Upexi files a $1B shelf to flexibly scale its Solana treasury strategy. The company now holds about 2M SOL, ranking fourth among public companies. The company aimsUpexi files a $1B shelf to flexibly scale its Solana treasury strategy. The company now holds about 2M SOL, ranking fourth among public companies. The company aims

Upexi bets big on Solana treasury strategy with $1B shelf filing

  • Upexi files a $1B shelf to flexibly scale its Solana treasury strategy.
  • The company now holds about 2M SOL, ranking fourth among public companies.
  • The company aims to raise capital only when it boosts SOL per share.

Upexi has filed a $1 billion shelf registration with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), signalling a long-term commitment to building one of the largest Solana (SOL) digital asset treasuries among public companies, even as crypto markets remain under pressure.

Particularly, the filing comes at a fragile moment for both Solana and crypto-linked equities.

A flexible war chest takes shape

Upexi’s Form S-3 shelf registration allows it to raise up to $1 billion through a mix of common stock, preferred shares, debt securities, warrants, or bundled units.

The structure gives management discretion to issue capital over time rather than all at once, depending on market conditions.

The Nasdaq-listed company stressed that there is no fixed timetable for issuance.

Instead, offerings would be staged and supported by prospectus supplements that spell out terms and intended use.

Proceeds could fund working capital, research and development, acquisitions, capital expenditures, or debt repayment.

Alongside the filing, Upexi announced plans to terminate its existing equity line of credit once the shelf becomes effective. That credit facility has never been used.

The company’s management framed the decision as a shift toward more efficient capital access with better control over pricing and timing, while reducing transaction costs.

Despite carrying a notable debt load, with a debt-to-equity ratio near 0.95, Upexi maintains strong near-term liquidity.

Its current ratio stands around 3.4, indicating that liquid assets comfortably exceed short-term obligations.

The company has also said any use of the shelf would be pursued only if accretive to adjusted Solana per share.

From consumer brands to crypto treasury

Based in Tampa, Florida, Upexi manages consumer brands such as Cure Mushrooms and Lucky Tail pet care products.

However, over the past year, Upexi’s identity has increasingly shifted toward digital assets.

In January, Upexi formally launched its Solana digital asset treasury strategy.

Since then, it has accumulated roughly 2.0 to 2.03 million SOL tokens, placing it among the top four Solana holders disclosed by US-listed companies.

At current prices, those holdings are valued near $250 million.

Notably, the pace of accumulation was fastest in the second half of 2025, when Upexi aggressively added to its position.

At its peak, the SOL treasury was worth more than $500 million before a sharp correction in Solana’s price later in the year cut that value roughly in half.

And rather than retreat, Upexi’s latest filing suggests renewed conviction.

The company has described Solana as a long-term treasury asset, not a trading position.

Its strategy includes acquiring SOL, holding it on the balance sheet, staking for yield, and pursuing discounted locked-token purchases when available.

In the stock market, Upexi shares have struggled alongside the broader crypto equity space.

The Upexi stock price has fallen more than 50% year-to-date and currently trades around $1.80 to $2.00, down sharply from a May peak above $22.

In addition, the company’s market capitalisation hovers near $115 million, well below the notional value of its SOL holdings at higher prices.

Moving forward, investors will be watching how Upexi balances dilution risk against its ambition to scale a Solana treasury, and whether future capital raises truly enhance SOL exposure on a per-share basis.

The post Upexi bets big on Solana treasury strategy with $1B shelf filing appeared first on CoinJournal.

Market Opportunity
BIG Logo
BIG Price(BIG)
$0.00005225
$0.00005225$0.00005225
-3.65%
USD
BIG (BIG) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Egypt to invite investors for projects in ‘golden triangle’

Egypt to invite investors for projects in ‘golden triangle’

Egypt is preparing a list of projects to show potential investors in its promising “golden triangle” area, home to nearly half the Arab country’s gold deposits.
Share
Agbi2025/12/25 04:09
OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

PANews reported on September 17th that on-chain sleuth ZachXBT tweeted that OpenVPP ( $OVPP ) announced this week that it was collaborating with the US government to advance energy tokenization. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce subsequently responded, stating that the company does not collaborate with or endorse any private crypto projects. The OpenVPP team subsequently hid the response. Several crypto influencers have participated in promoting the project, and the accounts involved have been questioned as typical influencer accounts.
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:58