The most valuable assets in an economy are often the hardest to price. In the 1990s, the business world misjudged the Internet. This wasn’t a failure of imaginationThe most valuable assets in an economy are often the hardest to price. In the 1990s, the business world misjudged the Internet. This wasn’t a failure of imagination

Why Wall Street Can’t Price the Next Internet

The most valuable assets in an economy are often the hardest to price. In the 1990s, the business world misjudged the Internet. This wasn’t a failure of imagination; it was a failure of frameworks. Analysts tried to value the web by tallying up the revenues of companies like AOL and Netscape, missing the deeper significance of the open public infrastructure beneath them. The visible companies were easy to price. The invisible protocols powering them were not.

In those early days, the market could price a modem, but it couldn’t price the ability to send an email to anyone on earth for free.

Today, we are repeating that mistake with Ethereum.

Most investors understand Bitcoin, but they still categorize Ethereum as a cryptocurrency, a tech stock, or merely “one blockchain among many.” In reality, Ethereum is emerging as the next foundational layer of the Internet, this time not for information, but for value. And once again, the market is radically underestimating the utility of a public layer it cannot control.

To understand Ethereum’s economic significance, we must remember what the Internet actually did. It did not invent content or commerce; it created the open, neutral foundation that allowed anyone to build them. Its greatest contribution was permissionless innovation. Ethereum serves the same role, but in the economic realm. It makes value move the way the Internet made information move.

If the Internet produced universal communication, Ethereum produces universal economic coordination.

Quiet Infrastructure Just as no one thinks about TCP/IP when sending an email, few users think about Ethereum when using a stablecoin. Yet Ethereum quietly settles trillions of dollars annually. Stablecoins alone now move value at a volume that rivals traditional payment networks like Visa or Mastercard, and the vast majority of this liquidity relies on Ethereum’s architecture.

This is how network effects take hold: quietly, invisibly, beneath recognizable brands. In the 1990s, investors priced dot-com companies but barely understood the protocols that enabled the digital economy. Ethereum is trapped in this same narrative gap.

The core misunderstanding is simple: Ethereum is not a business. It has no CEO, no revenue maximization strategy, and no shareholders. It functions as a public good, more like a global settlement court or a digital electricity grid than a tech company.

Public infrastructure almost always looks undervalued in its early decades because it generates surplus rather than just revenue. The Internet’s protocols captured almost none of the trillions in value created on top of them. Electricity grids never captured the full value of the industrial economy they powered. Ethereum is the same: it enables far more economic activity than it directly monetizes.

This is why traditional metrics, fees, token price, and transaction counts are such poor indicators of Ethereum’s long-run importance. They measure the toll booth, not the economy.

The Trust Dividend Eventually, economists realized the Internet’s biggest impact wasn’t ad revenue, but consumer surplus, the enormous benefit users gained from open access. Ethereum offers a similar, yet unpriced, benefit: the “Trust Dividend.”

Because Ethereum settles transactions, validates ownership, and enforces agreements transparently and automatically, it collapses operational costs across finance and commerce. Everything from compliance to reconciliation to fraud management becomes cheaper when the underlying ledger is shared, standardized, and verifiable.

Businesses aren’t adopting Ethereum because they want to “use blockchain.” They are adopting it because it lowers friction. It introduces reliability. It reduces counterparty risk. It offers a global settlement environment that no competitor controls and no jurisdiction can unilaterally shut down.

This Trust Dividend,- the removal of the “middleman tax”, is where the real macro-level value lies.

The Settlement Layer for the Machine Age The global economy is becoming more digital, tokenized, and machine-driven. Major financial institutions are issuing tokenized funds, running digital treasuries, and using stablecoins for cross-border settlement. Perhaps most importantly, we are entering the age of AI agents, autonomous software that will need to transact. AI agents cannot open bank accounts. They will use the only permissionless, programmable settlement layer: Ethereum.

Just as the Internet created the conditions for modern communication, Ethereum is creating the conditions for programmable global value exchange. It is not competing with payment apps or banks. It is enabling an entirely new category of economic infrastructure.

It took decades for the world to understand the true value of the Internet’s public protocols. By the time the significance was clear, the transformation was already complete. Ethereum is following a similar trajectory, but with one key difference: this time, the infrastructure itself is investable.

The businesses and institutions that recognize Ethereum not as a speculative asset, but as the Internet’s settlement layer, will be the ones shaping the next era of digital business.

William Mougayar has 4 decades of experience in the tech industry and is the author of The Business Blockchain

Comments
Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.007461
$0.007461$0.007461
-3.00%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Zcash (ZEC) Price Prediction: ZEC Defends $300 Support as Bullish Structures and Privacy Narrative Return to Focus

Zcash (ZEC) Price Prediction: ZEC Defends $300 Support as Bullish Structures and Privacy Narrative Return to Focus

Zcash (ZEC) is holding above the crucial $300 support zone as price consolidates near $339, with traders watching key resistance levels and a potential bullish
Share
Brave New Coin2026/02/01 02:16
The 5000x Potential: BlockDAG Enters Its Final Hours at $0.0005 Before the Presale Ends

The 5000x Potential: BlockDAG Enters Its Final Hours at $0.0005 Before the Presale Ends

BlockDAG is one of the few projects offering a structured window rather than a surprise. The presale has already raised $452 million, and only hours remain to buy
Share
Techbullion2026/02/01 02:00
Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36