wholesome product that appealed to the families who are being alienated by WWE’s rising ticket prices.

Or maybe Tony Khan was just being a carny. Maybe Khan found an opportunity to weaponize Mark Shapiro’s comments against him by lying about AEW’s content. Because throughout AEW All Out 2025, AEW went out of its way to emphasize that this was far from a family friendly product.

AEW All Out 2025 Delivers A Violent, Bloody PPV

Three matches into a five-hour show, MJF loaded Marc Briscoe’s mouth with thumbtacks like a redneck coin machine. Both pros wore white to a Tables ‘n’ Tacks match because like a 2007 western movie, there would be blood. MJF and Briscoe bled profusely in a match where Briscoe finally prevailed, exacting revenge over MJF’s family friendly comments about Jay Briscoe’s (Marc’s brother) real-life death.

In a 20-minute coffin match, Darby Allin mutilated Jon Moxley by skewering him with a fork. Staying true to form, Mox bled from his ear and head after several violent jabs from Allin. At one point, Darby unveiled a plastic bag and used it to suffocate Moxley, creating a family friendly visual where the clear plastic bag was smeared with bright red blood. This, of course, was a callback to Moxley’s suffocation of Bryan Danielson at WrestleDream 2024. Plastic bag suffocation was not a one-off spot on an afternoon PPV.

It’s part of AEW lore.

Moxley won thanks to help from PAC, who rejoined Jon’s skinhead-adjacent stable the Death Riders (I hear families love skinheads.) Later on in the night, Allin escaped the coffin and got the better of Moxley in a backstage brawl. Allin encased Moxley in a bodybag and literally set him on fire.

You know? For the families.

After promoting AEW as a “family friendly product” designed to appeal to families and young fans,” AEW All Out put forth a TV-14 product bordering on TV-MA. There were literally chants of “This is murder” during the peak of Moxley vs. Allin. Exactly what family is AEW trying to appeal to? The Manson Family or the Adams Family? Tony Khan promoting AEW as a family friendly product is like the MPAA assigning a G-rating to Django Unchained.

I enjoy AEW as a more adult-oriented alternative to WWE. This is how WCW found success in the ‘90s with WCW Nitro. I have no personal problem with a more violent, edgy pro wrestling product. WWE’s mainstream TV-PG product, ironically, is designed to appeal to a broader, family audience. As long as that’s the case, there will always be a place for wrestling promotions willing to push the envelope. Two of AEW’s biggest matches on All Out did just that. And it was about as family friendly as the comment section on an adult website.

During the famed Attitude Era, WWE used edginess to increase ratings. Vince McMahon came under fire from activists, reporters and family organizations for cultivating a violent, sexually charged product that appealed to children. In response, McMahon’s strategy was not to lie like Tony Khan and invite families to his show. Vince actually (and defiantly) told concerned parents not to watch WWE.

“We wholeheartedly would want parents and everyone to exercise their freedom of choice. Damn it, it is America. Go live in your world. Don’t like us. Click us off! Don’t watch us,” said McMahon in an old interview that resurfaced on 2024’s Mr. McMahon documentary.

Even when McMahon was lying, he was still more honest about his product than Tony Khan. “[WWE was] still family friendly,” said McMahon of the Attitude Era. “But maybe for a more adult family. Not for young kids.”

ForbesAEW All Out 2025 Results, Winners And Match Grades On September 20

Tony Khan Surrounds Himself With AEW-Friendly Media

Khan faced no push back about his contradictory comments during All Out’s media scrum. This is wholly by design. In an era where authoritarianism and censorship are threatening free speech, this national issue has trickled down to sports media—particularly combat sports media. These days, more authority figures in combat sports are surrounding themselves with friendly media less likely to challenge them, while alienating critics willing to ask real questions. This was a topic of controversy during last weekend’s superfight between Canelo Alvarez and Terrance Crawford, where multiple high-profile boxing reporters were denied their credentials.

“TKO, when it comes to [wrestling media] has not credentialed a lot of people of late based on dissenting viewpoints,” said Dave Meltzer on Wrestling Observer Radio. “In boxing, essentially the feeling is that—people who have any dissenting viewpoints with Turki [Alalshikh]—you’re not going to get credentialed for any of these fights.”

Meltzer is a vocal critic of combat sports promoters denying media credentials due to dissenting views.

Unless that promoter is Tony Khan.

Meltzer is one of the chosen few members of the AEW softball media who is allowed access to the promotion’s low-rent media scrums. The scrums have faced scrutiny from fans and media, and often go viral for horrible questions, and in some cases, no questions at all.

Khan is an avid reader of Meltzer’s Wrestling Observer Newsletter, and fashions his product in Meltzer’s vision. As of this writing, sixth-year promotion AEW has been awarded 53 five-star matches. It’s a meaningless accolade that only exists to notify a niche audience that Dave Meltzer enjoyed a sequence of dangerous wrestling moves. In the 43 years of Meltzer’s star ratings, WWE has 24 five-star matches. Meltzer and Khan’s viewpoints couldn’t be any more aligned. As a pro-AEW reporter, Meltzer went radio silent about Tony Khan’s reluctance to allow his critics into media scrums. And as a petty promoter who has no time for critics with dissenting opinions, Khan is no better than Turki Alalshikh or TKO.

When it comes to inviting real media to his media scrums, Tony Khan runs from his critics faster than he ran from Wrestlepalooza when they took over his timeslot. Tony Khan turns every media scrum into an echo chamber. And as long as Khan enjoys the privileges of alienating his harshest critics, he will be able to lie about AEW being a a family friendly product with no pushback, whatsoever.

AEW All Out 2025 Results

  • Cage and Cope (-1500) def. FTR (+1200)
  • Eddie Kingston def. Big Bill
  • Marc Briscoe def. MJF | Tables ‘n’ Tacks Match
  • Ricochet and the Gates of Agony (-250) def. The Hurt Syndicate (+170)
  • Mercedes Mone (-2000) def. Riho (+700) | AEW TBS Title
  • Kazuchika Okada def. Konosuke Takeshita and Mascara Dorada | AEW Unified Title
  • Jon Moxley (+275) def. Darby Allin (-450) | Coffin Match
  • Kris Statlander (+600) def. Toni Storm (-2000), Jamie Hayter (+1000) and Thekla (+500) | AEW Women’s World Title
  • Brodito def. the Young Bucks vs. JetSpeed vs. the Don Callis Family | Fatal 4-Way Match for the AEW Tag Team Championships
  • Hangman Adam Page (-5000) def. Kyle Fletcher (+1200) | AEW World Heavyweight Title

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alfredkonuwa/2025/09/21/aews-family-friendly-product-a-farce-at-all-out-2025/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders

Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders

BitcoinWorld Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders The dynamic world of decentralized finance (DeFi) is constantly evolving, bringing forth new opportunities and innovations. A significant development is currently unfolding at Curve Finance, a leading decentralized exchange (DEX). Its founder, Michael Egorov, has put forth an exciting proposal designed to offer a more direct path for token holders to earn revenue. This initiative, centered around a new Curve Finance revenue sharing model, aims to bolster the value for those actively participating in the protocol’s governance. What is the “Yield Basis” Proposal and How Does it Work? At the core of this forward-thinking initiative is a new protocol dubbed Yield Basis. Michael Egorov introduced this concept on the CurveDAO governance forum, outlining a mechanism to distribute sustainable profits directly to CRV holders. Specifically, it targets those who stake their CRV tokens to gain veCRV, which are essential for governance participation within the Curve ecosystem. Let’s break down the initial steps of this innovative proposal: crvUSD Issuance: Before the Yield Basis protocol goes live, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued. Strategic Fund Allocation: The funds generated from the sale of these crvUSD tokens will be strategically deployed into three distinct Bitcoin-based liquidity pools: WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC. Pool Capping: To ensure balanced risk and diversified exposure, each of these pools will be capped at $10 million. This carefully designed structure aims to establish a robust and consistent income stream, forming the bedrock of a sustainable Curve Finance revenue sharing mechanism. Why is This Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Significant for CRV Holders? This proposal marks a pivotal moment for CRV holders, particularly those dedicated to the long-term health and governance of Curve Finance. Historically, generating revenue for token holders in the DeFi space can often be complex. The Yield Basis proposal simplifies this by offering a more direct and transparent pathway to earnings. By staking CRV for veCRV, holders are not merely engaging in governance; they are now directly positioned to benefit from the protocol’s overall success. The significance of this development is multifaceted: Direct Profit Distribution: veCRV holders are set to receive a substantial share of the profits generated by the Yield Basis protocol. Incentivized Governance: This direct financial incentive encourages more users to stake their CRV, which in turn strengthens the protocol’s decentralized governance structure. Enhanced Value Proposition: The promise of sustainable revenue sharing could significantly boost the inherent value of holding and staking CRV tokens. Ultimately, this move underscores Curve Finance’s dedication to rewarding its committed community and ensuring the long-term vitality of its ecosystem through effective Curve Finance revenue sharing. Understanding the Mechanics: Profit Distribution and Ecosystem Support The distribution model for Yield Basis has been thoughtfully crafted to strike a balance between rewarding veCRV holders and supporting the wider Curve ecosystem. Under the terms of the proposal, a substantial portion of the value generated by Yield Basis will flow back to those who contribute to the protocol’s governance. Returns for veCRV Holders: A significant share, specifically between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis, will be distributed to veCRV holders. This flexible range allows for dynamic adjustments based on market conditions and the protocol’s performance. Ecosystem Reserve: Crucially, 25% of the Yield Basis tokens will be reserved exclusively for the Curve ecosystem. This allocation can be utilized for various strategic purposes, such as funding ongoing development, issuing grants, or further incentivizing liquidity providers. This ensures the continuous growth and innovation of the platform. The proposal is currently undergoing a democratic vote on the CurveDAO governance forum, giving the community a direct voice in shaping the future of Curve Finance revenue sharing. The voting period is scheduled to conclude on September 24th. What’s Next for Curve Finance and CRV Holders? The proposed Yield Basis protocol represents a pioneering approach to sustainable revenue generation and community incentivization within the DeFi landscape. If approved by the community, this Curve Finance revenue sharing model has the potential to establish a new benchmark for how decentralized exchanges reward their most dedicated participants. It aims to foster a more robust and engaged community by directly linking governance participation with tangible financial benefits. This strategic move by Michael Egorov and the Curve Finance team highlights a strong commitment to innovation and strengthening the decentralized nature of the protocol. For CRV holders, a thorough understanding of this proposal is crucial for making informed decisions regarding their staking strategies and overall engagement with one of DeFi’s foundational platforms. FAQs about Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Q1: What is the main goal of the Yield Basis proposal? A1: The primary goal is to establish a more direct and sustainable way for CRV token holders who stake their tokens (receiving veCRV) to earn revenue from the Curve Finance protocol. Q2: How will funds be generated for the Yield Basis protocol? A2: Initially, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued and sold. The funds from this sale will then be allocated to three Bitcoin-based pools (WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC), with each pool capped at $10 million, to generate profits. Q3: Who benefits from the Yield Basis revenue sharing? A3: The proposal states that between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis will be returned to veCRV holders, who are CRV stakers participating in governance. Q4: What is the purpose of the 25% reserve for the Curve ecosystem? A4: This 25% reserve of Yield Basis tokens is intended to support the broader Curve ecosystem, potentially funding development, grants, or other initiatives that contribute to the platform’s growth and sustainability. Q5: When is the vote on the Yield Basis proposal? A5: A vote on the proposal is currently underway on the CurveDAO governance forum and is scheduled to run until September 24th. If you found this article insightful and valuable, please consider sharing it with your friends, colleagues, and followers on social media! Your support helps us continue to deliver important DeFi insights and analysis to a wider audience. To learn more about the latest DeFi market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping decentralized finance institutional adoption. This post Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
2025/09/18 00:35
Share