OKX CEO blamed Binance’s USDe campaign and collateral rules for the October 10 crash Critics disputed the timeline, saying Bitcoin fell before USDe moved on BinanceOKX CEO blamed Binance’s USDe campaign and collateral rules for the October 10 crash Critics disputed the timeline, saying Bitcoin fell before USDe moved on Binance

Inside the OKX-Binance Clash Over the October 10 Liquidation Spiral

  • OKX CEO blamed Binance’s USDe campaign and collateral rules for the October 10 crash
  • Critics disputed the timeline, saying Bitcoin fell before USDe moved on Binance
  • API outages and broader market stress worsened price dislocations during the selloff

The October 10 crypto market crash remains disputed as exchange leaders offer differing explanations. OKX and Binance now present opposing views. The debate centers on risk controls, timing, and market structure during the selloff.

OKX CEO Blames Marketing and Risk Structure

OKX CEO Star said the October 10 event was not accidental. He stated it was driven by “irresponsible marketing” tied to USDe. His comments were made months after the crash.

According to Star, Binance launched a temporary campaign offering 12% APY on USDe. At the same time, USDe was treated like major stablecoins. It was accepted as collateral without strict limits.

Star said USDe differs from traditional stablecoins. He described it as a tokenized hedge fund product from Ethena. He said marketing blurred this distinction for users.

Industry Debate Grows Over Exchange Risk Controls and Market Stability

According to Bitcoin News, OKX founder Star Xu said Binance’s leverage structure drove the October 10 market collapse. He described the event as a man-made crisis tied to aggressive growth tactics.

Star said Binance integrated USDe into its core systems and promoted it with a 12% APY campaign. He said Binance treated USDe like cash collateral, even though it is a synthetic dollar product.

He added that users looped USDe into leveraged trades, which inflated risk. When liquidations began, pricing failures caused a sharp depeg on Binance.

Critics Question Timing and Motives

Dragonfly founder Haseeb Qureshi challenged OKX’s account. He said the timeline does not support the claim. Bitcoin prices bottomed before USDe moved on Binance.

Qureshi said cause and effect did not align. He stated, “This story is ridiculous.” He also questioned why the issue surfaced months later.

Qureshi noted that market data had been public for months. Order books were widely reviewed after the crash. He suggested the comments may reflect a broader dispute.

Broader Market Stress and Open Questions

Other factors affected markets that day. Reports of tariff threats from former President Donald Trump added pressure. Crypto markets were open while others were closed.

At the same time, Binance APIs experienced outages. Market makers could not rebalance positions. Price gaps widened across trading pairs.

No single explanation has resolved the October 10 crash. Market participants agree losses were severe. The event continues to raise questions about risk management.

The post Inside the OKX-Binance Clash Over the October 10 Liquidation Spiral appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
This is How Dogecoin Holders Responded After the Market Crash

This is How Dogecoin Holders Responded After the Market Crash

The post This is How Dogecoin Holders Responded After the Market Crash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Dogecoin price dropped sharply over the past several
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/02 03:58
Shiba Inu Price Prediction: How High Can SHIB Go by the End of 2026?

Shiba Inu Price Prediction: How High Can SHIB Go by the End of 2026?

Shiba Inu is back in the conversation, and the talk isn’t all about the recent price action. After the broader market took a hit, the SHIB price slid from around
Share
Captainaltcoin2026/02/02 04:30