Ethereum derivatives markets have entered a zone historically associated with systemic stress, as funding rates on Binance collapsed to levels last seen during Ethereum derivatives markets have entered a zone historically associated with systemic stress, as funding rates on Binance collapsed to levels last seen during

Ethereum Funding Rates Sink to FTX-Era Extremes as Liquidations Accelerate

2026/02/01 15:57

Ethereum derivatives markets have entered a zone historically associated with systemic stress, as funding rates on Binance collapsed to levels last seen during the FTX collapse.

The move followed a sharp, liquidity-driven sell-off across crypto markets, triggered by rising geopolitical tensions between the United States and Iran and a broad risk-off shift across global assets.

At the intraday low, total crypto market capitalization fell by nearly $300 billion in a single session, extending cumulative losses to roughly $470 billion over three days. This rapid repricing mechanically set off cascading liquidations across derivatives venues, with more than $2.5 billion in positions wiped out, including approximately $1.1 billion in Ethereum liquidations alone.

Liquidations, Not Spot Selling, Drove the Move

The decline was not primarily driven by discretionary spot selling. Instead, it reflected a forced unwind of leverage. As prices moved through thin liquidity zones, long positions were automatically closed, executing as market orders and amplifying downside momentum.

This dynamic created a sharp imbalance between Ethereum’s spot and perpetual markets. ETH perpetual contracts traded at a meaningful discount to spot, signaling excess selling pressure concentrated in derivatives rather than in underlying demand.

To restore equilibrium between the two markets, funding rates were forced to adjust aggressively.

Funding Rates Signal Extreme Stress

On Binance, ETH funding rates flipped deeply negative, reaching approximately -0.028%, an extreme reading that has historically appeared only during periods of severe market dislocation. Comparable levels were last observed during the FTX collapse, a phase characterized by systemic panic, counterparty risk, and widespread forced liquidations.

The stress was not isolated to Ethereum. Aggregated funding rates across major exchanges fell to roughly -0.078, highlighting broad-based pessimism in derivatives positioning across the crypto market.

Negative funding rates indicate that short sellers are paying a premium to maintain positions, reflecting an overcrowded bearish trade rather than balanced two-sided activity.

Which Crypto Exchanges Dominated Spot Trading in 2025?

What Extreme Funding Does, and Does Not Signal

Historically, deeply negative funding rates have often coincided with late-stage liquidation events. They suggest excessive pessimism and one-sided positioning in derivatives markets. However, they are not, by themselves, a confirmation of a market bottom.

In past cycles, similar conditions sometimes preceded relief rallies — but only once external stress factors eased and liquidity stabilized. In the current environment, geopolitical uncertainty and constrained liquidity continue to dominate market behavior.

As long as these pressures persist, funding extremes should be interpreted as evidence of a cleansing phase, not a confirmed transition into recovery.

Structural Takeaway

The current episode reinforces a recurring theme in crypto market drawdowns:
price damage is often driven less by changes in fundamentals and more by leverage interacting with liquidity.

Until liquidation pressure subsides and funding rates normalize, Ethereum and the broader crypto market remain in a phase of forced adjustment rather than rebuilding. Confirmation of stabilization will require time, improved liquidity conditions, and a clear reduction in systemic risk drivers.

The post Ethereum Funding Rates Sink to FTX-Era Extremes as Liquidations Accelerate appeared first on ETHNews.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.