Buy Crypto
Markets
Spot
FuturesBTC
Earn
Event Center
Rewards Hub
More
100%+ PoR
Overview The core formula to calculate a Bitcoin (BTC) perpetual futures liquidation price in isolated USDT-margined mode is: a long position liquidates at Entry Price multiplied by (1 minus 1 dividedOverview The core formula to calculate a Bitcoin (BTC) perpetual futures liquidation price in isolated USDT-margined mode is: a long position liquidates at Entry Price multiplied by (1 minus 1 divided

Bitcoin Liquidation Price Calculator: Estimate Leverage Risk Before You Trade

Overview

 
The core formula to calculate a Bitcoin (BTC) perpetual futures liquidation price in isolated USDT-margined mode is: a long position liquidates at Entry Price multiplied by (1 minus 1 divided by Leverage plus the Maintenance Margin Rate), while a short position liquidates at Entry Price multiplied by (1 plus 1 divided by Leverage minus the Maintenance Margin Rate). At a $75,000.00 BTC entry price with a 0.50% Maintenance Margin Rate (MMR), a 10x leveraged long triggers forced liquidation at $67,875.00 (withstanding a 9.50% or $7,125.00 drawdown), whereas a 50x leveraged long liquidates at $73,875.00 (tolerating only a 1.50% or $1,125.00 adverse move). That arithmetic was demonstrated across the market on November 8 and 9, 2026, when Bitcoin slipped below $74,000.00 to touch $73,708.00 and triggered $855.69 million in 24-hour crypto liquidations across more than 140,000 traders (with long positions accounting for 90.2% of the total), proving why traders must calculate maintenance margin thresholds, funding-fee decay, and collateral convexity before submitting a leveraged order.
 
 

Key Takeaways

 
A position's liquidation price is not the bankruptcy price where deposited margin hits zero; it is the mark-price threshold where remaining account equity falls to the exchange's minimum maintenance margin requirement plus estimated liquidation fees, prompting the risk engine to take over the position automatically. According to CoinGlass derivatives telemetry cited by the FinanceFeeds liquidation report and the TradingView market brief on November 9, 2026, Bitcoin's retreat from above $80,000.00 earlier in the week down to $73,708.00 on November 8 (before stabilizing near $74,240.21 at 10:00 UTC on November 9) wiped out $855.69 million in leveraged positions in 24 hours. High liquidation counts occur because the Maintenance Margin Rate creates a fixed floor that consumes a rising share of initial margin as leverage scales: at a 0.50% MMR, doubling leverage from 50x to 100x cuts a trader's price buffer not by half, but by two-thirds—from 1.50% ($1,125.00) down to 0.50% ($375.00). Furthermore, opening a 10x long on an inverse BTC-margined contract places the liquidation price at $68,493.15, which is $618.15 closer to entry than on a linear USDT-margined contract ($67,875.00) because the BTC collateral itself loses dollar value as spot prices fall. Combining the Bitcoin profit calculation formula with exact margin and liquidation calculation rules allows traders to size leverage so forced-exit levels stay outside normal intraday noise.
 

Exact BTC Liquidation Price Formulas for Linear USDT and Inverse Coin-Margined Contracts

 
Calculating an exact liquidation threshold requires distinguishing between linear stablecoin-margined contracts (settled in USDT or USDC) and inverse coin-margined contracts (collateralized in native BTC).
 
In a linear USDT-margined perpetual contract under isolated margin mode, a position is liquidated when its Margin Ratio reaches 100%—meaning Position Margin plus Unrealized P&L equals Maintenance Margin plus the liquidation fee. Defining entry price as $$P_$$, position quantity as $$$$ (in BTC), selected leverage as $$$$, Maintenance Margin Rate as $$MM$$ (typically 0.40% to 0.50% at the base risk tier), and any manually added extra margin as $$M_{add$$:
 
Initial Margin equals $$(P_0 \times Q) / $$, and Maintenance Margin equals $$(P_0 \times Q) \times MM$$. Solving for the mark price where remaining equity equals Maintenance Margin yields the standard isolated linear formulas:
 
For an isolated linear long position, Liquidation Price equals $$P_0 \times (1 - 1/L + MMR) - (M_{add} / Q$$. With zero extra margin added, this simplifies to Entry Price multiplied by $$(1 - 1/L + MMR$$.
 
For an isolated linear short position, Liquidation Price equals $$P_0 \times (1 + 1/L - MMR) + (M_{add} / Q$$. With zero extra margin added, this simplifies to Entry Price multiplied by $$(1 + 1/L - MMR$$.
 
In an inverse BTC-margined perpetual contract, the contract is denominated in USD but collateralized in BTC. Because the USD value of your BTC collateral shrinks during a price drop and expands during a rally, the liquidation formula is non-linear: an isolated inverse long liquidates at $$(P_0 \times L) / [L + 1 - (MMR \times L)$$, while an isolated inverse short liquidates at $$(P_0 \times L) / [L - 1 + (MMR \times L)$$.
 
Leverage Multiplier (L)
Initial Margin per 1 BTC ($75K Entry)
Maintenance Margin (at 0.50% MMR)
Long Bankruptcy Price (Zero Equity)
Isolated Linear Long Liquidation Price
Isolated Linear Short Liquidation Price
Maximum Adverse Move Before Long Liquidation (%)
3x Leverage
25,000.00 USDT
375.00 USDT
$50,000.00
$50,375.00
$99,625.00
32.83% ($24,625.00 buffer)
5x Leverage
15,000.00 USDT
375.00 USDT
$60,000.00
$60,375.00
$89,625.00
19.50% ($14,625.00 buffer)
10x Leverage
7,500.00 USDT
375.00 USDT
$67,500.00
$67,875.00
$82,125.00
9.50% ($7,125.00 buffer)
20x Leverage
3,750.00 USDT
375.00 USDT
$71,250.00
$71,625.00
$78,375.00
4.50% ($3,375.00 buffer)
50x Leverage
1,500.00 USDT
375.00 USDT
$73,500.00
$73,875.00
$76,125.00
1.50% ($1,125.00 buffer)
100x Leverage
750.00 USDT
375.00 USDT
$74,250.00
$74,625.00
$75,375.00
0.50% ($375.00 buffer)
 
The table above maps out exact liquidation and bankruptcy prices across six leverage tiers for a 1 BTC position opened at $75,000.00 with a 0.50% MMR.
 
Comparing the fourth and fifth columns illustrates the $375.00 spread between Bankruptcy Price and Liquidation Price. At 100x leverage, a trader deposits 750.00 USDT (1.00% of the $75,000.00 notional value) to open 1 BTC, while the exchange requires 375.00 USDT (0.50% of notional) in maintenance margin to keep the trade alive. As soon as Bitcoin dips 0.50% ($375.00) from $75,000.00 to $74,625.00, unrealized losses equal 375.00 USDT, reducing remaining equity to 375.00 USDT and driving the Margin Ratio to 100%. The automated liquidation engine immediately takes over at $74,625.00 and closes the position into the order book above the $74,250.00 bankruptcy price, transferring any residual margin after liquidation fees into the exchange insurance fund to cover extreme gap events.
 

Isolated vs. Cross Margin and Risk Limit Tiers: Why Two 10x Longs Liquidate Thousands of Dollars Apart

 
Two traders opening a 10x Bitcoin long at $75,000.00 at the exact same second can see estimated liquidation prices separated by more than $6,000.00 depending on four structural parameters: linear versus inverse collateral, isolated versus cross margin, manual margin additions, and position-size risk limit tiers.
 
While traditional derivatives exchanges overseen by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) enforce fixed dollar performance bonds per contract (as documented in CME Group margin rules), crypto perpetual exchanges and institutional options venues (such as the Deribit standard margin model updated in late 2026) scale the Maintenance Margin Rate upward across position-size tiers so that multi-million-dollar whale positions must maintain a wider liquidation buffer.
 
Position Structure (All Opened at $75,000 Entry and 10x Leverage)
Deposited Collateral and Extra Buffer
Applicable Maintenance Margin Rate (MMR)
Calculated Long Liquidation Price (USD)
Dollar and Percentage Distance from Entry
Risk Profile and Operational Behavior
Setup 1: Isolated Linear USDT Standard Long (1 BTC / $75K Notional)
7,500.00 USDT initial margin; 0 USDT added
Base Tier 0.50% (375.00 USDT maintenance)
$67,875.00
-$7,125.00 (-9.50%)
Caps maximum loss strictly at 7,500 USDT
Setup 2: Isolated Inverse BTC-Margined Long ($75K Notional)
0.10 BTC initial collateral (worth $7,500 at entry)
Base Tier 0.50% (settled in native BTC)
$68,493.15
-$6,506.85 (-8.68%)
Collateral devalues as BTC drops; liquidates $618.15 earlier than USDT long
Setup 3: Isolated Linear Long with Added Margin (1 BTC + 3,750 USDT)
7,500.00 USDT initial + 3,750.00 USDT added (11,250 USDT total)
Base Tier 0.50% (375.00 USDT maintenance)
$64,125.00
-$10,875.00 (-14.50%)
Lowers effective leverage to 6.67x and pushes liquidation down $3,750.00
Setup 4: Cross Margin Linear Long (1 BTC + 5,000 USDT Free Wallet Balance)
7,500.00 USDT position margin + 5,000.00 USDT available wallet balance
Base Tier 0.50% across 12,500 USDT total equity
$62,875.00
-$12,125.00 (-16.17%)
Uses free wallet balance to delay liquidation, but puts all 12,500 USDT at risk
Setup 5: Whale Tier Linear Long (100 BTC / $7.5M Notional at 10x)
750,000.00 USDT initial margin
Elevated Tier 2.50% MMR (187,500 USDT maintenance)
$69,375.00
-$5,625.00 (-7.50%)
Higher position-size tier raises MMR to 2.50%, pulling liquidation $1,500.00 closer
 
Three practical lessons stand out from comparing the five 10x setups in the matrix above:
 
First, inverse BTC-margined longs carry negative collateral convexity during selloffs (Setup 2 vs. Setup 1). Because 0.10 BTC of collateral worth $7,500.00 at entry shrinks to $6,849.32 when BTC falls to $68,493.15, an inverse 10x long runs out of maintenance equity $618.15 higher than a linear 10x USDT long ($68,493.15 versus $67,875.00). Conversely, an inverse 10x short liquidates at $82,872.93 compared with $82,125.00 for a linear USDT short, because rising BTC prices increase the dollar value of the short seller's BTC collateral.
 
Second, Cross Margin widens your buffer only by putting your entire futures wallet on the line (Setup 4). While sharing 5,000.00 USDT of unallocated wallet balance lowers a 1 BTC long's liquidation price from $67,875.00 to $62,875.00, any unrealized losses on concurrent Ether or altcoin cross-margin positions immediately drain that shared 5,000.00 USDT pool, pulling the Bitcoin liquidation price back up during market-wide drawdowns. Using Isolated Margin and manually adding a fixed buffer (Setup 3) achieves the same lower liquidation price while ring-fencing the rest of your account.
 
Third, your Maintenance Margin Rate is governed by your total position notional size, not your leverage slider (Setup 5). Scaling a 10x long from 1 BTC ($75,000.00) to 100 BTC ($7,500,000.00) moves the position into a higher risk limit tier. When the applicable MMR steps up from 0.50% to 2.50%, the required maintenance margin jumps to 2.50% of notional, pulling the 10x liquidation price up by $1,500.00 from $67,875.00 to $69,375.00 and shrinking the allowed drawdown from 9.50% to 7.50%.
 

Three Dynamic Variables That Shift Your Live Liquidation Price After Entry

 
A static calculator shows where your liquidation price sits at the millisecond of entry, but three live variables cause that threshold to drift over the life of a trade.
 
Dynamic Variable
Settlement or Update Cadence
Quantitative Impact on a 1 BTC ($75K, 10x Isolated Long)
Cumulative Drift Over 10 Days
Risk-Management Countermeasure
Perpetual Funding Rate Payments
Settled every 8 hours (00:00, 08:00, and 16:00 UTC daily)
Paying +0.02% per interval deducts 15.00 USDT every 8h (45.00 USDT/day)
Deducts 450.00 USDT over 10 days, pushing long liquidation up from $67,875 to $68,325.00
Monitor funding rates and replenish isolated margin during extended holds
Taker Entry Fees and Reserved Fee-to-Close
Deducted at fill; closing fee reserved inside margin calculation
A 0.05% taker fee deducts 37.50 USDT on entry and reserves ~35 USDT for exit
Reduces effective initial margin by ~72.50 USDT, shifting liquidation ~$72.50 closer at entry
Enter via 0.00% Maker limit orders to preserve 100% of initial margin
Composite Mark Price vs. Last Traded Price
Calculated in real time from spot index basket plus decaying basis
If futures Last Price wicks down $600 on a thin book while Spot Index drops $180
Liquidation triggers strictly on Mark Price, preventing isolated order-book wicks from liquidating the trade
Anchor all Stop-Loss orders to Mark Price rather than Last Traded Price
 
First is cumulative funding fee erosion. Perpetual futures settle funding payments between longs and shorts every eight hours. When funding is positive (for example, +0.020% per eight-hour interval during a bullish regime), a 1 BTC ($75,000.00) long pays 15.00 USDT every eight hours, or 45.00 USDT per day. If those funding payments are deducted from the position's margin balance over a ten-day swing trade, the position loses 450.00 USDT of collateral, causing its long liquidation price to creep upward by $450.00 from $67,875.00 to $68,325.00 without spot price moving a cent.
 
Second is commission drag on initial margin. Opening a $75,000.00 position via a market order on a platform charging a 0.05% taker fee immediately deducts 37.50 USDT and reserves an estimated closing fee, narrowing your margin cushion from the start. Executing on venues such as MEXC, which applies a 0.00% Maker fee and a 0.02% base Taker fee on BTCUSDT perpetuals, allows limit-order traders to enter with zero upfront commission deduction.
 
Third is the gap between Mark Price and Last Traded Price. Exchanges trigger liquidations using the composite Mark Price (derived from a weighted basket of major spot exchanges plus a decaying funding basis) rather than the perpetual contract's own Last Traded Price. While Mark Price liquidation protects you from isolated futures wicks, setting your manual Stop-Loss order to trigger on Last Price instead of Mark Price can cause a sudden futures wick to stop you out prematurely even when the underlying spot index never breached your level.
 

Aligning Your Liquidation Buffer with On-Chain Support, ETF Flows, and Miner Cost Floors

 
Calculating a liquidation price is only useful if that price sits safely outside the zones where normal market volatility and liquidation cascades occur. Cross-checking four market structure indicators before choosing a leverage multiple keeps your liquidation line out of harm's way:
 
First, place your stop-loss outside structural support zones and keep your liquidation price well beyond your stop. As detailed in the framework for identifying Bitcoin support and resistance zones, support and resistance are liquidity distributions spanning 1% to 2% of price ($750.00 to $1,500.00 at $75,000.00 BTC) rather than exact single-dollar lines, and on-chain cost-basis bands tracked by Glassnode—such as the Short-Term Holder Realized Price—frequently act as magnets for stop-runs before a reversal. BecauseCoinGlass liquidation heatmaps show that price accelerates through dense high-leverage clusters, any leverage setting above 25x (where the total buffer to liquidation is under 3.50%) places your forced-exit price right inside routine intraday wicks.
 
Second, account for thinner exchange spot float amplifying intraday wicks. Data from CryptoQuant analyzed in the Bitcoin exchange reserves data report shows that total BTC held across centralized exchanges sits near a multi-year low of roughly 2.68 million BTC (about 13% of circulating supply). A tighter readily sellable float does not prevent drawdowns; instead, it increases price elasticity so that sudden derivatives deleveraging moves the order book faster across wider dollar ranges.
 
Third, adjust leverage downward during institutional ETF outflow regimes. Prior to the November 8–9 slide to $73,708.00 that liquidated $855.69 million, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs had experienced multi-hundred-million-dollar net redemption sessions. Monitoring daily spot Bitcoin ETF flows warns traders when institutional spot bids are stepping back: during sustained ETF outflow weeks, scaling leverage down to 3x–5x or choosing to rebalance spot Bitcoin collateral eliminates the risk of being swept out during U.S. market-open volatility.
 
Fourth, use miner production floors to anchor low-leverage swing positions. According to live hashprice telemetry on Luxor Hashrate Index and the cost breakdown in the Bitcoin mining break-even price analysis (where a mainstream 270 TH/s rig grosses roughly $10.50 per day and network average production costs cluster in the $53,000.00 to $58,500.00 band), opening a 3x isolated long at $75,000.00 sets your liquidation price at $50,375.00—below the network's fundamental PoW production cost floor.
 

Exclusive View from the MEXC Editorial Team

 
The $855.69 million liquidation flush across 140,000+ traders on November 8 and 9, 2026—triggered by a move to $73,708.00 that represented less than a 4% pullback from Friday's levels—exposes the core arithmetic mistake in retail derivatives trading: treating the leverage slider as a return multiplier rather than a distance-to-liquidation selector.
 
In the isolated linear formula $$P_{liq} = P_0 \times (1 - 1/L + MMR$$, the 0.50% Maintenance Margin Rate acts as a non-negotiable fixed tax on your survival buffer. At 5x leverage, 0.50% is a rounding error against a 20.00% initial margin deposit, leaving a 19.50% ($14,625.00) price cushion. At 50x leverage, that same 0.50% MMR consumes a quarter of your 2.00% initial margin, leaving a 1.50% ($1,125.00) cushion; at 100x, it consumes half of your 1.00% deposit, leaving a 0.50% ($375.00) cushion that cannot survive a routine fifteen-minute candle during the U.S. session.
 
What actually separates durable derivatives desks from liquidated accounts is reversing the order of operations before placing a trade. Instead of picking a round leverage number like 20x or 50x first and accepting whatever liquidation price the terminal outputs, disciplined traders start with the chart: identify the structural invalidation zone where the trade thesis is proven wrong, place a Mark-Price-triggered Stop-Loss at that boundary, and then size the margin deposit so the exchange's liquidation price sits at least 2% to 3% further away than the stop-loss. When your stop-loss always fires long before your Margin Ratio reaches 100%, the liquidation engine never gets a chance to touch your capital.
 

FAQ

 

How do you calculate the liquidation price for a Bitcoin (BTC) futures trade?

 
For an isolated USDT-margined linear perpetual contract with no extra margin added, calculate a long liquidation price as Entry Price multiplied by (1 minus 1 divided by Leverage plus the Maintenance Margin Rate), and a short liquidation price as Entry Price multiplied by (1 plus 1 divided by Leverage minus the Maintenance Margin Rate). For example, opening a 1 BTC long at $75,000.00 with 10x leverage and a 0.50% (0.005) Maintenance Margin Rate yields a liquidation price of $75,000.00 × (1 - 0.10 + 0.005) = $67,875.00, meaning a 9.50% ($7,125.00) price drop triggers liquidation.
 

Why does a 100x Bitcoin long liquidate after a 0.50% drop instead of a 1.00% drop?

 
At 100x leverage, your initial margin deposit equals 1.00% of the position's notional value ($750.00 on a $75,000.00 BTC position), so a 1.00% drop reaches the bankruptcy price where your equity hits zero. However, exchanges enforce a minimum Maintenance Margin Rate (typically 0.40% to 0.50% at the base tier) to ensure positions can be closed before going negative. Subtracting the 0.50% maintenance requirement from the 1.00% initial deposit leaves only a 0.50% ($375.00) price buffer before the liquidation engine takes over.
 

What is the difference between Liquidation Price and Bankruptcy Price?

 
Liquidation Price is the Mark Price level at which your remaining margin equity falls to the required Maintenance Margin threshold (Margin Ratio = 100%), triggering automated forced closure by the exchange. Bankruptcy Price is the theoretical price level where 100% of your deposited margin is lost (zero remaining equity). On a $75,000.00 10x isolated long with a 0.50% MMR, the Liquidation Price is $67,875.00 while the Bankruptcy Price is $67,500.00; the $375.00 gap gives the liquidation engine room to close the order in the book without creating a deficit.
 

Why did my BTC liquidation price move closer to the market price while I held the position?

 
Even if you do not change your position size, your liquidation price can drift closer to the current price for two reasons: first, perpetual futures settle funding payments every eight hours, and if funding fees are deducted from your position margin (such as a long paying positive funding), your margin cushion shrinks and your long liquidation price moves upward; second, if you are using Cross Margin, unrealized losses on other open positions or transfers out of your futures wallet reduce your shared available balance.
 

How does liquidation risk differ between USDT-margined and BTC-margined (inverse) futures?

 
Linear USDT-margined futures use stablecoin collateral whose dollar value remains constant, producing a linear relationship between price drops and margin loss. Inverse BTC-margined futures use Bitcoin itself as collateral: when BTC price falls, an inverse long suffers both unrealized contract losses and a simultaneous drop in the dollar value of its BTC collateral, causing a 10x inverse long opened at $75,000.00 to liquidate at $68,493.15 (-8.68%) compared with $67,875.00 (-9.50%) on a linear USDT contract.
 

How can traders lower their long liquidation price during a market selloff?

 
Traders can push a long liquidation price lower (further away from current price) in four ways: first, manually add extra margin (Add Margin) to the isolated position, which lowers a 1 BTC liquidation price by $1.00 for every 1.00 USDT added; second, reduce the leverage multiplier before entry (3x to 5x leverage provides a 19.50% to 32.83% drawdown buffer); third, partially close a large whale position so its notional value drops into a lower Maintenance Margin Rate tier; and fourth, always place a Mark-Price-triggered Stop-Loss order well above the liquidation threshold.
 

Disclaimer

 
This article is for general information only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, legal advice, tax advice or any trading recommendation. Prices of crypto assets, equities and other related financial assets can move sharply, and the historical data, company disclosures and third-party expectations cited here cannot guarantee future results, while the consensus estimates and third-party projections referenced do not represent actual outcomes and will change with subsequent disclosures and revisions. Readers should conduct their own research and reach independent judgments based on their own financial circumstances, investment objectives and risk tolerance, consulting a qualified professional where appropriate. The MEXC Crypto Pulse team accepts no liability for any direct or indirect losses arising from use of the information in this article.
 

About the Author

 
MEXC Editorial Team provides the latest platform updates, product launches, trading feature guides, and industry insights. With a focus on developments in the global crypto market, it delivers transparent information, professional data, and forward-looking analysis. Both beginners and experienced traders can find firsthand updates, in-depth observations, and official announcements related to the MEXC ecosystem.
 

Research References

 
Market Opportunity
Bitcoin Logo
Bitcoin Price(BTC)
$73,466.46
$73,466.46$73,466.46
USD

The articles shared on this page are sourced from public platforms and are provided for reference only. They do not represent the position or views of MEXC. All rights belong to MEXC Editorial Team. If you believe any content infringes upon the rights of a third party, please contact service@support.mexc.com for prompt removal. MEXC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of any content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC. For expert insights and in-depth analysis, visit MEXC Learn.

Latest Updates on Bitcoin

View More
Bitcoin-Backed Borrowing: How Circle Unlocks USDC

Bitcoin-Backed Borrowing: How Circle Unlocks USDC

Circle has launched Digital Asset-Backed Borrowing for eligible Circle Mint LLC customers, creating an integrated institutional workflow that allows Bitcoin holders to access USDC liquidity without first selling their BTC. Launched on September 21, 2026, the service allows eligible customers to deposit BTC, mint Circle Wrapped Bitcoin (cirBTC), move that tokenized collateral through a wallet they control into supported third-party lending markets, and receive borrowed USDC directly in Circle Mint. The workflow is available across Arc and Ethereum, with Morpho-supported markets included at launch
2026/09/22
Altcoin Trading Volume Nears 4x BTC—Is Rotation Real?

Altcoin Trading Volume Nears 4x BTC—Is Rotation Real?

Altcoin trading volume has surged relative to Bitcoin, with recent spot activity approaching four times BTC spot volume and reaching its strongest relative level since September 2025. The shift is notable because it is occurring alongside broader market participation rather than an obvious surge in leverage. Glassnode reported that 72.5% of the altcoins it tracks outperformed Bitcoin over the latest week, while overall exchange spot volume had more than doubled from its August low. At the same time, altcoin perpetual open interest measured in coins had barely increased over the previous 30 days, suggesting that the latest rotation has been driven more by spot-market participation than by a rapid build-up of leveraged derivatives positions
2026/09/29
Hong Kong Solana ETF: Can SOL Follow Bitcoin's Path?

Hong Kong Solana ETF: Can SOL Follow Bitcoin's Path?

Hong Kong is expanding regulated access to Solana with the listing of the Pando Solana ETF on October 13, 2026. The product, trading under stock code 2831 on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, becomes the market’s second spot Solana ETF rather than its first. ChinaAMC launched its own Solana ETF on October 27, 2025, giving investors almost a year of real-world data against which the new product can be judged. That history changes the key question. The launch is no longer simply about whether regulators will permit a Hong Kong Solana ETF. It is about whether a second issuer can deepen liquidity, attract incremental capital and turn regulated SOL exposure into a meaningful institutional allocation channel.
2026/10/13
View More